Sports_Freak Posted May 12 Posted May 12 The Tigers have a .463 winning percentage because of injuries. The Mets have a .375 winning percentage because...they suck. So are we gonna get swept? We need that good Flaherty tonight. 1 Quote
Hongbit Posted May 12 Posted May 12 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said: The Tigers have a .463 winning percentage because of injuries. The Mets have a .375 winning percentage because...they suck. So are we gonna get swept? We need that good Flaherty tonight. I’m not sure if the Mets have played a single game with their preferred starting lineup. Soto, Lindor, Robert, and Polanco have all missed significant time already. Edited May 12 by Hongbit Quote
IdahoBert Posted May 12 Posted May 12 McGonigle SS Vierling CF Keith DH Greene, R LF Dingler C Pérez, W RF Workman 3B Torkelson 1B McKinstry 2B Quote
chasfh Posted May 12 Posted May 12 My Mets friend is salivating a bit because he knows the Tigers are struggling through injuries and losing, and the Mets are a heady 5-5 in their last 10, so yeah, I would like the Tigers to stick it up his butt. 😁 Quote
NorthWoods Posted May 12 Posted May 12 1 hour ago, IdahoBert said: McGonigle SS Vierling CF Keith DH Greene, R LF Dingler C Pérez, W RF Workman 3B Torkelson 1B McKinstry 2B I see 3RBI in that lineup for Workman. Quote
Crazy Cat Gentleman Posted May 12 Posted May 12 (edited) Wenceel singles, Workman doubles, Tork SF makes it 2-0. Edited May 12 by Crazy Cat Gentleman Quote
Sports_Freak Posted May 12 Posted May 12 Watching Flaherty is like watching grass grow...or paint dry. Nibble away until everyone is asleep. Quote
Sports_Freak Posted May 13 Posted May 13 Whoever this umpire is, he's bad. Missing a lot of calls. Quote
Crazy Cat Gentleman Posted May 13 Posted May 13 2 minutes ago, IdahoBert said: I’m not liking this game. I'm mostly just not liking Jack. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.