Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
38 minutes ago, Motor City Sonics said:

Hillary Clinton's fault. 

Didnt properly secure it.   Were too busy redacting themselves out of the epstien files to care

Posted
13 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

I hope you are right, but with no US boots on the ground to take physical control of the levers of power and then hand them to the right people, it's still looks like a crap shoot to me. Which is definitely not saying I want US boots on the ground there.

Just an incredible answer here... We're gonna start the war and conflict and then take our bat and ball and go home

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

The oppressed people will. 

The oppressed people of Iran aren't going to do **** against the IRGC or the Basij forces.

You've been misinformed.

Either that or you're just as ignorant as the rest of MAGA's white trash clueless bigots.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

The oppressed of Iran haven't been able to do it the past several decades but somehow will be able to now without ground support from the US. 

Pure idiocy.

Posted

My gut tells me that the gulf states have put a lot of money into the Pahlavi family because they really want to butress the idea of monarchy in the region.  

Posted
52 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said:

The oppressed people of Iran aren't going to do **** against the IRGC or the Basij forces.

You've been misinformed.

Either that or you're just as ignorant as the rest of MAGA's white trash clueless bigots.

It's easy to say stuff like "the oppressed people will" from behind a keyboard in Indiana... reality will likely prove a much harder nut to crack.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

The oppressed of Iran haven't been able to do it the past several decades but somehow will be able to now without ground support from the US. 

Even looking at the supposed "triumph" of ousting Maduro in Venezuela, a relative geopolitical backwater compared to Iran, are the oppressed people there any less oppressed than they were before? Isn't the same socialist regime that conservatives have decried for years, dating back to Hugo Chavez, ultimately still in charge of the country?

It's all such a crock of horse**** to call any of these things "successes"... 

Posted

Gonna be a lot of discussion about the ways this is similar or different to Iraq.

But as someone who came of age during Iraq, platitudes like "Freedom is Never Free" to in response to deaths in combat is very similar.

And it's chilling to see that the architects of this conflict, one that they didn't even bother to justify to the American public beforehand, are running these platitudes back.

Posted
22 hours ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Damn that was quick AF, he gone. 

That's not the problem. Saddam was gone in a matter of weeks in Iraq too. It was the next 10 years of chaos, civil war, and terrorism that was the problem after the regime change of shock and awe.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

That's not the problem. Saddam was gone in a matter of weeks in Iraq too. It was the next 10 years of chaos, civil war, and terrorism that was the problem after the regime change of shock and awe.

Shock and awe was catchy. Epic Fury and Epstein Files doesn't have quite the same pizzazz. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...