buddha

wallinder wins top u20 player in sweden. following in seider's footsteps...

of course they won.

one of our mayoral candidates was paying for people's gas. he would announce that he was giving out free gas at gas station x and there would be a line of cars miles ling waiting to get there the next day. he did it for a few days.

illinois did the same thing. theyre all doing it. means almost nothing to consumers but will leave big holes in the road budget.

lol. wtf was that?

im flying to cleveland on thursday. i'll bring my masks so i can use them after i land...

the thing is, these regulations were going to expire in two weeks anyway. this judge jumped the gun. biden could have immediately appraled it and had an injunction issued. but they didnt. why not? because they want them to expire. and the cdc wants them to expire becaude the airlines want them to expire. i dont see any way you bring them back now. you can wear a mask if you want, but nobody will make you do it.

they dont do much more than nothing. next thing you know, you'll tell me that if i text during takeoff the plane will crash. should airlines make everyone wear a gas mask or a haz mat suit? should they make everyone show a negative test result for any contagious disease before boarding a plane? should they put a camera in the bathroom or sensors to make sure everyone washes their hands properly before leaving the restroom? should we all submit to dna tests to make sure were not susceptible to certain diseases before they board any plane? we can go back and forth in this game all day. how far should we go as a society to make sure people dont get sick when around other people? what's the line? you have a different risk tolerance than i do.

cloth masks do nothing, should we require all airlines to have each passenger wear an n95? where is your level of risk and what society should require of people to mitigate that risk? like you said, its a sliding scale.

people can catch the flu on an airplane and die from it, so everyone that gets on a plane must wear a mask forever because someone on the plane might get sick.

i wouldnt take willis either at 2.

the argument FOR masks on planes would probably center around foreign travel, maybe? that youre bringing in outside variants and viruses from other countries? but that happens a lot. where's the end game? i imagine there are people who will continue to wear masks everywhere for the rest of their lives now.

that's really the argument for willis at #2. you wont get another chance unless you want to trade your whole draft for him.

maybe. but there will be a number of other teams that need a qb and think the same way. unless the lions go 3-14, they will be giving up at least 3 number one picks to move up. if they have the team around that qb to do it, then by all means "f them picks." but they wont be the only bidder, and teams at the top may want qbs themselves and be unwilling to deal.

that's a good point.

https://www.iata.org/en/youandiata/travelers/health/low-risk-transmission/ quality of supplied air on board an aircraft is much better than most indoor environments. This along with other cabin features including the mandatory usage of masks on board and the requirements around tests and/or vaccination certificates, make the risk of contracting COVID-19 to be very low. Nonetheless, here are some features about the cabin air quality.

do you think there should be masks in bars?

when do you think the risk will the risk be small enough? i think its small enough right now. especially on a plane.

matt corral = baker mayfield. john dorsey took baker mayfield #1. does he pound the table for corral at 32?

me neither. and they fog up my glasses. the entire point of mask mandates was that they would stop transmission of a deadly virus that was going to overwhelm the health care system. the health care system is no longer in any danger of being overwhelmed. we have treatment options for covid. we no longer require them in bars or restaurants. we dont require them at concerts. we dont require them at ANY indoor gatherings other than on planes and in transit centers. yet, there is little to no evidence that the virus passes on planes and certainly no evidence that is passes greater on planes than in other indoor spaces. so why keep the mandate on planes? i doubt this would even be a discussion among the left members of this board if the cdc had changed its guidelines, which is was going to do soon anyway.

i mentioned many times about the air filtration systems in planes. so did edman if you'd rather believe him. i asked you a separate question about bars, not as a deflection because i already answered your other question. so what do you think about masks in bars?

but ted kulfan has an article up about how great suter has been... lol.

or a speed car that can take me to cali in less than 5 hours. if there is little to no scientific evidence to support a mask mandate on planes, then why have it? its not just a minor inconvenience to wear an n95 for 4 hours. its hard to breathe. if there isnt any point in doing it, then they should rescind the rule. and in reality, they were going to rescind it. but the cdc is a bureaucracy and they havent gotten around to it yet. the courts beat them to it. the biden administration will wait a couple weeks and see how this goes and test the public's reaction and then decide whether to pursue an appeal.

its the same argument in restaurants! you walk in with a mask and then take it off when you sit down. there is no logic to it.

do you think we should have mask mandates in bars?