1984Echoes

So the "moderates" did buckle. And the answer to this question is: Mike Johnson. (With a noted look of disappointment/ resignation on my face...).

The Milwaukee Bucks "Long-armed defenders" defense. We can only hope to get there (or at least a reasonable facsimile) one day...

PS: Just because Keith is closer to MLB, and came into the system as a 3B'man... I THINK I would prefer to send Jung over... but that's a really hard call so... I'm glad I'm not the one who has to make that decision...

I would be good with obtaining Kim if that's doable for us... It probably would include 1 of Keith or Jung, just a guess, but flip a coin on which one to send back over... plus other (minor league) secondary pieces, like a Flores or Hurter, my guess...

Yamamoto and Hader are free agents. Why is that laughable versus the Padres, out of the goodness of their heart, sending us Soto or Tatis?

Yamamoto, Hader, and Tatis if we can finagle that trade...

First question(s): What's going on with Hayes, and Ivey? They are not doing what we thought they would be doing, at least by pre-season expectations... IE: Is Hayes actually breaking out? Is Ivey relegated to the bench or does he ascend (all dependent on his defensive play...) back to a starting spot? Is he BETTER as a 6th man than as a starter?

I think they're going to coalesce around Johnson. He of election denial/ refusal to certify the electoral count/ and author of the amicus brief to the Supreme Court to suspend MI/ PA/ etc's votes in an attempt to overturn 2020. And the "moderates" are good with this. Is anyone in the Republican Party still interested in democracy? The Constitution of the United States? The United States of America itself? Do they want to split off the center/south of the country and create United Whites Only America States? Just asking...

This still has to pass Turkey's legislature and then... Hungary is still playing ****ing games with this and they also have not passed Sweden's admission through their legislation. Their government says yes, their legislature says... nothing, so far. Proposal: Hungary's authoritarianism and still-boot-licking of Russia/ Putin is also vexing NATO and the EU... so, solution: England/ Germany/ US (whomever) propose to kick Hungary out of NATO and add Sweden. Hungary can not vote on getting kicked out of NATO so only all other countries aside from them can vote on this measure. I don't think this measure would even need to come to a vote as I think the Proposal itself will move Hungary off their asses and do a swift approval of Sweden's accession into NATO. However, if it actually did come to a vote anyways, I wouldn't be opposed to holding that vote, nor would I cry over Hungary's expulsion. The reality is that Poland and Turkey would vote to NOT expel Hungary... but I think even HAVING this vote would send a HUGE message(s) to everyone in NATO: Quit ****ing around with Putin. Quit ****ing around with anti-democratic authoritarianism. And get your ****ing priorities straight. Just my 2 cents.

Just thought I would toss this into the discussion ring for those season long types of issues...

To whit: https://www.yahoo.com/news/screwed-anguished-house-gop-seeks-233759265.html ...Yet there’s little hope for relief among the bitterly divided GOP, where the fruitless search for a speaker has become so miserable that some members even floated a return to former Speaker Kevin McCarthy — with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) as an “assistant speaker.” (The idea has not been taken seriously inside the conference, though McCarthy later received 40-plus votes on the final ballot, coming in second to Johnson.) Others are again mulling ways to empower acting Speaker Patrick McHenry, maybe even without a formal vote on the floor, an idea that risks constitutional challenges. “The animosity is high,” Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) said. Fellow Floridian Rep. Mike Waltz, added: “My fear is that if we keep doing this somebody is going to side with the Democrats."

Straight: They'll bring it to the floor to try and pressure for Johnson to win, even if he doesn't have the 217 in conference. Which opens the floor up to anything, including 5 deciding to do a switch to Jeffries in order to end the pain. Subterfuge: Mods say: "yeah yeah, sure... we're on board"; but do not actually agree with any agreement that caters to the Fascist Faction. On the full House vote...

👍

The Dems can send any signals they want... It means nothing until the Republicans FIRST state: "Let's talk." Nothing happens until then. The only choice the Dems have, at this point, is to vote 100% Jeffries. They get nothing anyways... so just wait to see if the Republicans will eventually talk to them (0% chance. At this point in time. Republicans already stated "We don't talk with the Dems until we hit rock bottom"). Have they hit rock bottom yet?

How about both?

The moderates could, possibly, fold not to MAGA but to bipartisanship and vote for Jeffries. It would be an FU to Trump & MAGA (who deserve it); and probably an FU to their careers. But in the name of the Constitution of the United States of America, they should do it.

On the Vikings: The Lions just need to win ("just"?) their two matchups and they're good. The Vikings are still a pretty damn good team, as they were last year. Just with different luck/ different year. They look like the 2nd best team in the division, as long as the Lions win their matchups and with a 2-game lead, we've pretty much got the division. On playoff matchup nightmares (IE: '91 Redskins), noone scares me in the NFC except the Eagles. Not the 49'ers, not the Seahawks, not the Cowboys or anyone else... just the Eagles. Super Bowl? Crazy thought... but if we were to actually get there, it'd be the Chiefs (at 100% or close-to-it health), the Ravens, and Miami's offense.

I think that was more the Org pushing their versatility mantra rather than a final summation of where Wenceel should play (as a utility guy). Even if that might be all he is anyways. I'm still interested to see what happens on the field before calling it as one way or the other (or as a AAAA player, which may also be a possibility). And I get you're trying to read tea leaves here (or the stark lack thereof...); but I'm going to stick with "just see what happens" or "see it to believe it", either of which works well enough for me. I don't believe a lack of touting a prospect necessarily = a lack of love. But, we'll see...

OK... I'm signing on to this...

Turkey’s Erdogan Backs Sweden NATO Membership After Long Delay https://finance.yahoo.com/news/turkey-erdogan-backs-sweden-nato-153334096.html

What does that mean exactly? Do you have any specific management quotes to that effect? Because he was in AAA this year. (not kicked to the street like a guy they aren't interested in...)

Cruzer and I have been big on him for around 6 or so... Yeah, only 23.

Looking forward to the day I can turn you into a Brodric Martin convert... 😉

I definitely agree with this...

I thought that was SS and he was fine at 2B. I could be wrong though... I believe he has superior range over most of these other guys... glove/ hands/ pivot/ arm all come into play as well... So I don't know the answer to that to be honest...