pfife Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, GalagaGuy said: It's funny, one minute you say that you don't even know that they're police and the next you're demanding a higher level of scrutiny because they're police. Can't have it both ways. Yes we can Quote
romad1 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago "who watches the watchers" ..."Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" is a latin phrase which shows you how long it has been important in government of free peoples to have control over the people in charge of keeping order. Those who think the po po shouldn't be subject to scrutiny do not have our best interests in mind. Quote
Tigermojo Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 2 hours ago, Tiger337 said: What is this is obsession you have with illegal immigrants? Do you feel this way about every law? What about driving over the speed limit? One foot in the rabbit hole. Russian propaganda works too well. Quote
Tiger337 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 3 hours ago, GalagaGuy said: It's funny, one minute you say that you don't even know that they're police and the next you're demanding a higher level of scrutiny because they're police. Can't have it both ways. Why not? Quote
pfife Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago The best is that his upshot from that declaration is.... scrutinize no one. Quote
LaceyLou Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Something about the way this discussion has turned makes me remember the guy in the Fenway neighborhood who used to yell at teenagers walking by and talking to 'shut up and get off of my lawn.' He lived in an apartment building. He didn't have a lawn. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 5 hours ago, GalagaGuy said: It's funny, one minute you say that you don't even know that they're police and the next you're demanding a higher level of scrutiny because they're police. Can't have it both ways. Quote
chasfh Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 3 hours ago, pfife said: Yes we can He does not want people who put on a sash that says "police" on it to be held under any standard of conduct. He also voted for Harris, under whom the police would definitely be held to strict standards of conduct. Quote
GalagaGuy Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 36 minutes ago, chasfh said: He does not want people who put on a sash that says "police" on it to be held under any standard of conduct. He also voted for Harris, under whom the police would definitely be held to strict standards of conduct. Well first off, they are being held to standards of conduct, just not the ones you and the rest of the illegal immigration supporting mob would want. The simple fact is that they are wearing clothing and identifying themselves in accordance with their agency's policies. All of these talking points you illegal immigration supporters have come up with are just plain stupid. But hey, you once saw a police officer in a blue uniform and silly hat give his name and badge number to someone so that must be the rules for all law enforcement officers. Quote
Tigerbomb13 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago What immigrants puked in his breakfast cereal? 1 1 Quote
LaceyLou Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said: What immigrants puked in his breakfast cereal? Yup. It does seem like he's got a whole lot of animosity towards them. But of course I'm obviously just part of that mob who wants no laws whatsoever, so I suspect my opinion doesn't matter. Quote
chasfh Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said: What immigrants puked in his breakfast cereal? Yeah, I've had it with the trolling and the intellectual dishonesty and the name-calling and the flat out lying. It won't end well. It never does. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Those who whitewash the path own the future with blood on their hands . Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said: What immigrants puked in his breakfast cereal? Also interesting that the thinking is in black and white with no middle ground. Totally colorblind there. 1 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 8 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: Those who whitewash the path own the future with blood on their hands . Just an aside, In Virginia's capitol of Williamsburg about 50% of the residents were African American. 50% of those were slaves. There were a number of free blacks. If we were taught the truth in schools, the thinking on this might change a bit. In states like Virginia, North and South Carolina the economy was largely agrarian. Negros had been imported to primarily work the fields, but also many worked in homes. By the time the Revolution came around the system was imbedded in the regions economy. Also by then laws, mostly set up by the colonies legislatures and approved by the English governing body made it nearly impossible to free the slaves without bankrupting the regions economy. It was one of those impossible conundrums. Yes the Washington's, Jefferson's Madison's and such were hypocrites and racists. It took the Civil War to begin to change things. BTW, I'm not defending it. Just telling the truth. Quote
Tiger337 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 59 minutes ago, chasfh said: Yeah, I've had it with the trolling and the intellectual dishonesty and the name-calling and the flat out lying. It won't end well. It never does. The funny thing is that this is the only issue where he does this. He seems pretty moderate on everything else. Quote
GalagaGuy Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tiger337 said: The funny thing is that this is the only issue where he does this. He seems pretty moderate on everything else. It's almost as if I take each issue one by one rather than dumping everything into one of two buckets and choosing which one is mine to carry. 🤔 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago All the high crime areas in DC. Once upon a time we were told to avoid DuPont Circle because of all the Hippies. Quote
chasfh Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, Tiger337 said: The funny thing is that this is the only issue where he does this. He seems pretty moderate on everything else. I just can’t abide the name-calling, intellectual dishonesty, and blatant disrepresentation. If I want that nonsense, I’ll go someplace unmoderated, like Reddit. Quote
GalagaGuy Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, chasfh said: I just can’t abide the name-calling, intellectual dishonesty, and blatant disrepresentation. If I want that nonsense, I’ll go someplace unmoderated, like Reddit. I've never called anyone names so spare me the blatant lies. The whole "intellectual dishonesty" is also bull**** and you damn well know it. The only problem here is your arrogance in thinking that you're right about everything. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said: All the high crime areas in DC. Once upon a time we were told to avoid DuPont Circle because of all the Hippies. It's all about the show. Most everything with Trump is. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 37 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: It's all about the show. Most everything with Trump is. Yep, I bet TACO has never been anywhere near areas like Anacosta (SE) or any area in the NW part of the district. Basically he's taking resources from other places to feed his ego. Nothing more. Maybe some enterprising reporter should ask him about that His so called department heads/ FOX Alumni are not much better. Edited 3 hours ago by CMRivdogs Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.