buddha

if only we actually traded for a young nba player....

they traded kevin knox for an older, slightly better version of kevin knox. and threw in a second round pick and another italian to boot. seems like shuffling the deck chairs on the titanic. sure, the new chair has a more comfy cushion, but youre still on a sinking boat. they've traded bagley, livers, knox, a "prospect" and three second round picks for rhe corpse of danilo galinari, waiver fodder mike muscala, and a 28 year old italian shooter. i wonder if theyre adding him because of his salary to put him in another deal? how many more second round picks can we give up to get salary?

i think the talent will win out in the end. i think the flyers drop. the pens probably catch them. i hope the devils stay hurt. my realistic hope for the wings is the 2nd wild card. i just think the leafs have too much talent up front. lightning too.

devils, pens, and flyers all win tonight. boo.

might as well start a new thread...

dont tell troy.

not tall enough. what's hasheem thabeet doing?

youre calling a deadline trade for the former #2 pick in the draft a huge disappointment? lol.

no ****, kevin pelton. you could have asked most of us at the time and we would have told you that was a ****ty trade. shame it took this long to figure it out.

the nfl salary cap is too complicated for us mere mortals who dont have all the details to figure out. with that said, tater's estimations are way too optimistic.

a court ruled the same way in 2015 with northwestern.

neither sutton nor mosely were #1 corners. that's why they wanted witherspoon in the draft.

nobody wanted lavine so he decided to have surgery. the bulls have done so much better without him. FOR A REASON! he's a cancer. a bad player. a selfish suck on the team. do. not. trade. for. lavine.

jaylon johnson will not be a free agent. they will franchise him. sneed is unlikely to be either, but the chiefs have cap choices to make aince mahomes makes so much money. dont know about fuller. the usual rule is that really good players dont make it to free agency. usually, free agency is to build depth and fill holes, not to bring in difference makers.

trade him for what? you'd have to retain 50% salary at a minimum. he isnt playing well, wjy would another team want him?

i would argue that he's building the organization the only way you can without lottery luck: depth and youth.

if they dont deal bogey for a first round pick im going to scream. he's got to warrant a first rounder with the way he's shooting.

why do you want to trade kane? he's one of our best players. thryre trying to make the playoffs this year. unless they have a disastrous february like they had a disastrous december, i dont see them dealing kane or ghost. but im still holding out for our unicorn scenario where we trade them and then deal assets for stars! dare to dream! 84lives for GM! 🙂

me too. that's half the fun! 🙂

all of us with our galaxy brain ideas of trading ghost and kane and then trading FOR another star isnt going to happen. the world doesnt work like us working our trade machines on espn.

theyre not trading kane.

nice bench.

i dont know if edvinsson will be better than gotisbehere, but you definitely present the dream case.

again, all this talk about how a player isnt worth x, y, z forgets that this is the trade deadline and all the contenders will overpay for spare parts. the idea that youre going to get a good player for cheap or for marginal prospects is fools gold.

monahan to the jets for a first round pick.