gehringer_2 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 23 minutes ago, pfife said: Jeez that 'since 2003' wpuld include the great recession. Thats spectacularly bad. The headline sentence appears to just be wrong. He's actually excepting years in actual recession (2008,2009,2020). Sort of saying "the worst year except for the ones that were even worser." Worst non-recession year since 2003 is still saying a lot though. Another example of how GDP, which is what defines recessions, is not really coupled to the economic outcome for most workers anymore. Edited 1 hour ago by gehringer_2 Quote
pfife Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: The headline sentence appears to just be wrong. He's actually excepting years in actual recession (2008,2009,2020). Sort of saying "the worst year except for the ones that were even worser." Worst non-recession year since 2003 is still saying a lot though. Another example of how GDP, which is what defines recessions, is not really coupled to the economic outcome for most workers anymore. I see what you're saying thanks for pointing that out. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted just now Posted just now 1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said: The headline sentence appears to just be wrong. He's actually excepting years in actual recession (2008,2009,2020). Sort of saying "the worst year except for the ones that were even worser." Worst non-recession year since 2003 is still saying a lot though. Another example of how GDP, which is what defines recessions, is not really coupled to the economic outcome for most workers anymore. Essentially the worst since the last time Republicans were in office. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.