Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

When you factor in that Cuomo's black voters are still largely Democratic voters who are going to pull the lever for Democrats, I don't see it as this big problem as you do. Again, it's not as if these voters went Republican and voted for Sliwa. Cuomo, even though he ran as an independent, is still a Democrat. Voters who voted for him largely knew this, black voters or otherwise.

He's also a former three-term Governor of NYS and the son of a legendary former three-term Governor of NYS.

Even with his scandals, that sort of name recognition is absolutely an institutional advantage that Cuomo had going into this thing, particularly with lower information voters who don't follow the daily stuff like we do.

Just don't think the picture is complete without this context. It's not like Cuomo was a rando running as an Independent 

  • Like 4
Posted
13 hours ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

Looks like a double digit, 10 point soon possible for Spanberger.

I guess the Aunt Jemima Strategy didn't work out so well for the Trumpublicans after all.

Posted

I was just looking at the exit polls in the Va Governor race. Spanberger dominated Sears in the minority voter results. Sears, not surprising edged the Democrat in the older demos which tend to skew Republican in the state. Sears also did well in the male vote, not really surprising. 
 

In the AG race Jones strong showing among minorities and the 18-44 age voters seemed to be the main difference.

 

https://www.cnn.com/election/2025/exit-polls/virginia/general/governor/0

Posted

I'm happy with the results but still somewhat skeptical of any long term impacts.  Been through to many "waves" that supposedly reshaped the electorate and doomed a party going forward.  It was an off year federal election wise.  I sure hope this time next year I'm feeling as good though.  It's a cliche to say it so far but as long as Trump is around I'm nervous about this country.  If we can get a D congress that goes away in a big way.  

 

Posted

I'm not going to pretend I know the specific details of the hispanic/latino community in NYC, but as a whole, they tend to not like the words communist or socialist.  Mamdani easily winning that group shows the populist message he's giving resonates with them.  

As for Spanberger not only winning, but by such a margin, just shows how racist our society is still.  Oh wait, she's the white one?  Sorry, still a rookie at these DNC talking points and got ahead of myself.  

Posted

I am not unhappy with the results last night.  I don't think it was that big of a deal to elect a few democrats in traditionally blue areas. I can see the spotlight being on them for future elections, especially the guy in NYC.  He will be the star of campaign ads for the GOP.  

Posted (edited)

Re:Mamdani: the key for any mayor (or an exec for that matter) is whether he appoints based on competence or  politics. For instance, if he looks at the Mayoralty primarily to bootstrap people from DSA into prominence, he will likely fail. If he's hard headed about putting good people into civic management, he will likely succeed. 

It's no different than the way Trump consistently fails on policy - he has surrounded himself with a confederacy of dunces. Even if he were playing with a full deck, there is no way all the clowns around him can execute.

 

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Motown Bombers said:

It’s not a problem for New York City but leftist are learning the wrong lessons from this election. He only got 50% of the vote. He barely got a majority. 

The huge turnout make comparisons to any recent history tricky. Mamdani got more votes (1036K) than any mayor since 1965, but Coumo also got more votes (854K) than any *winner* since Guliani. Looks like this was the largest turnout since 1969!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_mayoral_elections

 

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
37 minutes ago, Archie said:

I am not unhappy with the results last night.  I don't think it was that big of a deal to elect a few democrats in traditionally blue areas. I can see the spotlight being on them for future elections, especially the guy in NYC.  He will be the star of campaign ads for the GOP.  

This is not the proper response.  You are supposed to say the left only won because Trump wasn’t on the ballot and then post a horrific 9/11 meme with a crossed out never forget.  

  • Like 1
Posted

I see Archie is following the Party Line. How soon they forget that Virginia has, until January, a Republican Governor, Lt Governor, and Atty General. Also both houses of the legislator lean slightly Democratic, it's only by a few votes. Hardly what I'd call a blue state. Maybe solidly purple...

 

Posted
2 hours ago, mtutiger said:

OK.

I'm sure that will be uncontroversial and free of consequences from an angry public.

Which is exactly what they want.  That way they can justify their actions from the crazy and unruly mob.   And understand,  40% of this country will be just fine with it.   At least they will be with THIS administration.  

Posted
52 minutes ago, pfife said:

It was a thorough repudiation of the GOP federal pedophile protection program that you support!  

It was less than 24 hours ago that the party line was that the NJ GOP candidate was a tossup for Governor...

Just massive massive amounts of cope

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...