Stanley70 Posted yesterday at 03:17 PM Posted yesterday at 03:17 PM Is he better than Kayode Awosika? Quote
Motown Bombers Posted yesterday at 03:29 PM Posted yesterday at 03:29 PM He was better than Mahogany last year but he only played 200 snaps. Quote
Jason_R Posted yesterday at 03:34 PM Posted yesterday at 03:34 PM And Borom was as good as Decker was last year. It would not be ideal if he ends up the starter, but with an upgrade at center and the depth they have added, the OL will be much improved even if Borom starts. Which he won’t, because they will draft their new tackle for the next ten years in the first round, and the tackle depth is deep enough that they might be able to move back from 17 to do it. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted yesterday at 03:40 PM Posted yesterday at 03:40 PM With the all the consternation about free agents, I like what they have done with the line. They got a starting center without breaking their future cap, they got a solid back up center, a solid OT3, and now a good guard who is starting caliber who can legitimately push Mahogany for starting LG. Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted yesterday at 03:47 PM Author Posted yesterday at 03:47 PM My problem with Borom isn't that he necessarily stinks or anything. He may well not. As a swing tackle, I think he could be a very solid signing. As a starter, I'm not as certain about that. In his 5 year career he has never once been a regular starter. The most games he has ever started was 11 last year with Miami and prior to that was 9 with Chicago. He's been a backup his entire career that has come in when needed due to injuries. Some of him being a backup may be due to his own injuries as he has been on IR twice during his career. He's not been top of the depth chart. Maybe they found a diamond in the rough and in his 6th year in the league he will finally become a full time starter. Maybe Chicago and Miami were just such poorly run and coached teams in the past that they didn't know what they had in Borom and now we do. If we draft a tackle early on in the draft, first round preferably, I think Borom could be a very nice reserve addition. If we are expecting Borom to go out there and be a full time, 17 game starter, he's never shown he can do that. That makes me nervous and it is the vibe I got from Brad's quote. We shall see. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted yesterday at 04:37 PM Posted yesterday at 04:37 PM Borom was pretty good in the 11 games he started last year. Better than Decker. I have no earthly idea why you think Holmes should say he needs a starting LT before the draft. Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted 23 hours ago Author Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Motown Bombers said: Borom was pretty good in the 11 games he started last year. Better than Decker. I have no earthly idea why you think Holmes should say he needs a starting LT before the draft. So does he need to allude to Borom being the starter then? If so, are you suggesting that other NFL teams believe that he will be the starter and that him signing and Brad saying what he's said is enough to dissuade other NFL front offices from thinking the Lions will draft a tackle in the first? Quote
Jason_R Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Brad Holmes needs to take out an ad in the Detroit Free Press, right next to a Carlos Monarrez article, saying, “Larry Borom is our starting left tackle. We will not be drafting a tackle at pick 17. Also, we will soon publish our full draft board alongside a compilation of the best work from Rob Parker.” 1 Quote
buddha Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago if the lions published 1/10th of their draft board, it would dwarf the size of the best work of carlos monarrez and rob parker combined. Quote
romad1 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, buddha said: if the lions published 1/10th of their draft board, it would dwarf the size of the best work of carlos monarrez and rob parker combined. Lazy sportswriters or dumb sportswriters? Which are worse? Quote
Jason_R Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago They appeal to a certain type of fan. Brad has always done a good job of adjusting the roster going into the draft to minimize any glaring needs. He has done that this time also. He isn’t forced to take a tackle at 17. And no, he doesn’t owe it to fans or to interviewers to give a full or final account of his draft or roster plans. He is even entitled to lie or use smokescreens if it suits him. He can, will, and should do and say anything he thinks will improve his competitive situation. I still think they will take an OT in the first round, and I hope they will have the opportunity to trade back in the first round to do so. Quote
MichiganCardinal Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Monarrez is neither dumb nor lazy. He’s just scum, and the worst of what sports writing has become. His content generates clicks, clicks generate revenue, he keeps his job and probably gets a nice yearly raise. Given a truth serum he would admit that he doesn’t even believe half the nonsense he spews. But “”it’s provocative. It gets the people going.” -Chazz Michael Michaels” - Kanye West 1 Quote
buddha Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago every town has a writer like that. it used to be drew sharpe forever. then rahb pawker. now monarrez. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Rob Parker was the first person to ever block me on Twitter. 1 Quote
Shinzaki Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Wayne Fontes once discussed his draft day priorities...as a result, all of those guys were off the board when we picked. Brad doesn't draft for need sp much ad he drafts for talent. I think he takes McNeil-Warren, the big safety out of Toledo Quote
1984Echoes Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago I think Mauigoa, Freeling and Faulk are his 1st round wants/ top of their "Board" based on both: High-end talent... And "Lions Personality" or "type-of-player". The 2nd part is as important as the 1st part to both Holmes and DC. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.