SCOTUS and whatnot

[CMRivdogs]

Not the Supreme  Court, but its sure to end up there

 

[CMRivdogs]

 

[smr-nj]

14 hours ago, CMRivdogs said:

 

“Freedom for me, but not for thee”.

[chasfh]

3 hours ago, smr-nj said:

“Freedom for me, but not for thee”.

Wouldn’t surprise me to learn that some dishonest pundit on Fox has pointed out that there are no rights for trans people explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. 

[CMRivdogs]

So, Alito was in the room where it happened? It's time to set term limits on judges...or maybe just age limits

 

[Tigeraholic1]

Common sense.

 

[pfife]

Its not common sense

[CMRivdogs]

 

Edited March 23 by CMRivdogs

[chasfh]

1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said:

 

So adorable how the "[the justices would] be shocked at how well organized and secure [elections] are" poster proceeds from the assumption that they are honest and impartial actors.

[gehringer_2]

2 hours ago, chasfh said:

So adorable how the "[the justices would] be shocked at how well organized and secure [elections] are" poster proceeds from the assumption that they are honest and impartial actors.

The way the system is supposed to work, findings of fact - like how an election works, are supposed to be established at the trial court. Unfortunately, that's a distinction that often doesn't make a difference in the end, because the Justices are still using their own belief system and the 'facts' they hold within that belief system, to make their judgements on matters that in theory are only about 'the law' of a case, but never really are.

In a technological age where the Justices are often totally ignorant about the real world context of what they are deciding, I wonder if the fact that appeal courts are not tasked to retry the facts of cases almost becomes an impediment to good outcomes.

Edited March 23 by gehringer_2

[Tigeraholic1]

8-1, impressive.

 

[pfife]

Thats a magaholic double flusher

[romad1]

Trump is sayng he's actually going to go to the US Supreme Court tomorrow for this

 

That will be interesting.   You know an amendment is sort of a big deal.  It means that the popular will was to ratify that amendment.  Him saying things are just so does not countermand an amendment. 

[buddha]

On 3/31/2026 at 8:00 PM, romad1 said:

Trump is sayng he's actually going to go to the US Supreme Court tomorrow for this

 

That will be interesting.   You know an amendment is sort of a big deal.  It means that the popular will was to ratify that amendment.  Him saying things are just so does not countermand an amendment. 

it will be at least 7-2 against trump's EO.  the odds are better that its 9-0 than the order is upheld.  

[romad1]

29 minutes ago, buddha said:

it will be at least 7-2 against trump's EO.  the odds are better that its 9-0 than the order is upheld.  

One can only imagine the upheaval.  My father is 97 and is a citizen by birth to an immigrant mother and father.   Several Trump children also fall into that category. 

[oblong]

I saw quotes by Barret to the effect of "Yeah but the Constitution"

The solicitor is like "It's a brave new world...." Roberts said "It might be but the constitution is still the constitution"

[buddha]

1 hour ago, romad1 said:

One can only imagine the upheaval.  My father is 97 and is a citizen by birth to an immigrant mother and father.   Several Trump children also fall into that category. 

depends what kind of opinion they write too.  if they make it broad, they might lose thomas, alito, kavanaugh, and maybe gorsuch.  if its just about the EO, maybe they only lose thomas and possibly alito, maybe kavanaugh?

the questioning was pretty favorable to the aclu, even from alito.