Detroit Sports Net (was: The impending death of Bally Sports)

[Tigerbomb13]

43 minutes ago, Tenacious D said:

Where did you find this?  Didn’t see an app in the IOS store

It basically uses the MLB app. I googled where to sign up and it goes through mlb.com. 

[HeyAbbott]

I cut the cord long ago, so my Baseball has come through Fanduel/Bally sports streaming in the past. I went through the maze on MLB.com the first or second day it was available and signed up. It has worked on my Samsung phone perfectly through the MLB app, and my TV as well.

On my Samsung 65" 4K TV (2024 Vintage), I simply searched for the MLB app, found and installed it on the TV . I logged into the app on my tv, and scanned the displayed QR Code and activated the app. That was it, It found the DSN subscription and has worked perfectly ever since. The picture quality is fantastic, and it looks like a 4K signal, although I'm not totally sure. The pricing is identical to my last year's Fanduel subscription.

Between over the air, streaming, and Samsung TV which come through my internet connection on the TV, I am just shy of 500 channels plus the streaming. Life is good.

Edited 19 hours ago by HeyAbbott
Grammar error.

[Sports_Freak]

2 minutes ago, HeyAbbott said:

I cut the cord long ago, so my Baseball has come through Fanduel/Bally sports streaming in the past. I went through the maze on MLB.com the first or second day and signed up. It has worked on my Samsung phone perfectly through the MLB app.

On my Samsung 65" 4K TV (2024 Vintage), I simply searched for the MLB app, found and installed it on the TV . I logged into the app on My tv, and scanned the displayed QR Code and activated the app. That was it, It found the DSN subscription and has worked perfectly ever since. The picture quality is fantastic, and it looks like a 4K signal, although I'm not totally sure. The pricing is identical to my last year's Fanduel subscription.

Between over the air, streaming, and Samsung TV which come through my internet connection on the TV, I am just shy of 500 channels plus the streaming.

I also have a 65" Samsung and I swear it has a much better picture watching the MLB app than all of the other streaming channels. Crystal clear. And I had the same easy time installing the MLB app and getting the Detroit feed. 

[Edman85]

6 hours ago, RedRamage said:

Anyone know what the rules are in terms of multiple live views at the same time? I'm asking for... uh... for a  friend... yeah...

Seriously though my brother subscribed to Bally/FanDuel for the RedWings games and shared it with my Mother so she could watch the Tigers and they split the cost. Given that it was just the two of them and Bally/FanDuel apparently allowed two simultaneous views that worked out well for them. Can you do the same thing with DSN?

If it's anything like MLB.TV, my brother and my dad have mine and I run into issues sometimes, but not often. If I do, I just call them and remind them whose password it is and who is the bigger Tigers fan, and they drop off 😄

[chasfh]

15 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:

I also have a 65" Samsung and I swear it has a much better picture watching the MLB app than all of the other streaming channels. Crystal clear. And I had the same easy time installing the MLB app and getting the Detroit feed. 

I do believe that throughout the HD era, networks and providers have routinely cheaped out on signal transmission to save bandwidth and money. The poor resolution of some so-called HD signals is appalling, so when we see an excellent crystal-clear signal such as in last night’s Netflix game—the signal quality they promised us with HD back around 2000 in the first place—it really stands out.

[oblong]

There's no escape from the gambling....

[chasfh]

1 hour ago, oblong said:

There's no escape from the gambling....

Ahh, **** me blue.

[Sports_Freak]

2 hours ago, chasfh said:

I do believe that throughout the HD era, networks and providers have routinely cheaped out on signal transmission to save bandwidth and money. The poor resolution of some so-called HD signals is appalling, so when we see an excellent crystal-clear signal such as in last night’s Netflix game—the signal quality they promised us with HD back around 2000 in the first place—it really stands out.

Lol...that's funny. I remember, in the very early days, home Tiger games would be in hi-def. But road games would be in the letter box 4:3 ratio. It always disappointed me...knowing a better picture was possible.

[Edman85]

22 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Ahh, **** me blue.

Be careful. The sportsbooks will probably do that.

[ewsieg]

On 3/21/2026 at 8:25 AM, Biff Mayhem said:

ATT air vs Starlink

 

 

Those ping times, while high compared to Fiber/Cable, are incredible.  I had a customer that used Hughes Satellite internet for backup and we'd see a 700-800ms, sometimes up to 900ms.  They say the average human doesn't start to realize slowness in browsing until you get past the 100-120ms mark.  

[ewsieg]

And not that I want to defend my competitor, but those AT&T numbers aren't that bad either (subjective based on the area (rural/urban).  We have several years before the cellular wifi at home solutions are able to truly compete with fiber/cable.  It's still a great and cheaper option for many that don't utilize their Internet all that much.