Trumps Presidency 2025

[Tigeraholic1]

She blocks the road then her wife gets out to film her agitate.

 

Edited 16 hours ago by Tigeraholic1

[pfife]

grok video

[Edman85]

8 hours ago, guy incognito said:

 

[pfife]

Its never not funny

[RatkoVarda]

8 hours ago, Tigerbomb13 said:

Scary stuff. How did we get here?

a black guy twice got elected POTUS

[Tigerbomb13]

1 hour ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

She blocks the road then her wife gets out to film her agitate.

 

You had to post a doctored video to try and prove your point the first time, so keep trying. 

[pfife]

Shocking that the dude who supports the GOP Pedophile Protection Program also supports the GOP Murderer Protection Program.

[The Ronz]

We've always been here.

Handicapped people were legally deprived an education until the 1975 Education for All Handicapped Children Act.

Handicapped people were legally deprived the right to work until the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.

DEI is actually DEIA - the A being accessibility.

Handicapped people are even excluded from the hatred of DEI. 😉

 

[pfife]

2 minutes ago, The Ronz said:

We've always been here.

Handicapped people were legally deprived an education until the 1975 Education for All Handicapped Children Act.

Handicapped people were legally deprived the right to work until the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.

DEI is actually DEIA - the A being accessibility.

Handicapped people are even excluded from the hatred of DEI. 😉

 

I wish we could like posts more than once. 

[oblong]

But remember, he is the way he is because he didn't agree with the way Kamala Harris got the nomination.  That was the tipping point.   Fascism because of a process disagreement.  Makes total sense.

[romad1]

Post by @victinibcn.bsky.social — Bluesky

I like this guy

[Tigerbomb13]

3 minutes ago, romad1 said:

Post by @victinibcn.bsky.social — Bluesky

I like this guy

This guy is amazing 

[romad1]

manifest

[romad1]

America right now

 

[romad1]

Must admire the technical skill of the Stasi guy here with the one hand pistol shot at that range.  Besides the absolute evil of shooting a woman in the back of course. 

 

[Tigerbomb13]

16 minutes ago, romad1 said:

manifest

I hope he’s correct here 

[romad1]

Just now, Tigerbomb13 said:

I hope he’s correct here 

If there were No Kings protests called for this weekend I suspect high turnout.  We got close to the 3.5% threshold in October.  The cold weather might prove a damper but...people are mad at this lawless bull****. 

[Tigerbomb13]

Party of fascists 

[romad1]

 

[Tigerbomb13]

17 minutes ago, romad1 said:

If there were No Kings protests called for this weekend I suspect high turnout.  We got close to the 3.5% threshold in October.  The cold weather might prove a damper but...people are mad at this lawless bull****. 

A lot of people expected at this tonight 

[Tigeraholic1]

1 hour ago, Tigerbomb13 said:

You had to post a doctored video to try and prove your point the first time, so keep trying. 

Its from CNN..... Everything is doctored when we don't like the message.

[Tigerbomb13]

The best analysis I’ve seen is the one done by the NYT. As you can see, the wheels were turned before she was shot to move away from the officer. People are going to want to believe what they want to believe and allow this administration to gaslight them, but it is what it is. 
 

https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000010631041/minneapolis-ice-shooting-video.html?smid=url-share&smid=nytcore-ios-share

[guy incognito]

https://www.threads.com/@hereswhykevin/post/DTRmsWSjdUM?xmt=AQF02RyrlYaKmbsRAWWt6sMKVk4219DbOCEvwHVryT1VdMSaosdqZNBGfk5s944GtCqqEMQ&slof=1

Edited 12 hours ago by guy incognito

[Tigerbomb13]

 

[MichiganCardinal]

I don't think a prosecution could be successful before 2029. Double jeopardy probably wouldn't become an issue. It doesn't attach in a jury trial until the jury is sworn. So that wouldn't be an issue if the feds just said they weren't going to prosecute (which sure seems likely). Even if the state brought charges and were unsuccessful, it wouldn't foreclose a second charge unless it went all the way to a not guilty verdict. And even then, there are rare cases where the feds charge after a state acquittal for effectively the same thing, because it's a different jurisdiction. Think what's going on with Luigi Mangioni, who's charged for the same stuff in both state and federal court.

I have a hard time imagining a successful state prosecution of a federal officer without federal cooperation though. And I don't think trying before 2029 would be wise. The road map I am imagining would seem to be that the state would bring charges, the shooter removes to federal court, and the federal prosecutors (or more likely the appointed folks from DC) commandeer-or at least derail-the prosecution. Passively, they could just refuse access to key ICE witnesses and reports, like they're already doing. More aggressively, they could work to prevent state prosecutors from accessing the federal courthouse on federal land. It would be a guaranteed **** show.

And it's not crazy to think it would result in not a double jeopardy problem, but a res judicata issue (i.e., preventing not a case from being tried twice but a specific legal question being heard twice). If it goes before a federal judge on the immunity issue and gets dismissed because the feds join the defense and say "yep he's immune," That would be hard to re-charge after a judicial finding of immunity. I don't think the state prosecutors should risk that in a case that would already be difficult to prosecute even without federal interference. I've seen much worse police murders result in a not guilty verdict.

That is all to say, I fully anticipate a question asked in Democratic debates will be: "will you authorize the DOJ to prosecute Jonathan Ross?"