guy incognito Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, chasfh said: He's going to want her buried alive with him in his sarcophagus. I can picture him doing the whole Dr. Phibes bit with the organ and everything. Quote
Tigerbomb13 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago The outright corruption is breathtaking and will be studied for decades to come. 2 Quote
guy incognito Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) “Because it is such an open sewer of an arrangement, this is the most soul-sucking, despicable, and scandalous transaction ever conducted by a head of state not named Borgia. It dwarfs all the scandals in this country’s history—Whiskey Ring, Crédit Mobilier, Teapot Dome, Watergate, Iran–Contra. It puts in the shade all the grifting and double-dealing and outright theft that democracy is heir to. Boss Tweed was a piker compared to this guy, and John Mitchell was a Franciscan monk.” https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a71341893/trump-irs-lawsuit-settlement-anti-weaponization-fund/ Edited 15 hours ago by guy incognito 1 Quote
pfife Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago No government handouts for convicted criminals!! 1 Quote
Tiger337 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 7 minutes ago, pfife said: No government handouts for convicted criminals!! Weak on crime. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 12 hours ago, Tigerbomb13 said: The outright corruption is breathtaking and will be studied for decades to come. So adorable you believe there will be decades to come … 😉 Quote
chasfh Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 6 hours ago, guy incognito said: “Because it is such an open sewer of an arrangement, this is the most soul-sucking, despicable, and scandalous transaction ever conducted by a head of state not named Borgia. It dwarfs all the scandals in this country’s history—Whiskey Ring, Crédit Mobilier, Teapot Dome, Watergate, Iran–Contra. It puts in the shade all the grifting and double-dealing and outright theft that democracy is heir to. Boss Tweed was a piker compared to this guy, and John Mitchell was a Franciscan monk.” https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a71341893/trump-irs-lawsuit-settlement-anti-weaponization-fund/ Today: “Trump’s latest scheme will go down as the most disgusting in American history.” Next month: “What was that thing again he did last month that we thought was the most disgusting thing ever? Remind me …” 1 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, chasfh said: Today: “Trump’s latest scheme will go down as the most disgusting in American history.” Next month: “What was that thing again he did last month that we thought was the most disgusting thing ever? Remind me …” well we are due for some new craziness from Trump in the next day or two. The market has been sliding for several days and West Tx Intermediate is almost at $104. 1 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago He's actually more concerned about his $1.776 Billion payoff to January 6 felons than how gas prices affect law abiding folks 1 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: He's actually more concerned about his $1.776 Billion payoff to January 6 felons than how gas prices affect law abiding folks I just love how the public falls for these non-sequitor arguments. *if* you actually could prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon with all this noise, they you could argue about the value of that vs gas prices. But the premise is false. We couldn't prevent Pakistan from developing a weapon, we couldn't stop India from developing a weapon, we couldn't even stop N. Korea from developing a weapon. If a country as large and well educated and financial sound as Iran wants a weapon, they will get it. They could already have had one by now it they had really wanted a program that was more than a bargaining chip for them. The objective truth is the only real way to stop Iran from eventually developing a weapon is for them to decide they don't need one - that the costs aren't worth the payoff. You sure as heII don't accomplish that by attacking them constantly. 1 1 Quote
guy incognito Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Edited 5 hours ago by guy incognito 2 Quote
chasfh Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said: He's actually more concerned about his $1.776 Billion payoff to January 6 felons than how gas prices affect law abiding folks I legitimately wonder how much of this will go toward the establishment of a nationwide militia answerable only to him, for which they will have ready-to-go recruits who are at least somewhat battle-tested. Quote
chasfh Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said: I just love how the public falls for these non-sequitor arguments. *if* you actually could prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon with all this noise, they you could argue about the value of that vs gas prices. But the premise is false. We couldn't prevent Pakistan from developing a weapon, we couldn't stop India from developing a weapon, we couldn't even stop N. Korea from developing a weapon. If a country as large and well educated and financial sound as Iran wants a weapon, they will get it. They could already have had one by now it they had really wanted a program that was more than a bargaining chip for them. The objective truth is the only real way to stop Iran from eventually developing a weapon is for them to decide they don't need one - that the costs aren't worth the payoff. You sure as heII don't accomplish that by attacking them constantly. Another objective truth is that we already had Iran in a box, severely limited in the ability to enrich the uranium for use in a nuclear weapon and subject to regular inspections to ensure compliance, and this Putin acolyte completely let them off the hook for all of it, or at the very least, helped collapse the deal’s restraints and transparency regime. Quote
chasfh Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, guy incognito said: Will they be vetted for competency in militia participation? I'm guessing yes. Next will be Russians. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 48 minutes ago, chasfh said: Another objective truth is that we already had Iran in a box, severely limited in the ability to enrich the uranium for use in a nuclear weapon and subject to regular inspections to ensure compliance exactly - there was a system of carrots and sticks that made it in their interest to just string the development along without actually going there. The incentives at that time made a half completed program more advantageous to them than a completed one as it brought the carrots. Take all that away and there is no advantage to not completing the program. 1 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 26 minutes ago, Tigerbomb13 said: can somebody please go sit on Fetterman? Or maybe break the arm he votes with? Edited 41 minutes ago by gehringer_2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.