Jump to content

Detroit Lions 2024 Offseason Thread


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RedRamage said:

Which again is why I want that other special status... Based on what info is being thrown around it certainly seems likely that there's fire tied to this smoke. But we don't know for sure, and independent of this situation there may be other situations where it's less clear if there's fire or not.

A team is in a catch-22... if they cut the player and he's found innocent, they potentially lost out on his talent. The player gets a public black eye because he was cut and losing out on his salary. 

But if a team doesn't cut the player right quickly and he's found guilty the team gets the black eye for paying and associating with a bad individual.

A temporary status protects the teams and the players and the image. "We're temporarily disassociating ourselves from this player until all the facts are known and he has his day in court. If he's guilty, he's gone and doesn't get back pay. If he's innocent he's restore to full status and gets his back pay."

They won’t cut him until the legal process plays out and they can point to the player as having violated personal conduct provisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jason_R said:

They won’t cut him until the legal process plays out and they can point to the player as having violated personal conduct provisions. 

Which again is part of the problem. This makes sense legally speaking, but optically the narrative is this guy threw his gf out a third story window and now is evading police... but the Lions are still employing him? Still paying him? Do they not care about women!?!? Do they not care about stopping domestic violence?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RedRamage said:

Which again is part of the problem. This makes sense legally speaking, but optically the narrative is this guy threw his gf out a third story window and now is evading police... but the Lions are still employing him? Still paying him? Do they not care about women!?!? Do they not care about stopping domestic violence?!?

No it’s not part of the problem. The Lions are not guilty of anything.

And what are they paying him? There are no games so there are no game checks. He may have a roster bonus or a workout bonus that kick in near training camp but those are unlikely to be earned at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the Lions are looking to have Goodell place him on the Commissioner’s Exempt List.

I believe doing so would mean he would not be included in the present cap figure. At such a point as he is officially found to have violated his contract (thus forfeiting the guaranteed money) he could likely be released at a fraction of the dead cap hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Motown Bombers said:

I’m not a legal expert but I’m guessing bond none is not good. 
IMG_0056.thumb.jpeg.3cc44bb61ac02fb60984e70670b76ac1.jpeg

  it just means a no bond warrant. So the person will have to go before a judge/magistrate who will set bond. Standard practice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Motown Bombers said:

I’m not a legal expert but I’m guessing bond none is not good. 
IMG_0056.thumb.jpeg.3cc44bb61ac02fb60984e70670b76ac1.jpeg

Me either. But he hasn’t been arraigned so it likely just means that he has to stay in custody until arraigned, at which point the judge or magistrate will set a bond. He can’t just turn himself in, post bond, and leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jason_R said:

No it’s not part of the problem. The Lions are not guilty of anything.

And what are they paying him? There are no games so there are no game checks. He may have a roster bonus or a workout bonus that kick in near training camp but those are unlikely to be earned at this point. 

No, the Lions aren't legally guilty of anything. But public opinion =/= legal standing. If the court of public opinion says Sutton is guilty and a despicable person, the Lions be keeping him on the roster are also guilty (in the court of public opinion) by not disassociating themselves.

Depends on if they are only paying him in season or if it's split over 12 months. My wife, a teacher, gets paid year round even though she only teaches ~9months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RedRamage said:

No, the Lions aren't legally guilty of anything. But public opinion =/= legal standing. If the court of public opinion says Sutton is guilty and a despicable person, the Lions be keeping him on the roster are also guilty (in the court of public opinion) by not disassociating themselves.

Depends on if they are only paying him in season or if it's split over 12 months. My wife, a teacher, gets paid year round even though she only teaches ~9months.

They are paid 18 times a year after each week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I can be spared from the pearl clutching. It's possible to simultaneously be disgusted by the allegations and domestic violence generally while still wondering what the implications to the team are. There is not a mandatory period of deeper sociological thought required here. I think it's inappropriate for Payton to police people's sympathies and thoughts like this.

It also bears mention that for some number of people to whom domestic violence is a very real part of their life, sport serves as a healthy distraction. For those people especially, telling them to think about the domestic violence right now instead of the sport can be incredibly tone deaf to the realities (and prevalence) of domestic violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this is bad. Putting aside the football aspect of it which is relatively unimportant, these allegations are really bad and him allegedly evading the police makes it even worse. It's prudent to wait for my details to come out before burning him at the stake but, yeah, not looking good for Cam to say the least. 

In terms of the football aspect, the Lions should act quickly with this so they can move forward while there are still some free agents out there because you don't want to shoehorn yourself into needing to draft a corner with a high pick.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NYLion said:

Well, this is bad. Putting aside the football aspect of it which is relatively unimportant, these allegations are really bad and him allegedly evading the police makes it even worse. It's prudent to wait for my details to come out before burning him at the stake but, yeah, not looking good for Cam to say the least. 

In terms of the football aspect, the Lions should act quickly with this so they can move forward while there are still some free agents out there because you don't want to shoehorn yourself into needing to draft a corner with a high pick.

Stephon Gilmore seems like a good idea now. Even if Sutton remains on the Lions, he no doubt will be suspended. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

Lions would only save $1.5 million in cap space if he's cut post June 1st. 

If the allegations are true, they are going to cut bait with him WAY before June 1st so I don't see that being an issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NYLion said:

If the allegations are true, they are going to cut bait with him WAY before June 1st so I don't see that being an issue. 

I believe they could cut him now with a post June 1st designation. It would save them a lot of cap space to do it that way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MichiganCardinal said:

 

I can be spared from the pearl clutching. It's possible to simultaneously be disgusted by the allegations and domestic violence generally while still wondering what the implications to the team are. There is not a mandatory period of deeper sociological thought required here. I think it's inappropriate for Payton to police people's sympathies and thoughts like this.

It also bears mention that for some number of people to whom domestic violence is a very real part of their life, sport serves as a healthy distraction. For those people especially, telling them to think about the domestic violence right now instead of the sport can be incredibly tone deaf to the realities (and prevalence) of domestic violence.

Right. If this was during the season and people were saying “well, looks like Sutton committed a serious crime but we have an important game coming up and we should play him anyways this weekend because we really need to beat the Packers”, then I would agree with Payton. But that’s not what is happening. People are thinking that it is highly likely to be the end of Sutton in Detroit, so fine, what does that mean for the cap and how do the Lions plug this new hole. No one is saying law enforcement or the NFL should look the other way just because it impacts the Lions’ secondary. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted for context:

image.thumb.png.04b63d421b920b9b7b3be8e4e39fa5be.png

Maximum penalties for a third-degree felony is five years in prison, but the ultimate sentence if convicted will be dependent on a whole host of other factors.

Sutton deserves his day in court like anyone else, but these are very serious allegations. Based on everything out there right now, I think the Lions should be exploring options to cut ties.

Edited by MichiganCardinal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, SkyBlue said:

Almost as if the Lions knew something was going when they added two DB's in the last week.

They needed to add two DBs even with Sutton. I highly doubt that the Lions knew about this for 2 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

Reports are the girlfriend had injuries so I'm guessing strangulation marks on her neck. He may very well of played his last game in the NFL. He's not good enough for a team to take on this baggage. 

Yeah, assuming it's true this is a bad crime and a bad, bad look for any team that would take him on. In theory he could rehabilitate himself over a few years and maybe make a comeback, but given he was never a star player and is already 29 I don't see that being likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      260
    • Most Online
      206

    Newest Member
    MeanJim
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...