casimir

Ha, I just looked at the tweet above which has Dillingham and Sheppard going 3 and 4. I was looking at another mock that had them something like 6 and 8 which is where I thought about those two. I suppose there’s going to be pretty good variance on who goes where this draft. I know the Pistons need a lot, but it seems like outside shooting would unravel a lot of knots in the offense. Maybe it’s not good to focus on a singular attribute like that, but it ain’t like this draft is chock full of highly diversely skilled players.

26.1% from 3? Pass. Get some outside shooting to help out Cunningham. Would Dillingham or Sheppard be better fits?

This may not be the appropriate forum for you. You may need to seek professional help elsewhere. <Looks around to see who is online.> Nope, we cannot help you here.

So, given Torkelson's week, albeit maybe BABIP aided, do they move him up the lineup a bit?

The lottery is what it is. This franchise isn't an abhorrent mess because of ping pong balls or frozen envelopes or tin foil hats. This franchise is a complete dumpster fire because its front office is only two qualified clowns short of a circus.

Sorry, I forgot to use the 'sarcasimir" log in for that post.

Clutch stuff there.

He’s had a pretty good week. Hopefully he’s figured something out and we’re seeing this going forward. They need to lengthen the lineup out as much as possible. A rejuvenated Torkelson and a maturing Keith would really help out.

Way to turn the Piston frown upside down.

That was fun.

So, ok, here’s the rainbow around this pile of lottery crap. The Pistons won’t improve enough to stay out of the lottery next year, and welcome to Detroit Cooper Flagg.

Unless shenanigans occur before the end of this game, 20-20 after 40. Improvements over previous seasons, sure. But the offensive struggles just stick out bigly.

No worries. I’m sure Weaver and Drunk Uncle Tommy will have everything under control this off-season.

Other than that….

Hold on, Verlander has top seniority among active MLB players? I hadn’t thought of that, but I guess it makes sense. Damn I’m old.

The rose goes in the front, big guy.

That’s different. 🤣

There’s still time.

Oh, I’m not saying NIL is the best and cleanest business model. But Urbz suddenly reaches for morals? Come on…..

Is “go to guy” code for “research donkey”?

Nobody went with Canha Slamha? I’m a little disappointed.

Cincinnati at San Francisco. Gonna be a short night for him traveling back for tomorrow’s Tiger game. Old friend Buck Farmer is on the bump right now. Old friend Candelario at 1B. Oh, the memories….

OK, OK, I got Monday's games.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/urban-meyer-believes-nil-in-college-football-has-evolved-into-cheating-thats-not-what-the-intent-is/ That's cheating? OK, Urbz.....

Per bbref: 1-1: 58 matching player(s). 54 played in the majors (93%). Total of 1149.1 WAR, or 21.3 per major leaguer. (Danny Goodwin drafted 1-1 twice). 1-2: 59 matching player(s). 52 played in the majors (88%). Total of 762.6 WAR, or 14.7 per major leaguer. 1-3: 59 matching player(s). 48 played in the majors (81%). Total of 652.7 WAR, or 13.6 per major leaguer. 1-4: 59 matching player(s). 48 played in the majors (81%). Total of 603.9 WAR, or 12.6 per major leaguer. 1-5: 59 matching player(s). 40 played in the majors (67%). Total of 444.1 WAR, or 11.1 per major leaguer. 1-6: 59 matching player(s). 45 played in the majors (76%). Total of 618.2 WAR, or 13.7 per major leaguer. 1-7: 59 matching player(s). 43 played in the majors (72%). Total of 460.9 WAR, or 10.7 per major leaguer. 1-8: 58 matching player(s). 38 played in the majors (65%). Total of 319.2 WAR, or 8.4 per major leaguer. (Wade Townsend drafted 1-8 twice). 1-9: 59 matching player(s). 38 played in the majors (64%). Total of 316.6 WAR, or 8.3 per major leaguer. 1-10: 59 matching player(s). 48 played in the majors (81%). Total of 500.8 WAR, or 10.4 per major leaguer.