Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, oblong said:

Isn’t an NDA just a contract between two parties?  It’s not a legal document. It’s never been tested for government work and I doubt would hold up in a civil court. 

in the context...the person who gets access to classified information signs an NDA to protect the information.   That is also wrapped up in a raft of classification regulation in which you are not allowed to use classification to protect the reputation of the organization.   However, Doofusmctrumpusface won't understand that and will conflate them with the NDAs he made his employees sign to protect...unflattering information. 

Posted
3 hours ago, ewsieg said:

You're thinking like a rational person would think, which is why you are wrong.   It's quite clear looking at her what the real issue is, this aging women thinks it's alright to just represent his whims without truly representing the most important thing to Trump, physical looks.  She has refused Mar-a-lago face and he's not going to tolerate that.

Definitely a legal document, but you can't use it to hide behind illegal acts.  As a public official, no idea if it is even legal to sign an NDA related to your work though.  

What I mean by a legal document is the law can’t come after you.  Poor choice of words. It’s not a criminal act to “break” one. Nobody will arrest you.  If you sign one and I thjnk you break it by only course of action is to sue. I can’t call the cops or city hall. 

Posted
1 hour ago, romad1 said:

in the context...the person who gets access to classified information signs an NDA to protect the information.   That is also wrapped up in a raft of classification regulation in which you are not allowed to use classification to protect the reputation of the organization.   However, Doofusmctrumpusface won't understand that and will conflate them with the NDAs he made his employees sign to protect...unflattering information. 

That’s what I am getting at.  What a government employee signs because of their job and the data they have access to is not th same thing as Trump making his whores sign so they won’t talk about his sick or his employees won’t talk about tbhim young girls visiting mar a Lago. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, oblong said:

That’s what I am getting at.  What a government employee signs because of their job and the data they have access to is not th same thing as Trump making his whores sign so they won’t talk about his sick or his employees won’t talk about tbhim young girls visiting mar a Lago. 

Yeah...I didn't go into why he would think it meant one thing and not the other when i brought it up as a lever on his people who leave.  However, they do probably also have sweetheart deals set up for them so they don't roll.  Or, he's got goons threatening them.  

I think Trump Inc. knows how to intimidate and cajole their risks. 

Posted
2 hours ago, guy incognito said:

🤬

 

IMG_7750.jpeg

IMG_7751.jpeg

IMG_7752.jpeg

IMG_7753.jpeg

This, by the way, highlights the banal evil genius behind the very visible, very public acting out by Trump and his various minions with things they say and antics they engage in: while they are distracting us with that kind of pointless theatrical nonsense, the really terrible destruction of American preeminence, like this, takes place without anyone noticing. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, oblong said:

What I mean by a legal document is the law can’t come after you.  Poor choice of words. It’s not a criminal act to “break” one. Nobody will arrest you.  If you sign one and I thjnk you break it by only course of action is to sue. I can’t call the cops or city hall. 

Right - a corporate NDA can only lead at most to a civil suit. If you are dealing with classified information you are subject to criminal sanctions under various Federal Statutes. FTM even if you never signed anything!

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted

They’re getting ready to use a nuclear weapon. They eliminating any negative voice anywhere, not that they were that many left.
They’re itching to use it.

Posted
30 minutes ago, smr-nj said:

They’re getting ready to use a nuclear weapon. They eliminating any negative voice anywhere, not that they were that many left.
They’re itching to use it.

I hope you’re wrong, Sue.

i fear you’re right.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, smr-nj said:

They’re getting ready to use a nuclear weapon. They eliminating any negative voice anywhere, not that they were that many left. They’re itching to use it.

Trump will grow increasingly frustrated with the war. Allies already humiliated him by refusing to clean up his mess.

Don't forget that "christians" like Hegseth actually WANT to bring about Armageddon so that White Jesus can return.

Nothing would make them happier than incinerating millions of non-believers on Easter Sunday.

Posted (edited)

Maybe the Department of War Crimes will conduct a black flag dirty bomb drone attack on downtown Chicago during the next No Kings march and kill a few thousand paid libtard agitators and the mongrel-blooded children they dragged along, which will allow the regime to declare a national emergency so they can cancel elections everywhere else. Two birds.

Edited by chasfh
Posted

I would like to think that even Trump doesn't want to escalate to nuclear.  My guess is Hegseth got rid of those guys as they were the ones that said not to invade Iran and in current meetings, probably pointing out stupid adult things like 'well, we shouldn't do that sir, that could cause X'.  

I'm not going to pretend I fully understand all ethics regarding military service and how they should operate at that level, regardless if they retire or are let go, but if it is related to acts they believe are War Crime or Nuclear, I do believe its in the Nations best interest that they share their side of the story with the media.

Posted
6 hours ago, guy incognito said:

Night of the Long Knives type ****.
 

IMG_7755.jpeg

Please stop helping to spread twisted and fake narratives being put on on social media by people simply hoping to go viral to earn a few bucks.  A simple search of these people would show that they were not all removed in a single day or that they were even all fired.  

For example, General Allvin retried in August of last year.  There was no firing or announcement he was being replaced.  He simply decided he wanted out for his own reasons.  https://www.airandspaceforces.com/allvin-air-force-chief-of-staff-to-retire/

Unless you're reading a post from the AP or other trusted source, assume it's a lie until you're able to confirm it. 

Posted
1 hour ago, GalagaGuy said:

Please stop helping to spread twisted and fake narratives being put on on social media by people simply hoping to go viral to earn a few bucks.  A simple search of these people would show that they were not all removed in a single day or that they were even all fired.  

For example, General Allvin retried in August of last year.  There was no firing or announcement he was being replaced.  He simply decided he wanted out for his own reasons.  https://www.airandspaceforces.com/allvin-air-force-chief-of-staff-to-retire/

Unless you're reading a post from the AP or other trusted source, assume it's a lie until you're able to confirm it. 

Or Trump or Kegbreath

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...