Jump to content

2023 NCAA Football Thread


Deleterious

Recommended Posts

What can't go on usually doesn't. This looks to me like the end of NIL - at least as the main show.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5510354/2024/05/23/house-v-ncaa-settlement-votes/

The revenue sharing would be an optional model for power-conference programs, potentially as soon as next year, in which 22 percent of those schools’ average annual revenue — or roughly $20 million a year — would be distributable directly to athletes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

What can't go on usually doesn't. This looks to me like the end of NIL - at least as the main show.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5510354/2024/05/23/house-v-ncaa-settlement-votes/

The revenue sharing would be an optional model for power-conference programs, potentially as soon as next year, in which 22 percent of those schools’ average annual revenue — or roughly $20 million a year — would be distributable directly to athletes.

the system still has no rules and no teeth to it.  this is all a prelude to the scenario we've all been talking about for years: unionization and collective bargaining.  until then its still the wild west.

do you think ole miss, lsu, and ohio state boosters are suddenly going to stop paying players extra cash because theyre now "officially" getting paid?  come on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, buddha said:

the system still has no rules and no teeth to it.  this is all a prelude to the scenario we've all been talking about for years: unionization and collective bargaining.  until then its still the wild west.

do you think ole miss, lsu, and ohio state boosters are suddenly going to stop paying players extra cash because theyre now "officially" getting paid?  come on.

To that point, are we naive enough to think that NIL has caused all moneys to be above table now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, buddha said:

the system still has no rules and no teeth to it.  this is all a prelude to the scenario we've all been talking about for years: unionization and collective bargaining.  until then its still the wild west.

do you think ole miss, lsu, and ohio state boosters are suddenly going to stop paying players extra cash because theyre now "officially" getting paid?  come on.

no they won't, but when the base rate in your conference is 20mil, the money you raise on the outside will have much less relative leverage. Put it this way - before NIL, if the base was just a student's stipend, then the booster money of a few $M could dwarf that.  Then NIL made it worse as some schools raised 7 figures and some almost nothing.

With the 22% diversion fund, If UM starts at $20M+, even if OSU's boosters kick in $5M more than UM's do so you end up with say $30M vs $35M, that difference is a much smaller % difference in total cash available than the old system with clean(er) teams and dirt(ier) teams.  which is why I phrased it as the outside money no longer being the main show.

 

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

another shoe drops - all transfer limitations and restrictions dropped.  I can't imagine what people are thinking the future they are creating is going to look like, other than chaos.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5530608/2024/05/30/ncaa-transfer-rules-banned-permanently/

Quote

A consent decree announced Thursday makes that policy change permanent, allowing athletes to transfer an unlimited number of times without penalty. It also requires the NCAA to restore a year of eligibility for current athletes who missed a year of competition since 2019-20 due to the old policy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

another shoe drops - all transfer limitations and restrictions dropped.  I can't imagine what people are thinking the future they are creating is going to look like, other than chaos.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5530608/2024/05/30/ncaa-transfer-rules-banned-permanently/

 

it will look like professional sports free agency, which is what it is.

there are no restrictions for college students to transfer betwen schools, so there are no restrictions for college athletes to do so either.

until they unionize, sign a cba, and then sign a contract.  which is what is coming next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, buddha said:

it will look like professional sports free agency, which is what it is.

right - with the twist that every player is on an expiring one-yr deal. 😱

Next season are we going to  see the first highly ranked player start the season playing for one team and finish the same season playing for another? Say maybe a guy decides to bolt because he his team loses  a couple and fall out of playoff contention?   🤯

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, buddha said:

it will look like professional sports free agency, which is what it is.

there are no restrictions for college students to transfer betwen schools, so there are no restrictions for college athletes to do so either.

until they unionize, sign a cba, and then sign a contract.  which is what is coming next.

Any athletes that are still in college and had to sit out a year in the past for a transfer will get an extra year of eligibility.  

This means that Utah QB Cam Rising could in theory stay for an 8th year in college next year.  

Edited by Hongbit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...