1984Echoes

I have thought my way through that absolutely. I've lived my entire under your version. It takes a thought, not emotion, to reason out why it shouldn't be that way...

I'm an Independent, so I don't have a side. Russia is NOT the reason Hillary lost to Trump. Russia however, DID interfere with our election. But I would call that a contributing, not deciding factor. Trump attempted to overthrow the Constitution of the United States with a violent coup attempt. That is a VALID reason under Constitutional Amendment 14 to remove Trump from the presidential ballot. Hillary never attempted that. Like it... or not. Sorry.

I have a different version of that: Basically, I 100% disagree. This is why: IMO, if someone's "belief" is based on a lie, then it's not "honest", it is, simply, a "lie". Whether they are lying to themselves, or have been lied to and fallen for a lie, or don't have the capacity to differentiate between the truth and a lie... or for any reason, if someone is perpetuating a lie than they are still, in fact, a liar and not honest. Conveniently, MAGA is simply following Trump's lead. Who created the lie of the election being stolen prior to a single vote even being cast. Also conveniently, following Trump's lead allows someone to "pretend" to be a true believer and to "honestly" argue that Biden actually "stole" the election, based on what Trump is "sayin'"... They are all liars. IMO.

"Honestly"???

If I have this correct, you're characterizing my post as a full-on rant... because why? Because i used more than two sentences? Are posts NOT ALLOWED to have more than two sentences? But this post is OK... do I have that correct? Ewsieg personally insults me and that's OK... right? I think your personal attacks on me are prejudiced smr. You are no longer objective, AT ALL, when I post. IMO.

I don't see any RANT up above whatsoever Sue. Who are you talking to?

He hates the poorly educated. They disgust him, and you know that. But the poorly educated white trash of this country LOVE him, and MAGA consists of 99.9% of poorly educated white trash. That's who he caters to, and you know that. But go ahead and be a hypocrite, or go ahead and proceed with a dishonest conversation instead of an honest one and tell me otherwise. PS: I loved SF's post because: (A) I would like to see the Supreme Court uphold the ruling. Did you have a problem with that? (B) I would like to see other states follow suit, particularly Arizona, Michigan, PA, and Georgia. Did you have a problem with that? (C) I would love to force Trump to be a write-in candidate in every state that is possible, because it would split the Republican Party in two. Then they could restart as two parties, one MAGA Republican Party, and one Establishment Republicans that decrees it's platform to be: a balanced budget, globalism, socially moderate, anti-fascist, experts in finance & foreign policy, secure borders, etc... Did you have a problem with that. I didn't even mean my love of SF's post to concern that last point that you decided to pick out of 4 different key points... But since you've mentioned it: Trump caters to the poorly educated and you know that to be true. If you wanna claim otherwise, I'm calling you a LIAR.

12... So yeah, Fidrych caught my fanboy's attention...

THIS... I would absolutely love.

How many times are we allowed to do this? "I can do this all day", in my best Steve Rogers voice....

Neil Young - Live Rust Paul Simon - The Rhythm of the Saints Sting & the Blue Turtles - Bring On The Night Mazzy Star - She Hangs Brightly Radiohead - In Rainbows The Beatles - Let It Be Cowboy Junkies - 200 More Miles Bjork - Debut Black Sabbath - The Mob Rules Depeche Mode - The Singles 86-98

We won't really be able to determine if people (in general) have had enough of Trump until the 2024 election ballots are all in and counted.

That's how I would look at it too...

That could just be the "trendy" or "cool" pick in the current polls but doesn't reflect voting booth reality. IMO. Basically same thing chas is sayin'....

Well he definitely left us with a lot of decent players/ prospects... But we don't know where those guys get us or if Harris can fix the holes/ get better talent/ develop them better/ etc... to build us into an actual contender.

We were discussing this earlier... Specifically because it looks like he Tigers are going to end up with quite a few of them. Faedo, Holton, Brieske, Wentz, Alexander (before he left). May have more than that too, counting AAA... "Failed starters" or "middle-relievers" or "good-only-1-time-thru-the-batting-order" guys... whatever we want to call them... I'd rather have 5 starters go 5 innings (or if it's a tandem to keep innings low then Mize/Manning can alternate 5 inning starts and 4 inning "closes")... And 3 or 4 middle relievers that can go 2-3 innings, and have those guys get us to the 8th/ 9th inning 1-inning-guys rather than go through 4 or 5 relievers every single game. That drops it to 2 relievers often, 3 relievers occasionally, and more than that infrequently.

And he just passed away... Loved his acting...

This reminds me of Industrial from the late 80's: Nitzer Ebb Front 242 Front Line Assembly Ministry Nine Inch Nails... especially when Reznor really started to get into sound experimentation...

I saw them in '83 when I was at Fort Bragg... Metalhead days...

All the Young Dudes seem to be blossoming nicely...

Freakin' OUTSTANDING...!!!

And 1st downs are better than 3 plunges for 2 yards each into the line...!

Run that damn clock off!!!

The replay showed his eyes up on the ball tracking it so he didn't see Raymond's fair catch signal which... that signal was pretty minimal to be honest...

"injured while sliding awkwardly" hopefully just means a groin pull or something like that...