1776

I was predicting he’d withdraw before Monday. I’m moving the timeline to before Saturday. It’s a foregone conclusion. The longer he waits the more the confusion and chaos in the party. The script is being written now.

Did Crooks have money invested in this outfit? As in, did he have skin in the game, no matter the amount?

It’s a non starter. I still hear people today refer to President Clinton and President Reagan.

Hillary says she’s not busy the next four years.

Maybe they don’t want to upset the powers that be that dish out funding for election campaigns for fear of being on the wrong side of the argument. Maybe they’re waiting to see which way the tide is going. I think we’ll know something within days right now. When Schumer and Schiff both come out against Biden staying in, it’s bigger news than his campaign.

This has nothing to do with democracy. Where would the left be without the constant harping on everything being a threat to democracy! This is an inner party issue that will get worked out, possibly to some folks angst.

What is Biden’s impact on the down ticket? Haven’t there already been instances of candidates shying away from having him along for public appearances? Frankly, I don’t understand why Jill Biden doesn’t try to convince her husband to take the wins, go home, and enjoy a retirement with family and friends. The man has been in Washington 55 years! When is it enough? I say this regarding all lifers in Washington, regardless of party.

So is it possible that this is the first small, but possibly orchestrated, step in removing Biden from the ticket? He was booked to do a speech in Nevada tonight if I’m not mistaken. As per script, Biden will have ongoing issues with this health concern. The powers step in and act. Biden gracefully steps aside and that’s that. Reasoning behind this is that Biden can’t fulfill his schedule as necessary in the most critical time of this race. I personally wish him a quick and full recovery. I’m just a bit cynical in my politics these days.

My impression of your comment leads me to believe you’ve not attended a AAA game the last two years. To limit the challenges currently in AAA, the PCL is allowed three challenges and the IL is permitted two challenges. Charging a pitcher with a balk is not part of the conversation. I’m an old timer by most definitions and I am 100% for some rendition of an ABS/Challenge System.

On an unrelated note, Manfred says that MLB is considering experimenting with some rendition of the ABS in the majors next year.

Over my first cup of coffee this morning I want to say I think you’re on to something here, seriously. I agree with your point. One area that jumps out at me here is that the league apparently doesn’t really have, or should I say enforce, any uniform guidelines. It appears as though the individual wearing the uniform can wear it however he sees fit. I believe a lot of this is driven with the intent to let Latin American players express themselves in a way US born players may not have done in the past. But, the word “uniform” does still have a definition. As these individuals wear neckwear that used to receive warnings from officials on the field, now nothing is said. Chains, necklaces were not permitted to hang loosely out of the uniforms for safety reasons. I recall times in the past when the home plate umpire would stop play and make a pitcher tuck a necklace back into his shirt because of the distraction it could be to the batter. Players leave buttons undone at the top of the uniforms to the point that you sometimes can’t make out the team name on the jersey. Cleats and sock colors are another area that players get creative, often in contrast to the uniform they wear. I see it as a “come as you are” invitation to the MLB game. I know the league (there really is only one league now) wants to promote its international appeal. I think every minor league team now has a uniform that celebrates the Latin American heritage. I get all that. Several years ago MLB introduced the mantra, Let’em Play. This is where a lot of the old norms were openly challenged and have, over several years, been discarded. This is where the bat flip became a part of the game. There are other examples of what I’m getting at but I’ll stop here. I still love the game! As REO Speedwagon sang, Roll with the changes.

You really can’t make this stuff up.. Embattled Secret Service director Kimberly Cheatle has a bizarre explanation for the agency’s failure to secure the rooftop used by the shooter who attempted to assassinate former president Donald Trump over the weekend. “That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there’s a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,” Cheatle told ABC News in an exchange that was not included in the outlet’s write-up of the interview nor the published transcript.

Mr. Market was in a good mood today.

Apparently Hinch didn’t say the magic words. I’d like to hear Bochy’s attempt at logic.

Thank you. I didn’t make the connection.

Ol’ Tim got suckered big time. Just another brick in the wall.

Literally? I must have missed the news about an attempted hanging. Details?

We are entirely in mutual funds these days and have been for some time. However, I do see individual stocks as tempting. About a year ago I considered selling one of the funds and buying five individual stocks. They were all at good buy points. M* had them at 5 star stocks, which is to say they were well below fair value. I did all the homework on each stock I decided to go with. They were: Pfizer (still in buy territory), Truist, Duke Energy, Realty Income, and Gilead Science. All these stocks pay a good dividend and at the same time offered a good upside on price appreciation. I never sold the fund for the sake of buying my mini portfolio. Pfizer is the only one that hasn’t moved up much since my decision. I still look at that as a good long term buy. Their top scientist left the company last week so that does give me some pause. Buying and trading individual stocks require a bit of effort that I don’t have to commit to with a boring mutual fund.

Kamala lacks substance.

FYI, I had so hoped Haley would be the nominee at the outset.

I don’t see that angle getting any traction. Trump already appeals to the blue collar guy/gal. He’s their hero against the establishment. The establishment is anything Washington. Biden represents over 50 years old political waste land in D.C. Vance isn’t going to hurt or change that perception among Trump’s base. Vance will be a boost to Trump’s chances over what a Mike Pence type could offer. Biden has his own issues within his own party right now and that isn’t going away. I don’t like either candidate. Should be interesting from here on out.

I won’t argue that. I’ve heard Vance’s name on and off for several years but never cared enough to look him up. I just looked up his bio. Interesting beyond politics.

I don’t follow the Trump train as closely as this board does. I try to avoid the rhetoric and division. I had pretty much decided to write in Youngkin’s name for the presidency in November. His not getting the VP nod 🙏 is a good thing. I was hoping he would stay as far away from Trump as possible. I would like to think he would be a choice in 2028.

A seat cushion would qualify as articulate beside Kamala Harris.

I’ve been very impressed at how Kamala was able to navigate such a difficult assignment. 😉