Jump to content

Where Do Things End With Vlad? (h/t romad1)


chasfh

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said:

Given the control his has over his domestic media, he can take whatever offer the West has already put on the table, declare it a great victory and go home none the worse for wear.

We can only hope.

Nobody wants war.

Well... Putin did. Uncertain if he still wants it or if he'll take the offer that the U.S. is giving him (after pushing for as much as he can get with his saber rattling...).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Maybe Putin is believing his own press that says Biden is weak and is making America a laughingstock. If so, catching him flat-footed on that is working for us here.

I just don't think he expected as much of a unified approach as he has gotten not only internally here in the states, but with NATO states at large.

On the former point, as much intransigence exists and as much as guys like Tucker talk about how we need to leave Russia alone, the reality is that the majority of GOP politicians seem to be either relatively behind the President's approach in terms of moving troops to Eastern Europe or advocate for being more aggressive (ie.things like Sanctions pre-invasion). In other words, I think he expected a lot more division in the US than has manifested itself.

On the latter point, NATO countries seem relatively attuned to their aggression, particularly more than they were a week and a half ago. Countries are sending supplies and aid to Ukraine. And even Germany, which has been relatively beholden to Russia because of North Stream 2, seems to be signaling that an invasion would follow with sanctions.

Putin expected a divided west and ultimately he bet wrong. I dont know if he will invade or not, but I suspect that the goal from a diplomatic POV is to come up with an off-ramp so he can save face / declare a victory.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

I just don't think he expected as much of a unified approach as he has gotten not only internally here in the states, but with NATO states at large.

On the former point, as much intransigence exists and as much as guys like Tucker talk about how we need to leave Russia alone, the reality is that the majority of GOP politicians seem to be either relatively behind the President's approach in terms of moving troops to Eastern Europe or advocate for being more aggressive (ie.things like Sanctions pre-invasion). In other words, I think he expected a lot more division in the US than has manifested itself.

On the latter point, NATO countries seem relatively attuned to their aggression, particularly more than they were a week and a half ago. Countries are sending supplies and aid to Ukraine. And even Germany, which has been relatively beholden to Russia because of North Stream 2, seems to be signaling that an invasion would follow with sanctions.

Putin expected a divided west and ultimately he bet wrong. I dont know if he will invade or not, but I suspect that the goal from a diplomatic POV is to come up with an off-ramp so he can save face / declare a victory.

I hope this is true.  Putin isn't beyond making mistakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, was just thinking about the political psychology of Biden in this European crisis.

Lifelong sufferer of his stutter.  May have been bullied. Genial.  Loves being the "good guy" and seems to be a huge fan of collective security.  

Might be the ideal person to respond to Putin. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, romad1 said:

So, was just thinking about the political psychology of Biden in this European crisis.

Lifelong sufferer of his stutter.  May have been bullied. Genial.  Loves being the "good guy" and seems to be a huge fan of collective security.  

Might be the ideal person to respond to Putin. 

 

I think Hillary would have responded in similar fashion, with the same or even better cooperation from allies. Given her tenure at State, this kind of situation seems right up her alley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I think Hillary would have responded in similar fashion, with the same or even better cooperation from allies. Given her tenure at State, this kind of situation seems right up her alley.

Not to disagree but,  I disagree. 

I think we can let that go as to why.  I have a couple of templates for her behavior that I might be retaining from my days when i viewed her has a political adversary and I'll leave it there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, romad1 said:

Not to disagree but,  I disagree. 

I think we can let that go as to why.  I have a couple of templates for her behavior that I might be retaining from my days when i viewed her has a political adversary and I'll leave it there.   

Not to seem dismissive of your authority on the subject, but I had seen in multiple sources that Putin did not want Hillary to be President specifically because she was such a tough-minded adversary at State, and that she had the ear of all the major European allies. I believe one of the places I’d seen that was in one of the first books released early during the Trump admin. Not true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chasfh said:

Not to seem dismissive of your authority on the subject, but I had seen in multiple sources that Putin did not want Hillary to be President specifically because she was such a tough-minded adversary at State, and that she had the ear of all the major European allies. I believe one of the places I’d seen that was in one of the first books released early during the Trump admin. Not true?

No, no...I'm not claiming authority. 

Tough-minded is fine.  She has many other characteristics that do not breed success in collective security.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, romad1 said:

No, no...I'm not claiming authority. 

Tough-minded is fine.  She has many other characteristics that do not breed success in collective security.   

I just meant you’re the guy with more inside dope than all the rest of us combined, is all. You know actual stuff.

As President of the United States, if you can’t win them over by force of personality, win them over by force.I would think in a situation like this she could rely on the former more than the latter. There’s no way to know for sure, of course, but I’m thinking her success level right now would have been at least the equal of Biden’s.

Can you imagine having the other guy in the White House at this moment? Holy shit, the mind boggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I just meant you’re the guy with more inside dope than all the rest of us combined, is all. You know actual stuff.

As President of the United States, if you can’t win them over by force of personality, win them over by force.I would think in a situation like this she could rely on the former more than the latter. There’s no way to know for sure, of course, but I’m thinking her success level right now would have been at least the equal of Biden’s.

Can you imagine having the other guy in the White House at this moment? Holy shit, the mind boggles.

For sure.  It already has boggled.   Vindeman et. al.,  but it would be beyond scary to see him in this knowing he has to do exactly what Putin wants. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Have the russophile right wing media like Fox and their fellow travelers alarmed their viewers with visions of nuclear retaliation if we don't give Putin what he wants?

I think they are arguing that Putin is the only "Christian" leader and therefore we should support him. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, romad1 said:

I think they are arguing that Putin is the only "Christian" leader and therefore we should support him. 

true, he represents himself as the defender of the eldest of all churches. Then again, as I've gotten older my opinion has tended toward the belief that the only thing historicity does for churches is embed their corruption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

true, he represents himself as the defender of the eldest of all churches. Then again, as I've gotten older my opinion has tended toward the belief that the only thing historicity does for churches is embed their corruption.

Religion is the last refuge of the scoundrel of course. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem for guy like Putin is that being without constraints he is free to revel in all his prejudices, and soon enough he forgets they're only his prejudices and starts to see them as truth - so it's self re-enforcing. That helps give him the great self-confidence that every good tyrant needs, but also puts him on the wrong side of right nearly all of the time.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

The problem for guy like Putin is that being without constraints he is free to revel in all his prejudices, and soon enough he forgets they only his prejudices and starts to see them as truth - so it's self re-enforcing. That helps give him the great self-confidence that every good tyrant needs, but also puts him on the wrong side of right nearly all of the time.

I think its not without evidence that he has been "telling himself a story" about all this.  Which conforms to the above. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...