Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Between your spelling and the need to always double post, I'm seriously wondering if you're okay over there.  Seriously bro, take some deep breaths and calm down.   

The bottom line for me is that all countries have the right to control their borders and enforce immigration laws.  Nobody has the right to be in a country illegally, full stop.  

With that, I'm done with this, there is nothing more to say on the issue for now. 

Posted
Just now, GalagaGuy said:

 

 Nobody has the right to be in a country illegally, full stop.  

 

False.  You should at least learn the laws you claim to support. 

I'm feeding squirrels so you can find the law I'm referring to yourself 

Posted
16 hours ago, GalagaGuy said:

Why is 100% of your attention on the officers and 0% of it on the person in the country illegally?

One is trying to live the American dream.  The other is rapidly destroying it.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
11 hours ago, ewsieg said:

I rewatched it and there were blue and red lights.  I can't say what the laws are there, but in Michigan you can't have the blue.  Initially I didn't catch that, I was focusing on the interaction.  I'm guessing the guy is going to be tried with obstruction and assault on an officer.  That said, I can understand the guy resisting initially, seemed like he had no clue they were law enforcement at first.  As for the assault, the two guys had him on the ground, seems like you're typical over policing scrum which led to the one officer getting hurt.  

Legally, it doesn't appear they did anything wrong.  But I can't believe you don't show pause when you see action like that on a street because the guy hasn't taken care of some traffic tickets (and is on a moped, not a semi).

I'm out of likes, but all of this is spot on

Posted

In what state do you have to have a license plate to vote? Having a license plate assumes you are both a driver and owner of a vehicle of some sort to drive. So is he suggesting that in Florida that older folks that can't drive anymore or people with disabilities who can't drive are ineligible to vote and turned away at the polls?

Posted

Also, if Joe Biden had said you need a license plate to vote in Delaware it would be on every newscast and pundit show for the next week. Plus, there would be headlines from papers like WSJ, NY Post, NYT and WaPo talking about Biden's age and cognitive abilities. I only saw a Yahoo News article on this story and little more.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

In what state do you have to have a license plate to vote? Having a license plate assumes you are both a driver and owner of a vehicle of some sort to drive. So is he suggesting that in Florida that older folks that can't drive anymore or people with disabilities who can't drive are ineligible to vote and turned away at the polls?

Maybe they'd need to license their golf carts (if it already isn't a law). 

Posted
38 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

I always carry an extra screwdriver with me just in case someone forgets

 

He doesn't need to remember drivers license is different than license plate because he has an army of Stuart Rhodes out there willing to do violence against reporters and politicians who upset him. 

Posted
12 hours ago, GalagaGuy said:

I prefer the police be able to do their job without being harassed by idiots that think they know everything.  You'd want that same respect I think.   

I’m not a public employee on the public dime, and it’s not as though we’re talking about DMV employees being harassed in the office.

Police carry immense power in the public space with lethal weapons at their disposal, and I think that specifically because of that, they should be held to a much, much, much higher standard of conduct than just about any other public employee. Despite what you appear to think, we are not engaged in a shooting war in this country, so they shouldn’t be acting as though they are soldiers deployed to Iraq.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I’m not a public employee on the public dime, and it’s not as though we’re talking about DMV employees being harassed in the office.

Police carry immense power in the public space with lethal weapons at their disposal, and I think that specifically because of that, they should be held to a much, much, much higher standard of conduct than just about any other public employee. Despite what you appear to think, we are not engaged in a shooting war in this country, so they shouldn’t be acting as though they are soldiers deployed to Iraq.

It's funny, one minute you say that you don't even know that they're police and the next you're demanding a higher level of scrutiny because they're police.  Can't have it both ways. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, romad1 said:

body cams are a good way to keep police crime to a minimum. 

Only argument I have is that I would substitute 'good' with 'great'.  Additionally, it hasn't only helped ensure police follow the laws, but helped police that do follow the laws from getting unwarranted complaints as well.  I have a family member that is a Wayne County Sheriff and complaints have dropped tremendously since they were required to wear them.  For the majority of complaints he still follows up, he'll show the body cam to the prisoner if it's been deemed not credible and the response most of the time is they just hoped the sheriff had it turned off so they could get in trouble for that.  

Probably the only group against them now would be defense attorneys. 

Posted
12 hours ago, GalagaGuy said:

Between your spelling and the need to always double post, I'm seriously wondering if you're okay over there.  Seriously bro, take some deep breaths and calm down.   

The bottom line for me is that all countries have the right to control their borders and enforce immigration laws.  Nobody has the right to be in a country illegally, full stop.  

With that, I'm done with this, there is nothing more to say on the issue for now. 

What is this is obsession you have with illegal immigrants?  Do you feel this way about every law?  What about driving over the speed limit?  

Posted
4 minutes ago, romad1 said:

I'm very much against insurrection, stealing classified documents, falsifying business records and threats to murder the VP.  

I would add strong arming businesses for "campaign" contributions as a way to approve things like mergers and avoid "sanctions". Universities are included in this as well (withholding previously approved funds because of political differences)

Posted
26 minutes ago, romad1 said:

I'm very much against insurrection, stealing classified documents, falsifying business records and threats to murder the VP.  

With Vance I'd settle for improvements in three out of four.

Posted

They're in the US on legal visas. Being accused with some sort of relationship to a child pornography ring without being presented with evidence or charges. Held overnight and shipped out to parts unknown.

https://www.whro.org/business-growth/2025-08-18/more-filipino-cruise-ship-workers-detained-deported-from-norfolk-based-carnival-sunshine?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwMReylleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHkMmIx-7b83pwE3WZbCwRN4Vk_OZXY22k06DImUr6ctJ4oQofsL7shIQKLPT_aem_GhNgOhr51hDuz9b942i11A

Hey G Man please defend this with a plausible explanation. if the charges are credible they still should be allowed a fair trial, at least

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...