Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I will say this:

every time I think this man can’t get more despicable …. he does. There evidently isn’t a low point that he can’t achieve.

I suppose that’s notable.

I just can’t believe that people who are currently in the military are looking at this man and not feeling like there’s something that they need to do.
 

Posted
15 hours ago, guy incognito said:

 

IMG_3422.jpeg

Reading the full transcript I think it was supposed to be "not" spread democracy at the point of a gun. The next sentence talks about what it is to do. 

It's an unfortunate error and one that would have been corrected in the public record in the past if the president wasn't already violating the emoluments clause, sending people to foreign prisons for civil infractions without due process, violating the Impoundment Act and Article I daily, ...

Posted
8 minutes ago, HighOPS said:

Reading the full transcript I think it was supposed to be "not" spread democracy at the point of a gun. The next sentence talks about what it is to do. 

It's an unfortunate error and one that would have been corrected in the public record in the past if the president wasn't already violating the emoluments clause, sending people to foreign prisons for civil infractions without due process, violating the Impoundment Act and Article I daily, ...

That's what I heard too.  

Posted
On 5/24/2025 at 5:28 PM, smr-nj said:

I will say this:

every time I think this man can’t get more despicable …. he does. There evidently isn’t a low point that he can’t achieve.

I suppose that’s notable.

I just can’t believe that people who are currently in the military are looking at this man and not feeling like there’s something that they need to do.
 

Military people are not generally the biggest supporters of the idea of democracy. 

Posted
2 hours ago, chasfh said:

Military people are not generally the biggest supporters of the idea of democracy. 

They swore oaths to the Constitution.  

 

I would have said “They swore oaths ….….Dickhead” if i weren’t so open minded and magnanimous.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, romad1 said:

They swore oaths to the Constitution.  

 

I would have said “They swore oaths ….….Dickhead” if i weren’t so open minded and magnanimous.  

I’m not trying to be a dickhead, and I certainly don’t mean 100% of all military people, which, I could see why you’d take that from what I posted. But as you know as well as anyone, not everyone who swears an oath to the Constitution embraces all its principles. After all, this president and his personal party’s elected representatives all swore oaths to the Constitution. How seriously do you think they are taking that oath?

The military itself is anything but a democracy. Nobody is asking grunts for their votes on how the military should be run, and that’s the way it should be, because of the unique role the military fulfills. But that certainly must also be a big draw for a high percentage of the leadership who would like to impose the military’s brand of dictatorial command-and-control on the civilian population as well. Michael Flynn is a pretty good example of that. That’s what I meant to imply by what I said.

Edited by chasfh
Posted
42 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I’m not trying to be a dickhead, and I certainly don’t mean 100% of all military people, which, I could see why you’d take that from what I posted. But as you know as well as anyone, not everyone who swears an oath to the Constitution embraces all its principles. After all, this president and his personal party’s elected representatives all swore oaths to the Constitution. How seriously do you think they are taking that oath?

The military itself is anything but a democracy. Nobody is asking grunts for their votes on how the military should be run, and that’s the way it should be, because of the unique role the military fulfills. But that certainly must also be a big draw for a high percentage of the leadership who would like to impose the military’s brand of dictatorial command-and-control on the civilian population as well. Michael Flynn is a pretty good example of that. That’s what I meant to imply by what I said.

Huge distance between the grifters who command them and the people who serve. 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, guy incognito said:

It’s Festivus again.

IMG_3447.jpeg

I suppose we should be grateful that he didn't 'honor' people like my Uncle Bill, who gave their lives for their country, by calling them suckers and losers again. 

  • Thanks 3
Posted
2 hours ago, romad1 said:

Huge distance between the grifters who command them and the people who serve. 

It’s the grifters who command them that I think we should be concerned about.

Posted
8 hours ago, romad1 said:

Huge distance between the grifters who command them and the people who serve. 

In the US military I would guess more people learn to lead by actually leading than by just issuing orders than most any other place, which certainly doesn't preclude there being a share of little Napoleons there. But those little Napoleon's are just as drawn to the business world and maybe even more to domestic hierarchies like policing. They are a ubiquitous social hazard.

Posted
6 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

In the US military I would guess more people learn to lead by actually leading than by just issuing orders than most any other place, which certainly doesn't preclude there being a share of little Napoleons there. But those little Napoleon's are just as drawn to the business world and maybe even more to domestic hierarchies like policing. They are a ubiquitous social hazard.

the amount of stress that people are under in conflict drives a requirement to weed out the venal and the weak.   It doesn't necessarily weed out the egomaniacs.   

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/25/2025 at 8:36 AM, HighOPS said:

Reading the full transcript I think it was supposed to be "not" spread democracy at the point of a gun. The next sentence talks about what it is to do. 

That's a "defeated Medicare" level ****up. 

I'm sure Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson are on it lol

Posted (edited)

Trump Pardoned Tax Cheat After Mother Attended $1 Million Dinner - The New York Times

We got him dead to rights!  File this with the other things we have him dead to rights on. 

Quote

Trump Pardoned Tax Cheat After Mother Attended $1 Million Dinner

Paul Walczak’s pardon application cited his mother’s support for the president, including raising millions of dollars and a connection to a plot to publicize a Biden family diary.

 

Edited by romad1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...