pfife Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 hour ago, guy incognito said: I just threw up in my mouth a lot. Tds = trump dependency syndrome Quote
CMRivdogs Posted June 6 Posted June 6 This explains a lot. I guess pastors forget important roles women played in their Bibles Quote
CMRivdogs Posted June 6 Posted June 6 (edited) I'll take things 4 year olds say for $176 Billion Edited June 6 by CMRivdogs Quote
CMRivdogs Posted June 6 Posted June 6 45 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: This explains a lot. I guess pastors forget important roles women played in their Bibles Quote
gehringer_2 Posted June 6 Posted June 6 3 hours ago, guy incognito said: I just threw up in my mouth a lot. Not a cult Quote
gehringer_2 Posted June 6 Posted June 6 28 minutes ago, chasfh said: Also, not for nothing … I'd love to know whether there are any investment managers out of there getting out of their Nasdaq index holdings adding to this or they are all fine with the IPO shenanigans. Quote
guy incognito Posted June 6 Posted June 6 (edited) While Pig-King naps through Oval Office meetings and whiles away the nights posting self-aggrandizing AI slop videos, his personal army of Brownshirt thugs continues terrorizing citizens who dare to exercise their 1A rights protesting his gulags. Edited June 6 by guy incognito 1 Quote
Edman85 Posted June 6 Posted June 6 (edited) On 6/5/2026 at 12:08 PM, chasfh said: What is the Washington Post trying to accomplish by reporting on this? I thought Bezos was in the bag. Or do they see an opening to possibly replace Trump with a fascist who's actually competent on details? The changeover at WaPo has largely been on the opinion side, which definitely looks more like the WSJ opinion page these days. My understanding is that opinion and news desks are separate and independent. The complete gutting of some departments on the news side also leads to less overall getting reported. Edited June 6 by Edman85 1 Quote
guy incognito Posted June 6 Posted June 6 23 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: Shorter Hegseth: “The wrong side won.” 1 1 1 Quote
chasfh Posted June 6 Posted June 6 1 hour ago, guy incognito said: While Pig-King naps through Oval Office meetings and whiles away the nights posting self-aggrandizing AI slop videos, his personal army of Brownshirt thugs continues terrorizing citizens who dare to exercise their 1A rights protesting his gulags. I have a question about this characterization: when they say “protesters clash with ICE”, they make it sound like protesters initiated the confrontation. Did they? Did the protesters start it? Or did ICE attack them first? Because if it’s the latter, it’s not exactly protesters clashing, is it? I don’t know who “teesferalmind” is, and they almost certainly are not a journalist, but proper phrasing does matter when it comes to getting across a point of view. Unless teesferalmind’s point of view is pro-ICE, which in such a case makes the phrasing understandable. Quote
chasfh Posted June 6 Posted June 6 57 minutes ago, Edman85 said: The changeover at WaPo has largely been on the opinion side, which definitely looks more like the WSJ opinion page these days. My understanding is that opinion and news desks are separate and independent. The complete gutting of some departments on the news side also leads to less overall getting reported. That’s fine and it makes sense, but I would think if Bezos wants to put the Post totally in the bag for his president, he would direct the news editor to keep a tighter grip on what they report on so as not to upset friends in the regime. Because it’s not “fake opinion” the trump people rail against. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted June 6 Posted June 6 1 hour ago, chasfh said: That’s fine and it makes sense, but I would think if Bezos wants to put the Post totally in the bag for his president, he would direct the news editor to keep a tighter grip on what they report on so as not to upset friends in the regime. Because it’s not “fake opinion” the trump people rail against. it has seemed to me that the shift from the editorial board op-eds is more pro-business than pro-Trump, but overall it's the exodus of the better liberal contributing editors that makes it less anti-trump. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted June 6 Posted June 6 1 hour ago, Tigeraholic1 said: So true though. Stupid comment. But I expect nazi trolls like you D-Day was a military operation against a dictatorship. Migrants arriving in small boats are not an army, don’t have a chain of command, and aren’t trying to occupy European capitals. You can support stronger border enforcement if you wish, but calling migration an “invasion” doesn’t make it one. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted June 6 Posted June 6 (edited) 2 minutes ago, pfife said: I think immigrants are frickin awesome Unless you can trace your lineage back to indigenous people, we are all immigrants. Comparing what were basically boys in an organized invasion to defeat Nazi Germany. Most people crossing the Mediterranean are not armies nor are they arriving with tanks and artillery with plans to invade Europe. (or the US for that matter). Comparing those who gave their lives for their country to "illegal immigrants" demeans the memory of those who fought for freedom. Edited June 6 by CMRivdogs 1 Quote
casimir Posted June 6 Posted June 6 7 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: Unless you can trace your lineage back to indigenous people, we are all immigrants. That’s a level of intelligence that some people are incapable of understanding. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.