Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, CMRivdogs said:

Thank you Amy..for now

 

 

If even a blue state ever tries to fund a madrasa with state funds, there will be vandalism and politicians thrown out of office.

Posted

corny barret will be able to find the history and tradition in federal funding of religious schools that apparently remains unfound

Posted
1 hour ago, pfife said:

corny barret will be able to find the history and tradition in federal funding of religious schools that apparently remains unfound

I'm waiting to see if with Thomas and Alito being so far out into space, and Gorsuch being such a philosophical unicorn, whether Barrett will end up being drawn toward the other women on the court over time.

Posted

There were two dissents, but what is the logic of saying the exec can't change a status that it had the sole discretion to confer in the 1st place? It's exactly that kind form of logic that underpins bad decisions like Citizens United (e.g. a corporation is a creation of statute law that the court put beyond the reach of statute law).  I'd love for there to be a better strategy to stop the cruelty of this admin than asking the court to practice bad logic.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
9 minutes ago, smr-nj said:

Supreme Court oversteps- narrows power of lower courts.

Absolutely criminal power grab.

Disturbing. Disgusting. Damn them.

Both sides have railed against nationwide injunctions.   

Posted
Quote

Justice Jackson in dissent: "The Court's decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law."
Jackson: "Eventually, executive power will become completely uncontainable, and our beloved constitutional Republic will be no more."

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, RatkoVarda said:

multiple nationwide injunctions OK for Biden, but not for our Orange God.

that's the whole decision.

Take a look at Garland v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc.

 

Posted

My father is 96 but his dad arrived in the United States from the UK in 1901 and may not have received US citizenship (he was a US Army veteran of WW1).  So, Dad now 96 years old may have to go to South Sudan or El Salvador until his vague US Citizenship status (he was an USAF officer during the Korean War).  Damn shame these cheaters, cheating the system.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...