4hzglory Posted August 27 Posted August 27 10 minutes ago, KL2 said: He's a third round pick. 90 percent never amount to anything And if anything, Martin is a bigger bust from that class considering they moved up for him. Quote
RedRamage Posted August 27 Posted August 27 17 hours ago, Motor City Sonics said: Is Hendon Hooker the biggest draft bust in Brad's tenure with the Lions? Probably so far. I'm sure there will be bigger busts at some point, but right now Hooker has to be considered the biggest given where he was selected (3rd) and what production we got out of him (zero). I know a number of people have said he was only a 3rd round and not many of them make it and Brad has lot of other successes... which is all true, but I think that is some what besides the point. And I may have read the tone of the question wrong but in my mind the question of whether Hooker should be considered the biggest bust of Holmes tenure is a compliment, not a slight. EVERY GM is going to have busts that they draft. If the biggest one Holmes has so far is a 3rd rounder that many people considered 1st round talent except for the injury, that's not bad at all. Quote
Jason_R Posted August 27 Posted August 27 3 hours ago, Jimbo said: I think the defense definitely can be a top 10 defense. I know we were top 7 in points allowed last year with all the injuries although I don't think the defense was a top 20 defense in true sense. When you have a high scoring efficient offense, the other team doesn't have as much time to score and your field position is constantly bad. I am not taking away from how good they played with all the injuries (I give so much credit to the coaches and players), I just think points allowed isn't always the best indicator. I don't think saying their offense could take a step back from last year and the team being better is taking anything away from there offense. First, they had one of the best offenses ever in the NFL. If they can play 70-90% of what they did last year, then I think this team will be dramatically better with the improvements on defense. I really think (obviously not counting injuries) this defense can be a true top 5-10 defense. With the schedule. I would go with a 12-5 record and winning the north and be a much better team. Don't think they have a chance at the bye this year. Well, you are right that on the one hand they were only 20th in yards allowed, but on the other hand they were 20th in yards allowed. So yes, they were by all available measures a top 20 defense last year, even though they lost a full starting defense to IR by the end of the season. If anything, their high scoring offense contributed to giving up a lot of yards. Every QB they played last year had to try to be Stat Padford. We were all stung by the way the season ended. It will be unlikely that the team faces the worst defensive injury luck possibly in NFL history. Yes, this is a top-20 defense and when all is said and done it is more likely to be the top defense in 2025 than being outside of the top 20 defenses. Quote
KL2 Posted August 27 Posted August 27 2 hours ago, RedRamage said: Probably so far. I'm sure there will be bigger busts at some point, but right now Hooker has to be considered the biggest given where he was selected (3rd) and what production we got out of him (zero). I know a number of people have said he was only a 3rd round and not many of them make it and Brad has lot of other successes... which is all true, but I think that is some what besides the point. And I may have read the tone of the question wrong but in my mind the question of whether Hooker should be considered the biggest bust of Holmes tenure is a compliment, not a slight. EVERY GM is going to have busts that they draft. If the biggest one Holmes has so far is a 3rd rounder that many people considered 1st round talent except for the injury, that's not bad at all. Literally you have to go 100 more picks after him to find an impactful player. He is no way shape or form a bust cause he wasn't picked high enough. He was a lottery ticket. Most don't pan out. He didn't either. Quote
RatkoVarda Posted August 27 Posted August 27 using a 3rd on Hooker was a totally reasonable roll of the dice Quote
RedRamage Posted August 27 Posted August 27 52 minutes ago, KL2 said: Literally you have to go 100 more picks after him to find an impactful player. He is no way shape or form a bust cause he wasn't picked high enough. He was a lottery ticket. Most don't pan out. He didn't either. So are you saying you get good value from a lottery ticket that doesn't win? Look, I fully understand that most draft picks don't end up becoming productive NFL players and even fewer become star players. I'm also not saying that it was a bad gamble. I thought it was a good pick at the time and I supported it. But in hindsight the production we got from the picket was zero. It was a relatively low value we spent on what could have been a very high return. But it didn't work out and therefore it was, ultimately, a bad pick. That doesn't mean Holmes suck. That doesn't mean we shouldn't take risks. That doesn't mean anything more than we put some value into the pick and we got zero out of it. Even a non-impactful player who is a ST guy would have given us more value than Hooker. There's no shame in look at the pick 2.5 years later and saying: "Yep, it was a reasonable gamble, but it didn't pay out so in hindsight we should have done something different." It's okay to call it a bust without saying that Holmes is a bad GM or that he's making bad decisions. Quote
RedRamage Posted August 27 Posted August 27 40 minutes ago, RatkoVarda said: using a 3rd on Hooker was a totally reasonable roll of the dice I absolutely agree. I thought it was a good pick at the time and I still think it was reasonable. Let me try to explain my thoughts another way: There's a $1M lottery with 2 million tickets available for sale and tickets cost $1 each. I'm gonna spend $10K on tickets... oops, none of them won. That was a bad decision and a waste of money. You, on the other hand, spent $3 on tickets and oops, none of them won. That was a bad decision and a waste of money, but it was a low waste. In hindsight we know that you didn't win and if you had that knowledge ahead of time you could have saved yourself $3. So it's still a bad decision, but it's a minor bad decision. Nothing like my $10K bad decision. The reward was high, the risk was relatively low... but in hindsight it was a bad decision. Quote
Motor City Sonics Posted August 27 Posted August 27 2 hours ago, RatkoVarda said: using a 3rd on Hooker was a totally reasonable roll of the dice Yeah, It's a bust, but nothing too team-altering. They gambled on a few players and won so they need to get an L sometimes too. I am on the verge of calling Levi a pretty big bust. You need more out of a 2nd round pick, especially a higher pick. It may be a health thing, but even when he was healthy he didn't seem too impactful. I feel like when you are bad and drafting high, you need more than a rotational guy from the 2nd round. Quote
Jason_R Posted August 27 Posted August 27 Pro Football Reference lists draft picks according to Weighted Average Value. I don't know how it is calculated, but for reference Jahmyr Gibbs shows up as 27, Sam LaPorta as 17, Jack Campbell as 13, Brian Branch as 12. Other notables in that draft are CJ Stroud at 24, Will Anderson at 18, Bijan Robinson at 21. Hendon Hooker shows up at zero. Even Brodric Martin shows up as 1. Of 34 other players drafted behind Hooker in the 3rd round (including comp picks), only three had zero career value. Only three in the 4th round had zero career value. It's not like this part of the draft was a crap shoot. Almost anybody they would have picked other than Hooker would have been a better pick. But Holmes is still on a trajectory to be one of the best drafters in NFL history so... Quote
holygoat Posted August 28 Posted August 28 On 8/26/2025 at 6:27 PM, Motor City Sonics said: I don't think Detroit's defense is anywhere close to the Top 5. I think it could be in the bottom 10, but I guess we'll see. What are you basing bottom 10 on? Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted August 28 Posted August 28 I was OK with the Hooker pick when they took him and even mocked him to the Lions, believing if he fell they could trade back and get him. It was a bad pick, Brad's worse thus far I think. In hindsight, if they were always committed to Goff, than the pick doesn't really make a lot of sense. Were they ever really planning on having Hooker start over Goff and let Jared walk at some point? Given how they've valued Goff, that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't know how much of a need we would have had for a guy like Tank Dell at WR, given the we picked Jaemo, but pre-injury, Dell would have been a better pick. Byron Young at DE would have been a better choice too. Kobie Turner at DE and YaYa Diaby would have been better choices as well. So there were guys there that would have clearly been better picks and fit a need this organization had. Brad should get criticism for the pick as he amounted to less than nothing, but not roasted over it because it's not franchise altering. Quote
Jimbo Posted August 28 Posted August 28 I think there was so much going on with the Hooker pick and really the Martin pick. First was the Goff situation. I think they new he was going to be the guy although I don't think they were 100%. They probably felt like the draft was already solid and they got 4 starters so why not take some chances in the 3rd round. If for some reason Goff had a set back (or was asking for too much $) they had a guy they could develop from the beginning and they could be patient with. It is not easy to determine QBs success in the NFL either. There's just so many factors. I would be curious what the success rate for QB's is. So why not take a chance with a first round talent in the 3rd round when you already have a QB? I also like to look more at the whole draft every year. I consider any draft successful if you can get 2 solid starters (this means for good teams, not a starter because your team is terrible like the Lions have had in the past). I trust the Lions evaluation in practice although I also think QB's need to be in real games to fully be evaluated. Some just are better when put into the fire and as long as Goff stayed healthy he really wasn't going to get his chance. 1 1 Quote
KL2 Posted August 28 Posted August 28 (edited) 19 hours ago, Jason_R said: Pro Football Reference lists draft picks according to Weighted Average Value. I don't know how it is calculated, but for reference Jahmyr Gibbs shows up as 27, Sam LaPorta as 17, Jack Campbell as 13, Brian Branch as 12. Other notables in that draft are CJ Stroud at 24, Will Anderson at 18, Bijan Robinson at 21. Hendon Hooker shows up at zero. Even Brodric Martin shows up as 1. Of 34 other players drafted behind Hooker in the 3rd round (including comp picks), only three had zero career value. Only three in the 4th round had zero career value. It's not like this part of the draft was a crap shoot. Almost anybody they would have picked other than Hooker would have been a better pick. But Holmes is still on a trajectory to be one of the best drafters in NFL history so... But how many of those are ranked just because they are a warm body. Like a WR taken behind hooker, does he have a value of two just cause he saw snaps? If he saw snaps and sucked what does it matter? QB is the only position where mostly just one guy and that's it the entire time. Seems a bit apple to oranges, no? Like Kendre Miller was taken just a couple spots later. He has a weighed value of 3. He has never had more than 150 yards in either season. How much of htat is just him existing versus being a productive player? Edited August 28 by KL2 1 Quote
MichiganCardinal Posted Tuesday at 10:43 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 10:43 PM 2025-2026 Schedule Predictions 1. @ Green Bay Packers - W 23-9 (1-0): Both offenses sputter, but the Lions are better able to capitalize on Love's mistakes. TeSlaa fever reaches a new level as he records his first NFL touchdown, on an end-around run. 2. v. Chicago Bears - W 17-13 (2-0): The offense struggles again, but the defense bails them out as Ben Johnson looks like he has his work cut out for him. A late drive reminiscent of the 2024 offense wins it. 3. @ Baltimore Ravens - L 27-16 (2-1): Lamar runs circles around the Lions, but they keep it closer than they did the last time these teams met. 4. v. Cleveland Browns - W 34-7 (3-1): Game is never close. Hutchinson has a coming out party, recording 5.5 sacks, while the Lions offense finally begins to click on all cylinders. 5. @ Cincinnati Bengals - L 21-17 (3-2): Should be a win but for some unforced errors and self-inflicted mistakes. Goff struggles under some pressure from the interior and throws a costly pick late to seal it. 6. @ Kansas City Chiefs - W 30-27 (OT) (4-2): Goff can't lose to Mahomes, and Campbell can't lose two straight. Great game ends on a 60-yard pass to Jamo for the walk off touchdown in overtime. 7. v. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - W 17-16 (5-2): The offensive line regresses a little bit in another frustrating showing. The Bucs defensive front gives Goff and the run game fits, but the defense bails them out yet again. 8. v. Minnesota Vikings - W 27-24 (6-2): McCarthy makes a mistake with the game tied late, giving up a strip sack to none other than Marcus Davenport, leading to a walk off Jake Bates field goal. 9. BYE 10. @ Washington Commanders - W 38-17 (7-2): The Lions avenge the playoff exit with a resounding win against a Commanders team that is having a disappointing encore season. 11. @ Philadelphia Eagles - L 34-31 (7-3): A back and forth exchange ends in controversial fashion. Fans are left clamoring for a playoff rematch, while NFL executives bend over backwards to explain why the controversial ruling was actually right even though it was obviously wrong. 12. v. New York Giants - W 56-7 (8-3): Lions take out frustrations against their first clearly inferior opponent in two months. Brian Daboll is fired the following Monday. 13. v. Green Bay Packers - W 27-21 (9-3): Jordan Love attempts to replicate his Thanksgiving performance from 2023, but it is becoming clear that he is not the continuation of Favre and Rodgers that he was made out to be. 14. v. Dallas Cowboys - W 35-10 (10-3): Dallas looks awful on national television, while Hutchinson records another three sacks, avenging his broken leg. 15. @ Los Angeles Rams - L 28-24 (10-4): Stafford finally gets his revenge. Close game throughout leaves Lions fans stressing out on 97.1 about their playoff prospects. 16. v. Pittsburgh Steelers - W 30-20 (11-4): Rodgers throws three picks in a fitting sendoff from Ford Field. The final score makes it look closer than it actually was. 17. @ Minnesota Vikings - W 31-23 (12-4): Kevin O'Connell fails to get the Lions monkey off his back as they win yet another close one in a huge game for playoff implications. 18. @ Chicago Bears - W 24-6 (13-4): A meaningless game for the Bears means something for the Lions, who come in and take care of business. Final Record: 13-4 (Home: 8-0, Road: 5-4, Division: 6-0) Quote
MichiganCardinal Posted Tuesday at 11:48 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 11:48 PM Standings Predictions AFC East 1. Buffalo Bills (14-3) *1 2. New England Patriots (7-10) 3. New York Jets (5-12) 4. Miami Dolphins (5-12) AFC North 1. Baltimore Ravens (14-3) *2 2. Cincinnati Bengals (10-7) *6 3. Pittsburgh Steelers (7-10) 4. Cleveland Browns (2-15) AFC South 1. Jacksonville Jaguars (9-8) *4 2. Houston Texans (8-9) 3. Tennessee Titans (6-11) 4. Indianapolis Colts (6-11) AFC West 1. Los Angeles Chargers (12-5) *3 2. Kansas City Chiefs (12-5) *5 3. Denver Broncos (9-8) *7 4. Las Vegas Raiders (5-12) NFC East 1. Philadelphia Eagles (15-2) *1 2. Washington Commanders (9-8) 3. Dallas Cowboys (6-11) 4. New York Giants (4-13) NFC North 1. Detroit Lions (13-4) *2 2. Minnesota Vikings (12-5) *5 3. Green Bay Packers (9-8) 4. Chicago Bears (7-10) NFC South 1. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (11-6) *4 2. Atlanta Falcons (8-9) 3. Carolina Panthers (7-10) 4. New Orleans Saints (2-15) NFC West 1. Los Angeles Rams (11-6) *3 2. Seattle Seahawks (10-7) *6 3. Arizona Cardinals (9-8) *7 4. San Francisco 49ers (8-9) Postseason Predictions AFC Wildcard Weekend (2) Baltimore Ravens over (7) Denver Broncos, 34-10 (3) Los Angeles Chargers over (6) Cincinnati Bengals, 28-24 (5) Kansas City Chiefs over (4) Jacksonville Jaguars, 23-17 BYE: (1) Buffalo Bills NFC Wildcard Weekend (2) Detroit Lions over (7) Arizona Cardinals, 34-16 (3) Los Angeles Rams over (6) Seattle Seahawks, 28-17 (5) Minnesota Vikings over (4) Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 20-14 BYE: (1) Philadelphia Eagles AFC Divisional (1) Buffalo Bills over (5) Kansas City Chiefs, 24-23 (3) Los Angeles Chargers over (2) Baltimore Ravens, 31-27 NFC Divisional (5) Minnesota Vikings over (1) Philadelphia Eagles, 27-24 (2) Detroit Lions over (3) Los Angeles Rams, 34-27 AFC Conference Championship (1) Buffalo Bills over (3) Los Angeles Chargers, 34-30 NFC Conference Championship (2) Detroit Lions over (5) Minnesota Vikings, 31-13 Super Bowl LX in Santa Clara, CA (2N) Detroit Lions over (1A) Buffalo Bills, 27-23 Editor's Note: Originally I had the Bills winning, but then I decided there was no fun in that. Postseason Awards Super Bowl MVP: Jared Goff, Detroit Lions AP MVP: Josh Allen, Buffalo Bills Offensive Player of the Year: Saquon Barkley, Philadelphia Eagles Defensive Player of the Year: Aidan Hutchinson, Detroit Lions Offensive Rookie of the Year: Emeka Egbuka, Tampa Bay Buccaneers Defensive Rookie of the Year: Abdul Carter, New York Giants Comeback Player of the Year: Trevor Lawrence, Jacksonville Jaguars Coach of the Year: Jim Harbaugh, Los Angeles Chargers Coaching Carousel Brian Daboll: Fired midseason Mike McDaniel: Fired postseason Kevin Stefanski: Fired postseason Shane Steichen: Fired postseason Brian Schottenheimer: Fired postseason Sean McVay: "Retires" to a large TV contract Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.