Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, monkeytargets39 said:

Not sure why they’re higher on Liranzo than Briceno.  The K/BB rates are night and day

Because Liranzo  is a switch hitter who can actually stick at catcher and has an above average ops in AA while being young for the league.  He also has a history similar to Dingler of a significant adjustment period to a new league-probably in part to handling the pitching staff.

 

Briceno is a better hitting prospect, but Liranzo has a true chance to be a power hitting.775-.850 switching hitting catcher which there aren’t to many of.

Posted
57 minutes ago, 4hzglory said:

Because Liranzo  is a switch hitter who can actually stick at catcher and has an above average ops in AA while being young for the league.  He also has a history similar to Dingler of a significant adjustment period to a new league-probably in part to handling the pitching staff.

 

Briceno is a better hitting prospect, but Liranzo has a true chance to be a power hitting.775-.850 switching hitting catcher which there aren’t to many of.

Yep...like Mickey Tettleton back in the 90's.  Advanced stats weren't much of a thing back then so his OBP and good power numbers didn't get the respect they deserved

  • Like 2
Posted

Toledo W 7-1
Lee 1/5 2K
Sweeney 1/4 K
Malloy 3/3 RBI
Jung 1/3 2RBI BB HR
Cruz 2/3 RBI BB

Erie W 11-5
Clark 2/5 BB 2B 3B
Liranzo 1/6 RBI
McGonigle 2/4 2RBI BB 2B
Anderson 1/4 RBI BB
Briceno 1/4 RBI

 

 

WM W 3-2
Pacheco 0/2 RBI BB
Graham 0/2 2BB

 

Lakeland L 4-3
Strong 1/5 BB 2K 2B
Rucker 1/4 RBI
Elissalt 6IP 3H ER 3BB 6K

DSL
Rodriguez 1/4 2K 2B
Miranda 0/3 BB K

Posted
4 hours ago, theroundsquare said:

"here to stay" -- in Toledo -- maybe not so good

OK, so not to play too much into things but since he has changed his stance he has actually played really well. I can't remember the exact date but it was around 6/19. Since 6/19 he has a .275/.409/.480 line good for .890 OPS while walking 18.9% of the time and K'ing 26%. Now will that translate to the Majors? No idea but he has played much better for the last 6 weeks than his season numbers reflect.

Posted
7 hours ago, Shinzaki said:

Small sample size..but it's nice to see Clark posting better numbers in AA than high A

 

just a guess, but I suspect he was bored at WMI - the BB was sky high because pitchers did not want to throw him strikes

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RatkoVarda said:

just a guess, but I suspect he was bored at WMI - the BB was sky high because pitchers did not want to throw him strikes

My Occam's Razor guess is park effects/weather.

Posted

Toledo W 4-1
Lee 1/4 RBI K HR
Sweeney 1/4 2K
Mallot 1/3 BB K
Jung 1/3 RBI BB
Dobnak 4IP 3H ER 3BB 7K
Mattison .2IP BB K
Petit 1.1IP 2K
Heuer 1IP K

 

Erie L 4-1
McGonigle 0/4 BB K
Briceno 2/4 K

WM W 7-5
Pacheco 0/4 BB 2K
Graham 1/3 BB
Peck 2/4 2RBI BB HR 2B
Castillo 4IP 3H 2ER 2BB 3K

Lakeland W 6-5 10 Inn.
Macdonald 0/3 BB 2K
Strong 1/4 RBI BB 
Rucker 1/4 BB K
Reyes 5IP 4H 2ER BB 2K

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Since we are getting closer to the end of the DSL let's check in on our 2025 signees. These are the more notable signings, and as always, any DSL/FCL stat lines should be taken with a grain of salt. 

INF Sterling Bazil (Dominican Republic)  .161/.301/.589
C Carlos Benavides (Venezuela)  .263/.357/.761
INF Angel De Los Santos (Dominican Republic) .434/.522/1.182 (SSS, 19 games)
LHP Anderson Diaz (Venezuela) 0-6 9.00ERA 
OF Jose Ramirez (Venezuela) .254/.359/.744
OF Cris Rodriguez (Dominican Republic) .324/.348/.916

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...