Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

from Kavanaugh:
"Although I firmly disagree with the Court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a President’s ability to order tariffs going forward. That is because numerous other federal statutes authorize the President to impose tariffs and might justify most (if not all) of the tariffs at issue in this case — albeit perhaps with a few additional procedural steps that IEEPA, as an emergency statute, does not require. Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232); the Trade Act of 1974 (Sections 122, 201, and 301); and the Tariff Act of 1930 (Section 338). In essence, the Court today concludes that the President checked the wrong statutory box by relying on IEEPA rather than another statute to impose these tariffs."

Directing Trump, here's how you can ignore the Supreme Court's ruling.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

So there are farmers counting on tarriff money...socialism. Some taxpayers believed Trump was going to hand out $2000 to them and many companies are taking Trump's corrupt administration to court to get the illegal tarriff tax they paid, back. Trump's illegal acts are going to cost Ametican taxpayers billions of dollars. Deporting immigrants, who were paying taxes, is going to end up costing even more billions of dollars. Everything Trump touches, dies. Steaks, vodka, college, casinos, airlines and now the entire economy of the United States. So much winning....really owning the liberals....it's a disaster...a man-made disaster. Does DonOld think he can write off an economy bankruptcy on his taxes...lmao

Posted
1 hour ago, ben9753 said:

from Kavanaugh:
"Although I firmly disagree with the Court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a President’s ability to order tariffs going forward. That is because numerous other federal statutes authorize the President to impose tariffs and might justify most (if not all) of the tariffs at issue in this case — albeit perhaps with a few additional procedural steps that IEEPA, as an emergency statute, does not require. Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232); the Trade Act of 1974 (Sections 122, 201, and 301); and the Tariff Act of 1930 (Section 338). In essence, the Court today concludes that the President checked the wrong statutory box by relying on IEEPA rather than another statute to impose these tariffs."

Directing Trump, here's how you can ignore the Supreme Court's ruling.

Yeah, it couldn't have been anything as good as a complete defeat for him. He might have them dragged up to the tallest building in DC and push out the top floor window if they ever did that.

Posted
Just now, Edman85 said:

Fixed that for ya...

I texted someone this morning that this means war on Iran is right around the corner. Maybe even tonight, seeing how it's Friday.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...