Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
47 minutes ago, IdahoBert said:

On the MLB app they’re acting like the “swing off“ is something to be so proud of that it’s worth reliving. I’ve gone to demolition derbys but it’s not something I brag about and need to relive. Come to think of it, though, a demolition derby is better than the “swing off.” There’s a brute honesty to a demolition derby. It doesn’t pretend to be more than it is.

They want to talk it up because they plan to keep using it. Next, they'll say everyone loves it. Pure gaslighting. Repeat a lie long and loud enough and it becomes a truth.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Sports_Freak said:

They want to talk it up because they plan to keep using it. Next, they'll say everyone loves it. Pure gaslighting. Repeat a lie long and loud enough and it becomes a truth.

yup.  

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
1 minute ago, RatkoVarda said:

hopefully Suarez can be had for a comparable price

I highly doubt it. Suarez has 35 home runs. I read today that 11 teams have inquired and we know the Yankees are highly interested. I don't see Harris giving up a top 100 plus more, which is what I believe it will take

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, tiger2022 said:

Naylor would have been a great pickup for the Tigers.  They didn't give up anything of significance. 

Platoon Tork in that scenario?

Posted
12 hours ago, papalawrence said:

I highly doubt it. Suarez has 35 home runs. I read today that 11 teams have inquired and we know the Yankees are highly interested. I don't see Harris giving up a top 100 plus more, which is what I believe it will take

I think this is right on. It's a weak deadline class so overpays will be the order of the day. Too bad we ourselves couldn't have sold into markets like this.

Posted
6 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Platoon Tork in that scenario?

Never.  Naylor can be the full time DH.  They are using Jones and Keith right now as the DH's.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, tiger2022 said:

Never.  Naylor can be the full time DH.  They are using Jones and Keith right now as the DH's.  

I like Naylor, but I don't know if he's much of an upgrade over a Keith/Jones platoon. I guess you know what your getting with Naylor, but based on what they are currently doing, a Keith/Jones platoon is pretty good.  

Posted
5 minutes ago, tiger2022 said:

Never.  Naylor can be the full time DH.  They are using Jones and Keith right now as the DH's.  

I don't think we're in the market for a full-time DH. We use the slot to keep guys in the batting order while giving them a break from the field. A full-time DH would have those guys totally benched instead. We've used seven different guys at DH just this month. As it is, the Tigers are 11th in WAR at DH, so it's not as though it's a black hole we need to fill.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I don't think we're in the market for a full-time DH. We use the slot to keep guys in the batting order while giving them a break from the field. A full-time DH would have those guys totally benched instead. We've used seven different guys at DH just this month. As it is, the Tigers are 11th in WAR at DH, so it's not as though it's a black hole we need to fill.

This too.  

Posted

Tigers execs got their message out to a few of the beat writers. They are going to be reasonably aggresive with the bullpen; But they aren't going to trade for rentals(sustainability) and are relying on Urquidy(sp) types to come back later in the season.

I don't mind it. The offense has to fix itself. I see guys like Javy and Zach regressing to their levels. Greene, Keith, Meados, and Vierling should not be this bad.

  • Like 1
Posted

It doesn't matter now because Naylor isn't available.

For bargain basement guys off the bench, maybe McCutchen from the Pirates.

I doubt if you'd need to give up much for them.

Posted
13 minutes ago, kdog said:

Tigers execs got their message out to a few of the beat writers. They are going to be reasonably aggresive with the bullpen; But they aren't going to trade for rentals(sustainability) and are relying on Urquidy(sp) types to come back later in the season.

I don't mind it. The offense has to fix itself. I see guys like Javy and Zach regressing to their levels. Greene, Keith, Meados, and Vierling should not be this bad.

I'm starting to question the need for bullpen arms. Averaging one run a game won't win many games. When was the last time this Tiger team had an inning with multiple hits and runs in an inning? No rallies, just waiting for a player to hit a home run.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

I'm starting to question the need for bullpen arms. Averaging one run a game won't win many games. When was the last time this Tiger team had an inning with multiple hits and runs in an inning? No rallies, just waiting for a player to hit a home run.

They need swing and miss on the back end no matter what. The internal solutions don't have it. You can't solve foundational offensive issues with one move. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

I'm starting to question the need for bullpen arms. Averaging one run a game won't win many games. When was the last time this Tiger team had an inning with multiple hits and runs in an inning? No rallies, just waiting for a player to hit a home run.

No, they need BP arms.  This stretch right now is a combination of nothing working.  But we've seen the offense work.  The BP really hasn't been up to task for a much longer stretch.

Part of the offensive game has been aggressive base running.  Can't do that with minimal base runners.  I'd wager the OBP has been amongst the bottom of the barrel the last couple of weeks.

Posted
1 minute ago, casimir said:

No, they need BP arms.  This stretch right now is a combination of nothing working.  But we've seen the offense work.  The BP really hasn't been up to task for a much longer stretch.

Part of the offensive game has been aggressive base running.  Can't do that with minimal base runners.  I'd wager the OBP has been amongst the bottom of the barrel the last couple of weeks.

Yes, they've needed a better bullpen all season. But the recent losses? They haven't even been in games. Not scoring any runs makes the bullpen needs meaningless. It was an obvious need earlier in the season but our recent offensive struggles is the reason we're losing. Not even giving our weak bullpen a chance to blow leads. 😆

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...