Until the steroid guys contemporaries are on the committee (the guys who played in the 1990-2000's, i.e., Jeter, Ortiz, etc...), I don't see them getting in. No way that the pre-steroid era guys would allow them in--Tram, Sandberg, Morris, etc...
It’s been said before, but I love having a shitty, beat-up Rams #1 pick so I can enjoy each Lions win and care less about our own pick potentially falling outside of the top-15.
40 points is impressive, but holding the Jags to 14 (so far) is equally impressive, especially when you consider our defensive issues earlier in the season.
If you follow the flawed logic, it’s because we don’t have his replacement already identified by December 4th. Which probably means we won’t be able to find a suitable successor. We’re completely screwed now.
Respectfully disagree with your interpretation of risk. Holding on to the same player, who you have control over, is taking very little risk.
Dumping that same underperforming player with the idea that you have an entire offseason to replace that anemic performance is really not much of a risk, either, as Candy set an incredibly low bar to improve upon.
And it’s a lazy and uninformed take to suggest that the Tigers are going on the cheap because they refused to give a raise to a crappy employee.
Not sure why Reynolds is asking for a trade—could be a personality conflict or just sick of playing on a shitty team. If it’s the latter, he wouldn’t be happy here, either.
We don’t have the assets to get a player of his caliber anyway.
Harris is gonna have to McGuyver this roster for the next couple of seasons. Is Scott Hatteberg still playing?
I’ll bet our 3B is someone we haven’t even considered yet, like a DJ LeMaheiu-type veteran that we get in a salary dump trade, where we don’t need to give up much, or get a nice prospect in the package.
Let me help you make sense of the decision not to give Jeimer a raise: .217 batting average and .633 OPS. Pretty sure that Zach Short could give us that.
You guys are like a bunch of millennials who expect a participation trophy for each of our players. Personally, I don’t want to sit through another bullshit season with the same group of underperformers.
I think it would have been irresponsible to give him a raise based on his sub-par 2022 performance. What kind of message does that send to fans and the org?
well, if we're to take Harris at his word around prioritizing players who have a good knowledge of the strike zone, I think that's what he will strive for.
I'm not the least bit upset losing any of the players we've moved on from. what's Einstein's definition of insanity? doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
I wish we could have moved on from Schoop, as well.