1984Echoes Posted Wednesday at 10:42 PM Posted Wednesday at 10:42 PM 2 minutes ago, Tenacious D said: I don’t want Clark or McGonigle dealt. I think they were both built for Comerica and are going to be special. Right behind them is Briceno, but apparently there might be some flaws in his game. A clear cut defensive position is certainly one. Anyone else can be had—and our top 10-15 prospects are not fodder. We have depth we can trade from without compromising any sustained future success. This would be my belief as well. Quote
ICroupier Posted Thursday at 02:17 AM Posted Thursday at 02:17 AM I want DeGrom and Bednar. I don't have any confidence come playoff time if we can't land a true #2. Mize has been very good, and I'm fine with him as a #3. But Flaherty has been too inconsistent and far too hittable at times to be trusted. And Olson is too unproven to be counted on in the high pressure playoffs. I'd be willing to trade Liranzo, Hamm, + for DeGrom. And then Lee+ for Bednar. I'd be willing to move others for another bullpen arm if Lange is out again. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Thursday at 03:26 AM Posted Thursday at 03:26 AM 1 hour ago, ICroupier said: Olson is too unproven to be counted on in the high pressure playoffs. Reese at least has already done pretty will under playoff pressure. Two starts last fall - 9 IP, 2ER 8K. ERA 2.00. No decisions. They lost both games after Reese had left the mound. Quote
ICroupier Posted Thursday at 03:46 AM Posted Thursday at 03:46 AM 17 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: They lost both games after Reese had left the mound. And do you trust this year's bullpen to win those games? Because I sure don't. Having our SP keeping us in games is not good enough in the playoffs. We need starters who are going to go out and win those games. And right now, we only have 1 pitcher who can do that. We absolutely need another if we have any chance at a title. 1 Quote
TigerNation Posted Thursday at 04:20 AM Posted Thursday at 04:20 AM 32 minutes ago, ICroupier said: And do you trust this year's bullpen to win those games? Because I sure don't. Having our SP keeping us in games is not good enough in the playoffs. We need starters who are going to go out and win those games. And right now, we only have 1 pitcher who can do that. We absolutely need another if we have any chance at a title. I trust this years offense to win those games. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted Thursday at 01:30 PM Posted Thursday at 01:30 PM 11 hours ago, ICroupier said: I want DeGrom and Bednar. I don't have any confidence come playoff time if we can't land a true #2. Mize has been very good, and I'm fine with him as a #3. But Flaherty has been too inconsistent and far too hittable at times to be trusted. And Olson is too unproven to be counted on in the high pressure playoffs. I'd be willing to trade Liranzo, Hamm, + for DeGrom. And then Lee+ for Bednar. I'd be willing to move others for another bullpen arm if Lange is out again. My favorite part of this post is how you made Lee the highlight of the trade for the best available controllable reliever on the market just hours after Lee disintegrated on the mound. Here’s hoping the Pirates’ front office sees it your way. 🥂 Quote
ICroupier Posted Thursday at 02:14 PM Posted Thursday at 02:14 PM 9 hours ago, TigerNation said: I trust this years offense to win those games. The difference between this year's offense and last year's offense is less than 1 run per game. We didn't lose many games by .5 runs last year, so not sure the offense is going to save the day, either. Quote
ICroupier Posted Thursday at 02:15 PM Posted Thursday at 02:15 PM 39 minutes ago, RatkoVarda said: Hao-Yu Lee Yes, my intent was Hao-yu, not Chase. Quote
chasfh Posted Thursday at 03:17 PM Posted Thursday at 03:17 PM 1 hour ago, RatkoVarda said: Hao-Yu Lee He seems to be the most expendable of the upper-tier prospects, although I'd like to be assured that Bryce Rainer is going to be OK before we offer up Hao-Yu in trade. Quote
Tenacious D Posted Thursday at 03:32 PM Posted Thursday at 03:32 PM 12 minutes ago, chasfh said: He seems to be the most expendable of the upper-tier prospects, although I'd like to be assured that Bryce Rainer is going to be OK before we offer up Hao-Yu in trade. Apples and oranges. Rainer can stick at SS—Lee likely 2B or 3B. I’d lump Lee with Jung, Keith. Maybe McGonigle, too, if they ultimately decide he’s not a SS. Quote
1984Echoes Posted Thursday at 05:30 PM Posted Thursday at 05:30 PM 1 hour ago, Tenacious D said: ... I’d lump Lee with Jung, Keith... McGonigle, And Max Anderson. Quote
Tiger337 Posted Thursday at 06:22 PM Posted Thursday at 06:22 PM 4 hours ago, RatkoVarda said: Hao-Yu Lee I'm fine. 5 Quote
CaliforniaDreaming Posted Thursday at 09:05 PM Posted Thursday at 09:05 PM 2 hours ago, Tiger337 said: I'm fine. Watch it, that kind of joke could get you fired. Sincerely, Jack Morris Quote
Tiger337 Posted Thursday at 09:13 PM Posted Thursday at 09:13 PM 2 minutes ago, CaliforniaDreaming said: Watch it, that kind of joke could get you fired. Sincerely, Jack Morris I don't know. That's how his name is pronounced. It's not like I am using an Asian stereotype or slur. Quote
Shinzaki Posted Thursday at 09:40 PM Posted Thursday at 09:40 PM It's not like you called him Little Lord F**k Pants. It's going to take more than 2B prospect Lee to get Bednar. Maybe Max Anderson and Hamm Quote
Tiger337 Posted Thursday at 09:42 PM Posted Thursday at 09:42 PM 1 minute ago, Shinzaki said: It's not like you called him Little Lord F**k Pants. No politics here Quote
ICroupier Posted Thursday at 10:25 PM Posted Thursday at 10:25 PM 40 minutes ago, Shinzaki said: It's not like you called him Little Lord F**k Pants. It's going to take more than 2B prospect Lee to get Bednar. Maybe Max Anderson and Hamm That's why I said Lee+. I'm not opposed to trading Hamm, per se, but not in a 2-for-1 for a RP. Lee is ranked higher than Hamm, but I'd be more willing to trade a highly ranked MI vs. a SP. Maybe Lee-Montalvo gets it done? Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted Thursday at 10:37 PM Posted Thursday at 10:37 PM I can’t believe anyone takes that skenes offer idea seriously. Talk about setting our franchise back another 15 years….. Quote
RatkoVarda Posted yesterday at 12:20 AM Author Posted yesterday at 12:20 AM 1 hour ago, monkeytargets39 said: I can’t believe anyone takes that skenes offer idea seriously. Talk about setting our franchise back another 15 years….. there's a universe where the Tigers get Skenes, make the playoffs the next 5 years, winning 4 pennants and 3 World Series. Quote
TigerNation Posted yesterday at 01:15 AM Posted yesterday at 01:15 AM 10 hours ago, ICroupier said: The difference between this year's offense and last year's offense is less than 1 run per game. We didn't lose many games by .5 runs last year, so not sure the offense is going to save the day, either. Do you think any pitching additions will result in our pitching staff giving up one full run a game less over the course of a season? Quote
ICroupier Posted yesterday at 02:42 AM Posted yesterday at 02:42 AM 1 hour ago, TigerNation said: Do you think any pitching additions will result in our pitching staff giving up one full run a game less over the course of a season? Why would we measure a single pitcher's impact on the full team's runs allowed per game, and why would we measure it over the course of the season? This makes zero sense and has absolutely no bearing on the topic. We're talking about a pitcher who can be a difference maker in Game 2 of a playoff series and win us the game vs. keep us in a game. That's the only question that matters. And the answer to that question is yes. DeGrom. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted yesterday at 02:46 AM Posted yesterday at 02:46 AM 1 minute ago, ICroupier said: Why would we measure a single pitcher's impact on the full team's runs allowed per game, and why would we measure it over the course of the season? This makes zero sense and has absolutely no bearing on the topic. We're talking about a pitcher who can be a difference maker in Game 2 of a playoff series and win us the game vs. keep us in a game. That's the only question that matters. And the answer to that question is yes. DeGrom. All pitchers today are ticking time bombs, DeGrom takes it to another level. He may help a team win a WS, he may blow out his arm for the 4th and final time tomorrow. Quote
Tiger337 Posted yesterday at 03:26 AM Posted yesterday at 03:26 AM 3 hours ago, RatkoVarda said: there's a universe where the Tigers get Skenes, make the playoffs the next 5 years, winning 4 pennants and 3 World Series. Yes, there is. That's why I don't think the proposal is completely nuts. It's not the direction I want them to go in though. I like that they finally have a young successful team and a system which seems primed to pump talent into the majors for years to come. I've been waiting for this since the 80s. I don't want to see them give that up for one great pitcher who could have a career altering injury at any time. Quote
buddha Posted yesterday at 03:48 AM Posted yesterday at 03:48 AM 3 hours ago, RatkoVarda said: there's a universe where the Tigers get Skenes, make the playoffs the next 5 years, winning 4 pennants and 3 World Series. there's also a universe where we have two hall of fame starters in their prime and get swept by the giants. 😞 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.