Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I put together this positional depth chart, which the order can be debated, intended to demonstrate the volume of options, current and upcoming:

C : Dingler, Rogers, Valencia, Nido, Liranzo, Briceno

1B: Torkelson, Keith, Valencia, Briceno

2B: Torres, Keith, Baez, McKinstry, McGonigle, Anderson, Lee, Jung, Cruz

SS: Baez, McKinstry, McGonigle, Sweeney, Rainer, Cruz

3B: Keith, McKinstry, Vierling, Baez, McGonigle, Anderson, Jung, Lee, Cruz

LF: Greene, Vierling, Jones, Cruz

CF: Meadows, Vierling, Perez, Clark

RF: Carpenter, Perez, Vierling, Jones, Clark

If we acquire a Bregman or Bichette, for example, these are the players who become displaced for at least 2026: Keith (primarily becomes the DH), Anderson, Lee, Jung, and maybe McGonigle.  

I think this depth, particularly in the infield, is a main reason that Harris is reluctant to commit a 5-6 year contract to Bregman or Bo.  The opportunity to upgrade our lineup is in the outfield.
 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tenacious D said:

I put together this positional depth chart, which the order can be debated, intended to demonstrate the volume of options, current and upcoming:

C : Dingler, Rogers, Valencia, Nido, Liranzo, Briceno

1B: Torkelson, Keith, Valencia, Briceno

2B: Torres, Keith, Baez, McKinstry, McGonigle, Anderson, Lee, Jung, Cruz

SS: Baez, McKinstry, McGonigle, Sweeney, Rainer, Cruz

3B: Keith, McKinstry, Vierling, Baez, McGonigle, Anderson, Jung, Lee, Cruz

LF: Greene, Vierling, Jones, Cruz

CF: Meadows, Vierling, Perez, Clark

RF: Carpenter, Perez, Vierling, Jones, Clark

If we acquire a Bregman or Bichette, for example, these are the players who become displaced for at least 2026: Keith (primarily becomes the DH), Anderson, Lee, Jung, and maybe McGonigle.  

I think this depth, particularly in the infield, is a main reason that Harris is reluctant to commit a 5-6 year contract to Bregman or Bo.  The opportunity to upgrade our lineup is in the outfield.
 

If they were to land Bichette or Bregman, then there's a pretty decent chance that some of those guys you mentioned get traded to get another SP.  Some sort of package deal.  

They don't think they are WS contenders.  They think they are AL Central contenders.    So they aren't going for it all.  Now, should they look really, really good during the season, maybe they take a wild swing before Skubal goes away, but they had that season in 2025 and they didn't.  

They'd better get a King's ransom for Skubal.     

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tenacious D said:

I put together this positional depth chart, which the order can be debated, intended to demonstrate the volume of options, current and upcoming:

C : Dingler, Rogers, Valencia, Nido, Liranzo, Briceno

1B: Torkelson, Keith, Valencia, Briceno

2B: Torres, Keith, Baez, McKinstry, McGonigle, Anderson, Lee, Jung, Cruz

SS: Baez, McKinstry, McGonigle, Sweeney, Rainer, Cruz

3B: Keith, McKinstry, Vierling, Baez, McGonigle, Anderson, Jung, Lee, Cruz

LF: Greene, Vierling, Jones, Cruz

CF: Meadows, Vierling, Perez, Clark

RF: Carpenter, Perez, Vierling, Jones, Clark

If we acquire a Bregman or Bichette, for example, these are the players who become displaced for at least 2026: Keith (primarily becomes the DH), Anderson, Lee, Jung, and maybe McGonigle.  

I think this depth, particularly in the infield, is a main reason that Harris is reluctant to commit a 5-6 year contract to Bregman or Bo.  The opportunity to upgrade our lineup is in the outfield.
 

other than the hope of mcgonigle, most of that depth looks like a bunch of average to below average players.  would bichette be an upgrade on baez at short?  is mcgonigle an upgrade on keith at third?

then do what you can.  the only prospect they have who is almost untouchable should be mcgonigle and maybe clark.

  • Like 1
Posted

Jesus... Pat's been around forever.  Seems like when I was a kid he was on the roundtable on Channel 4 when they had the games... wishing him a lot of comfort.  

Sometime in the mid 90's after the Pistons missed the playoffs 2 years in a row he said they are renaming the road at the Palace to "2 lottery drive". That stuck with me as being pretty funny.

 

Posted

Effross is top of mind to me when people talk about "years of control" for relievers. He was traded with a year of service time and the control was cited. He proceeded to battle injuries and flame out.

Posted

There's something to be said for the volume strategy. Theoretically speaking, it feels as though if you spend $10MM on ten guys, you have better odds of getting something good out of one or a few of them than if you take a chance on one single reliever for the same $10MM. Devil's always in the details, of course, but if you have a good development system, the volume strategy could be an effective arrow in the quiver over time.

Posted
4 minutes ago, chasfh said:

There's something to be said for the volume strategy. Theoretically speaking, it feels as though if you spend $10MM on ten guys, you have better odds of getting something good out of one or a few of them than if you take a chance on one single reliever for the same $10MM. Devil's always in the details, of course, but if you have a good development system, the volume strategy could be an effective arrow in the quiver over time.

Don't disagree when it comes to pitching, just because so many get hurt, please just don't give me a front office that takes the same approach with hitters - you can collect all the MiLB hitters you want and they are just as likely to all fail - quality only with hitters please!

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

Don't disagree when it comes to pitching, just because so many get hurt, please just don't give me a front office that takes the same approach with hitters - you can collect all the MiLB hitters you want and they are just as likely to all fail - quality only with hitters please!

We shall see whether we have enough quality in-house, coupled with developmental acuity, to keep us in the top half of offenses in the league.

By way of reminder, here's how our hitters did last season:

Name PA wRC+
Riley Greene 655 121
Spencer Torkelson 649 118
Gleyber Torres 628 113
Zach McKinstry 511 114
Dillon Dingler 469 109
Colt Keith 468 109
Kerry Carpenter 464 115
Javier Báez 437 86
Wenceel Pérez 383 103
Trey Sweeney 326 53
Parker Meadows 213 75
Andy Ibáñez 193 84
Jahmai Jones 150 159
Jake Rogers 142 70
Justyn-Henry Malloy 127 92
Matt Vierling 100 76
Jace Jung 55 9
Ryan Kreidler 44 -12
Tomás Nido 37 101
Manuel Margot 20 67
Akil Baddoo 18 -8
Brewer Hicklen 4 307
TEAM TOTALS 6093 103
Edited by chasfh
Posted
36 minutes ago, chasfh said:

We shall see whether we have enough quality in-house, coupled with developmental acuity, to keep us in the top half of offenses in the league.

By way of reminder, here's how our hitters did last season:

Name PA wRC+
Riley Greene 655 121
Spencer Torkelson 649 118
Gleyber Torres 628 113
Zach McKinstry 511 114
Dillon Dingler 469 109
Colt Keith 468 109
Kerry Carpenter 464 115
Javier Báez 437 86
Wenceel Pérez 383 103
Trey Sweeney 326 53
Parker Meadows 213 75
Andy Ibáñez 193 84
Jahmai Jones 150 159
Jake Rogers 142 70
Justyn-Henry Malloy 127 92
Matt Vierling 100 76
Jace Jung 55 9
Ryan Kreidler 44 -12
Tomás Nido 37 101
Manuel Margot 20 67
Akil Baddoo 18 -8
Brewer Hicklen 4 307
TEAM TOTALS 6093 103

Clearly, we need more Brewer Hicklen

Posted
2 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:

Tigers sign reliever Scott Effross. He had a good 2022 until he had TJ surgery. He has sucked since then. Still...just a minor league contract, for less that 1 million bucks. He has one option left.

Lottery ticket.  I’ll allow it.

Posted
1 minute ago, theroundsquare said:

Justyn-Henry Malloy to Tampa for cold, hard cash considerations

JHM could have had a good career as an umpire. He can see pitches, he just can't hit them.

Jahmai Jones's spot got a little safer.

Posted

He had some big hits for the Tigers. His playing time was I inconsistent with the big club. I think he has potential to be a .270/.370/.470 dh, which is decent but replaceable most free agency years. I wish him well. He's going to a good org. 

Posted (edited)

hard to see how they keep him and Jones, and Jones had hit better, can play the field, and runs better. You keep JHM on the hope he hasn't hit his ceiling but the Tigers no longer have the luxury to do that to the degree Tamps does.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
2 hours ago, papalawrence said:

He had some big hits for the Tigers. His playing time was I inconsistent with the big club. I think he has potential to be a .270/.370/.470 dh, which is decent but replaceable most free agency years. I wish him well. He's going to a good org. 

That would be quite valuable if he could do it.  So far, he has not been close.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...