chasfh Posted February 4 Author Posted February 4 Top export trading partner for each U.S. state. 2 Quote
Dan Gilmore Posted February 4 Posted February 4 What’s the deal with Utah? We know they’re not bring in Scotch and Guinesss. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted February 4 Author Posted February 4 5 minutes ago, Dan Gilmore said: What’s the deal with Utah? We know they’re not bring in Scotch and Guinesss. Maybe they are big fans of haggis and mushy peas. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted February 9 Posted February 9 (edited) This may already have been posted. Track the path of a single raindrop from anywhere in the world https://river-runner-global.samlearner.com/?ref=readtangle.com Edited February 9 by CMRivdogs 1 Quote
chasfh Posted August 3 Author Posted August 3 Here's an even better one: America’s Drunkest & Driest Counties Based On Excessive Drinking. Are buying Wisconsin? The map above shows the drunkest and driest US counties based on the share of excessive drinkers. The drunkest is Gallatin, MT where 26.8% of people are excessive drinkers. And the driest is Utah, UT where only 9.04% of people are excessive drinkers. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted August 3 Posted August 3 Gallatin is the northern gateway to Yellowstone Nat Park. Gorgeous country but I can imagine winters can be brutal. I wonder how many of those surveyed are tourists Quote
romad1 Posted August 4 Posted August 4 15 hours ago, CMRivdogs said: Gallatin is the northern gateway to Yellowstone Nat Park. Gorgeous country but I can imagine winters can be brutal. I wonder how many of those surveyed are tourists Native Americans are a larger percentage of the pop in the West. Wisconsin and some areas of Vermont show the correlation and direct causality between excessive cheese eating and alcoholism. 1 Quote
Motown Bombers Posted August 4 Posted August 4 18 hours ago, chasfh said: Here's an even better one: America’s Drunkest & Driest Counties Based On Excessive Drinking. Are buying Wisconsin? The map above shows the drunkest and driest US counties based on the share of excessive drinkers. The drunkest is Gallatin, MT where 26.8% of people are excessive drinkers. And the driest is Utah, UT where only 9.04% of people are excessive drinkers. Green is the driest? I wouldn't have expected Las Vegas to be green. Quote
chasfh Posted Friday at 05:17 PM Author Posted Friday at 05:17 PM Countries Where More People Died Than Were Born In 2024 Quote
chasfh Posted Friday at 05:45 PM Author Posted Friday at 05:45 PM I would like to see something like this for US congressional districts. Median Gross Household Income In Great Britain By Parliamentary Constituency Quote
Edman85 Posted Friday at 07:52 PM Posted Friday at 07:52 PM Your title says median, the graph says average. Which is it? Quote
chasfh Posted Friday at 08:23 PM Author Posted Friday at 08:23 PM 31 minutes ago, Edman85 said: Your title says median, the graph says average. Which is it? I copied the headline which says median, so, who knows. It's probably median, though, which is typically how income is reported. Quote
mtutiger Posted Saturday at 03:10 AM Posted Saturday at 03:10 AM (edited) On 8/3/2025 at 3:05 PM, chasfh said: Here's an even better one: America’s Drunkest & Driest Counties Based On Excessive Drinking. Are buying Wisconsin? The map above shows the drunkest and driest US counties based on the share of excessive drinkers. The drunkest is Gallatin, MT where 26.8% of people are excessive drinkers. And the driest is Utah, UT where only 9.04% of people are excessive drinkers. Some of the differences are policy related between states, but whenever you see such hard cutoffs between states, some of that has to be differences in data collection / lack of normalization. I'm not convinced that Walworth County, Wisconsin is orders of magnitude more drunk than McHenry County, Illinois, despite the two sharing a pretty decent amount of border with one another. Edited Saturday at 03:11 AM by mtutiger Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Saturday at 01:04 PM Posted Saturday at 01:04 PM (edited) 16 hours ago, chasfh said: I copied the headline which says median, so, who knows. It's probably median, though, which is typically how income is reported. I would guess median also just because the ranges seem too small to be averages for the ritzy parts of London where a few billionaires would tend to skew averages strongly. Edited Saturday at 01:05 PM by gehringer_2 Quote
chasfh Posted Saturday at 01:55 PM Author Posted Saturday at 01:55 PM 51 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: I would guess median also just because the ranges seem too small to be averages for the ritzy parts of London where a few billionaires would tend to skew averages strongly. Maybe it's because the London billionaires make their money in rubles and not pounds ... Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Saturday at 02:00 PM Posted Saturday at 02:00 PM 4 minutes ago, chasfh said: Maybe it's because the London billionaires make their money in rubles and not pounds ... LOL - yes, there's that! Quote
romad1 Posted Saturday at 05:41 PM Posted Saturday at 05:41 PM 4 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: I would guess median also just because the ranges seem too small to be averages for the ritzy parts of London where a few billionaires would tend to skew averages strongly. The amount of residual wealth in southern England is silly. The empire was very nice to a lot of people. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.