Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, romad1 said:

MAGA Mike has got to be in the files.  

I'm guessing somebody has something else on him, to be revealed if he goes against the Program.

Posted
14 hours ago, romad1 said:

MAGA Mike has got to be in the files.  

Johnson was a second term nothing Congressman when Epstein was brought down. I doubt he was somebody who had anything close to the power to wield to get into Epstein's circle.

Posted
2 hours ago, Edman85 said:

Johnson was a second term nothing Congressman when Epstein was brought down. I doubt he was somebody who had anything close to the power to wield to get into Epstein's circle.

I gather there is some connection to Peter Thiel who is really big on how he is definitely not the anti-Christ and that he's an expert on that and that AI must be given all of our records or the anti-Christ wins.  

Posted

I mean, come on, is this seriously the **** Bunker and Trumpaholic voted for? Using the machinery of government to alter foreign and economic policy just because the guy is butthurt over a ****ing ad that means jack**** to the security of this country? How exactly the **** is this making America great?

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I mean, come on, is this seriously the **** Bunker and Trumpaholic voted for? Using the machinery of government to alter foreign and economic policy just because the guy is butthurt over a ****ing ad that means jack**** to the security of this country? How exactly the **** is this making America great?

 

Canadians are mean so I'm going to make Americans pay more for their stuff!

Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I mean, come on, is this seriously the **** Bunker and Trumpaholic voted for? Using the machinery of government to alter foreign and economic policy just because the guy is butthurt over a ****ing ad that means jack**** to the security of this country? How exactly the **** is this making America great?

 

image.png.9e00c905d6e7bc38d88050a62ced7fd8.png

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Maga end game is white supremacy, monarchy, slavery with AI robots in case humans misbehave. Musk throwing a Nazi salute is nothing compared to some of these billionaires. 

Posted
14 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

image.png.9e00c905d6e7bc38d88050a62ced7fd8.png

What makes this reply low-key brilliant is everyone knows you’re talking about Trump but Trumpaholic thinks you’re talking about me.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Tigermojo said:

Maga end game is white supremacy, monarchy, slavery with AI robots in case humans misbehave. Musk throwing a Nazi salute is nothing compared to some of these billionaires. 

Democrats support a candidate that has a Nazi symbol tattoo on his chest and a terrorist supporting muslim for mayor of NYC.  When you post stupid things like this you can't even be taken seriously.  The only thing this political section if good for is getting a laugh and making fun of kids posting the same thing over and over again

Posted
6 minutes ago, Archie said:

Democrats support a candidate that has a Nazi symbol tattoo on his chest and a terrorist supporting muslim for mayor of NYC.  When you post stupid things like this you can't even be taken seriously.  The only thing this political section if good for is getting a laugh and making fun of kids posting the same thing over and over again

Curtis Yarvin put all of his views online and he was invited to Trump's inauguration. It's too dark to read with your head up Trump's diaper.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, CMRivdogs said:

Even if it were in session we do not and would not have a functional Democracy under the Orange TACO

image.thumb.png.74fadfb4a68a1c853676379caa57e542.png

So as much as I despise Trump, I also hate it when people post nonsense that just isn't true and then repost it without taking a second to verify it.   The facts are that the President does have authority to impose tariffs under a variety of scenarios and that Congress has granted them the power to do so.  If you want to say that Trump is exceeding his authority, that's another argument, but it is just blatant ignorance to claim the President has no authority to impose tariffs.  

Here's what a quick Google tells us...........

Congress has passed laws allowing the president to impose tariffs under specific conditions. These include the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232) for national security threats, the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301) for unfair trade practices, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) during national emergencies, and Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 for international payments issues. 

Edited by GalagaGuy
Posted

So its an economic emergency that Bolsonaro was tried and convicted?  Its an economic emergency that Canada made a commercial?

Lol no sale

  • Thanks 2
Posted
2 hours ago, chasfh said:

What makes this reply low-key brilliant is everyone knows you’re talking about Trump but Trumpaholic thinks you’re talking about me.

I know. I laughed about that too.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...