KL2

You jeep schoop because of the possible upside. You don't have to give him a long leash, but if he hits a bit you can trade him. Thats valuable to the rebuild. Just let krider start in toldeo, see how schoop does and make the call may 1.

Theilen?

Can we fire weaver and Casey yet?

see?

Yeah cause he wasn't being tripple teamed or anything like that. I'm sorry his production in 3 years blew out Adian's production in four. Get out of here with his stats were never elite.

I'm sorry, but what the hell are you talking about. 47TFL 24 Sacks in three years. That blows out the totals Adian had in four years.

Yeah nobody is disputing that trades happen. And nobody is diputing that ther have been draft when qbs go high. But both at the same time? Can't think of it. I just don't envision this bidding war others do with 6 teams clamoring to move up to three to get the third rated qb on their board.

Sorry quoted the wrong post

I think some of the concerns with a qb needing team trading up are overblown. At best they are getting the third rated qb. They will have the same concerns all of us have about the guys. Are they really gonna mortgage the future on that guy? Plus I can't remember a year where there were a bunch of trade ups into the top five for four qbs. This ain't the 2004 class.

Any parent rumbling about bad calls as 12 year Olds and under play a game should recheck their priorities.

No but also counting on 4 rookies to make an immediate impact is also not a good strategy either.

That's how most nfl contracts are. I'll gues something like 3 million is given upfront so his cap hit this year is like 3 million, next year 6.5 million and then big money I'm year three with 1 million in dead cap.

49ers probably ahead But you could make the case lions, cowboys are the next in line.

Which is weird cause they loved the signing of crappier running backs by other teams.

I bet it would cost the twos especially cause other teams might be bidding to get ahead of the colts and Arizona knows what your going for. But it's also why I added that mid pick going back. Seems entirely reasonable and fair on both sides.

It seems more likely with the signings. Give up 6 and the two twos for like 3 and a fifth round. Anderson Guard LB With picks in first 100 and call it a day

Cb out...rb out Say hello to tackle and tight end in round 1!

"The team could have had more rushing yards with more broken tackles" Ya think?!

There's what like 10 games left in spring? They weren't gonna make the team cause they have limited minors success. There is no reason to rush em, remember when the team put up tork last year? Let them go down, play everyday and improve. Sending them down now frees up spring at bats for the guys who need to get ready and for guys on the fence like badooo.

Amatuer

Been a fun few days for waller, must feel like teams have his back: Plan to marry a woman who plays basketball in the same town but want to keep it secret. Coach outs your plan to the media Complain Get your butt traded clear across the country 11 days after your wedding.

The attention whore level is off the charts. Even the Kardashians are like s*** or get off the pot!

It is useless, sorry. There is no weight for a first round pick versus a late round pick. There is no consieration for whether a player makes a team. The sample size is too small and having a pro-bowler could easily impact the decision. Let's look at some possible scnerios. The Cardinals have pick 210, they take a QB knowing they would like to find a third QB for the roster for camp to take the load of Murray. They take one, he doens't make the team but is put on the practice squad for six games and is cut. Then who cares? The Eagles landed two good receivers in teh draft 6 years ago and now are paying them each $15 million. They have decided to dedicate money elsewhere so for backups they just keep using low round picks on WR and churring through them in two years and letting them go. There are too many items that can throw this report into wacko land and dramtically increase or decrease percentages. That is what makes it usueless. It lacks any context or weight as we know first round picks are more targeted selections than a seven round guy when many teams might take an 8th or 9th guy and he has no real shot to make a roster. And yeah I knew WR was where they invested the most when you break it down like this. Most teams will carry what 6 guys and maybe a kick returner that is usually a WR. That is what like 14 percent of the entire roster so it makes sense they spent draft capital there. It would probably be Oline, but the survey broke down T, G, C while not breaking down inside or outside WR.

Meh a fairly useless chart

The good news is he'd be backup on all those teams too