buddha

hope he didnt break his kneecap

hard core gamblers will gamble. casual gamblers will gamble if theyre watching a game. if the game is boring, they wont watch and wont gamble. also, baseball has a vested interest in growing their audience. 3 30 games are a hindrance to that. faster games will likely spur interest. despite the sentiment around here, baseball has more interests than just those of fan duel.

then why would they do it if big gambling was so against it?

then why did they do it if big gambling would supposedly be so against it?

the obsession with "what the gambling companies" think is weird. i was told that this would never happen because of the "gambling companies" and now it has. so....

best shape of his career!!

killer. amd pittsburgh won in ot, and ottawa is going to win too. these next two in ottawa might be the most important of the season. they need at least 3 points.

did anyone watch this game? did james wiseman really foul out in 20 minutes? sounds like marvin had a nice game and ivey woke up and decided to do his best killian hayes impression this morning.

do you think the pistons have been a well run organization during tom gores' tenure?

for example: the most rushing attempts fran tarkenton ever had was 41 in one season. he averaged about 20 a season. jalen hurts had 165 last season. even playing 5 or 6 more games a year thats a massive difference.

the vikings 1970s offense was not built on tarketon running run/pass options. it was built on handing the ball to foreman and throwing downfield. tarketon was a scrambler. so was staubach. but it wasnt like offense today.

none. although gores did get a nice banner of himself out of it.

this is very different from tarkenton.

goff seems like a really good guy and people like him. they say he's sensitive and has some confidence issues, which is another reason why i dont think they'll draft a qb early. i wouldnt be surprised to see them take one late. just to hold a clipboard.

wentz has also turned about to be a clubhouse cancer, so that could have played a role in it too.

perhaps the eagles saw the evolution of the qb position and how a mobile qb could open up the offense? i dont know, but that seems to be the way the league is going. which doesnt mean you cant win with a statue at qb (see brady, tom), but i think its undeniable that a mobile qb opens up different things for your offense and makes it harder to play against. college isnt a great comparable to the pros, but michigan's offense this year is just such an example. again, not a reason to move on from goff, nor does it say goff isnt capable of winning, but just that the leahue may be changing and the next generation of qbs might be different than the last.

exactly.

im saying those numbers do not show that those passers were good at deep balls. jarad goff had a good season last year. ben johnson had an AMAZING season last year and that's why jarad goff's stats look better this year. goff deserves a lot of credit and was a good qb last year, let's not go crazy and say that he was one of the best at something (deep passes) that our eyes can tell us he wasnt.

here ya go. he was 32nd. ahead of only huntley and darnold. and well behind such great nfl passers as justin fields.

tyler heincke? matt ryan? sam darnold? this is what happens when you quote some statistic as meaningful without any context.

so the best deep ball passers in the nfl are tua, tyler heincke, geno smith, matt ryan(!), and sam darnold. come on now....

hopefully.

good. get your ass in the box and hit.

another good game to lose.