Jump to content

April Game Thread


Recommended Posts

TBF, the old-guys are just place holders, someone has to play the minutes, but was is depressing is that they need to be having at least one good young player come up every season and it was nearly two full seasons from Raymond and Seider to Edvinsson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

.... They really don't belong in the playoffs, but if Larkin can will them there they may get there.

The schedule favors them.

The Islanders and Penguins have to run near-impossible gauntlets to get/ stay in the playoff race...

Detroit has a relatively easy schedule and critical point games against the Caps & Penguins... so they at least control their fate.

Flyers and Caps have slightly more difficult schedules and face each other the last game of the season.

The remaining schedules, at least how they look...

Favor the Red Wings' playoff chances over the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, 1984Echoes said:

The schedule favors them.

The Islanders and Penguins have to run near-impossible gauntlets to get/ stay in the playoff race...

Detroit has a relatively easy schedule and critical point games against the Caps & Penguins... so they at least control their fate.

Flyers and Caps have slightly more difficult schedules and face each other the last game of the season.

The remaining schedules, at least how they look...

Favor the Red Wings' playoff chances over the others.

I haven't given up, but I don't think a team that has lost 13 of their past 17 games has earned the right to be favored over anyone at this point. In addition to will they or won't they make the playoffs, the other question to debate is whether, if the Wings miss the playoffs, this will going down as the biggest collapse in Red Wings history, at least in the post-Original Six era. I'd say yes.  For the regular season, there's no doubt. If including playoffs, the Wings definitely have been on the receiving end of some upsets like Sharks in '94 and Flames in '04, but I think this March-April stretch has been as bad as it gets.

Edited by lordstanley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always dangerous to see your team play a team that is as much better than there are as the Rangers are than the Wings. Probably more depressing that the situation really is, but you got the sense watching that game the Rangers has so much in tank they knew they could score pretty much whenever they flipped the switch to high gear and there was nothing the Wings would be able to do about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Points since February 28:

Carolina- 27

Dallas - 26

NYR- 25

Colorado - 25

Tampa- 24

Nashville - 24

Boston - 23

Los Angeles - 23

Toronto -21

St. Louis - 21

NYI - 21

Pittsburgh- 21

Buffalo- 21

Vancouver - 19

Florida- 19

Winnipeg - 19

Vegas - 19

Minnesota - 19

Washington- 19

Arizona - 18

Seattle -17

Ottawa- 17

Montreal- 16

Philadelphia -  14

Columbus - 14

Chicago - 14

New Jersey- 12

Anaheim - 11

Calgary - 10

Detroit- 10

San Jose - 7

 

image.png

Edited by lordstanley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, lordstanley said:

Points since February 28:

Carolina- 27

Dallas - 26

NYR- 25

Colorado - 25

Tampa- 24

Nashville - 24

Boston - 23

Los Angeles - 23

Toronto -21

St. Louis - 21

NYI - 21

Pittsburgh- 21

Buffalo- 21

Vancouver - 19

Florida- 19

Winnipeg - 19

Vegas - 19

Minnesota - 19

Washington- 19

Arizona - 18

Seattle -17

Ottawa- 17

Montreal- 16

Philadelphia -  14

Columbus - 14

Chicago - 14

New Jersey- 12

Anaheim - 11

Calgary - 10

Detroit- 10

San Jose - 7

 

image.png

and all the hockey stat boy know it alls were crowing after that hawks win in ot that the wings were a lock for the playoffs.

one larkin injury later and were back to looking at lottery odds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, buddha said:

and all the hockey stat boy know it alls were crowing after that hawks win in ot that the wings were a lock for the playoffs.

one larkin injury later and were back to looking at lottery odds.

There was no reason at all to think that a team that was #11 overall in points, a strong goal differential, 4th overall in goals scored, had plenty of scoring depth,  veteran experience, and started 2024 at 16-4-2 …would then be a bottom 3 team for the next 17 games. If they had simply matched Arizona, Montreal, Chicago or Columbus over that span they’d be sitting pretty for a playoff spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, lordstanley said:

There was no reason at all to think that a team that was #11 overall in points, a strong goal differential, 4th overall in goals scored, had plenty of scoring depth,  veteran experience, and started 2024 at 16-4-2 …would then be a bottom 3 team for the next 17 games. If they had simply matched Arizona, Montreal, Chicago or Columbus over that span they’d be sitting pretty for a playoff spot. 

sure, but their underlying numbers appeared to show a team that was punching above its weight.

and so it turned out to be.

that said, it was a stunning collapse.  made even more stunning because it came largely against some of the worst teams in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, buddha said:

sure, but their underlying numbers appeared to show a team that was punching above its weight.

and so it turned out to be.

that said, it was a stunning collapse.  made even more stunning because it came largely against some of the worst teams in the league.

Right. And disappointingly, the only real difference Larkin's return has made is that they've won at least a few games here and there and they've been more competitive in most games. 4-11-2 over 17 games and I think Larkin missed just 8? So maybe 3-4-2 in the two games before he got hurt + the games since his return. Still not very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, buddha said:

chairot was in the box or else he would have been out there.

True, but whatever the reason, it was the first time I'd seem them on the ice together. The one thing that Edvinsson's handling seems to say is that Yzerman is more serious about player development than the Wing's short term win total. To me it's clear Edvinsson would have improved this team if he had been called up well before he was - I can only conclude he wasn't because he hadn't hit some targets they had established for him in GR and that was judged to be more important. Or maybe just more important until it began to look the wings might actually miss the playoff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      256
    • Most Online
      186

    Newest Member
    M Ruge
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...