Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, 1776 said:

Disappointing game. I don’t see this series going beyond tomorrow. 

Likely not. But if they can win tomorrow, they have Skubal and have a chance. Flawed team. One note shot

Posted

Maybe they’ll win tomorrow. Then go back to Seattle, so there’s still a chance…

I can’t help but think there’s something more than statistical regression going on here. But I’m not particularly well qualified to assess what that is. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, papalawrence said:

NY hr, up 7-6

Now 9-6. And the direct impact it has on the Tigers is that if the Yankees win the Tigers game remains at 3pm. If the Jays complete the sweep, the Tigers play at 7. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, lordstanley said:

Now 9-6. And the direct impact it has on the Tigers is that if the Yankees win the Tigers game remains at 3pm. If the Jays complete the sweep, the Tigers play at 7. 

2nd fiddle to the big boys

Posted
1 minute ago, papalawrence said:

2nd fiddle to the big boys

Yes, and I hate it too, but I have to respect the reasoning behind it. New York is the biggest DMA and the Yankees are the bigger team within it. They are the symbol of baseball as a sport throughout the world, and more people in the US identify as Yankee fans, rightly or wrongly, than with any other team. It sucks and it's never gonna change, but lemonade, it also makes seeing them lose that much sweeter.

Posted

Lately I've been thinking that a percentage of Aug 2024 to Aug 2025 was a mirage. Harris helped put together a Giants team with several short term contracts, and they unexpectedly won 107 games in 2021. They lost to the Dodgers in the NLDS. The next year the Giants went 81-81. They've been sub .500 since. Maybe Steve Phillips is right, typically a contender needs an everyday superstar. Cleveland has Ramirez. KC has Whitt Jr. Detroit does have Skubal, but Greene is the only position player that is in the "star" convo. 

Teams win without a superstar. Takes plenty of good fortune. Even with a superstar. Now watch the Tigers win the next 2

Posted
52 minutes ago, papalawrence said:

2nd fiddle to the big boys

Plus I, as a diehard Tigers fan, could barely make it through today's game. Any neutral would have clicked off by the 5th inning. Yankees-Blue Jays has star power and run scoring.

Posted
45 minutes ago, papalawrence said:

Maybe Steve Phillips is right, typically a contender needs an everyday supersta

I don't know if you need a batting superstar, but you need some pretty good guys who are at least consistent at the whatever level they play - i.e. don't slump much/often. Ramirez is only an 850 OPS - that's borderline "great hitter", but his worst month was 715 and he has virtually no platoon split (being a SH helps there but is still no guarantee) - so he always shows up and he's a threat against all pitching. The Tigers absolutely are missing that.

Torkleson has probably been the most consistent Tiger hitter, but he's not a good enough hitter overall to carry things. The rest of them either are slump prone or have big platoon splits - making them neutralizable when needed.

Posted
9 hours ago, lordstanley said:

Plus I, as a diehard Tigers fan, could barely make it through today's game. Any neutral would have clicked off by the 5th inning. Yankees-Blue Jays has star power and run scoring.

I agree. When it flipped to fs2 I took a nap

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

I don't know if you need a batting superstar, but you need some pretty good guys who are at least consistent at the whatever level they play - i.e. don't slump much/often. Ramirez is only an 850 OPS - that's borderline "great hitter", but his worst month was 715 and he has virtually no platoon split (being a SH helps there but is still no guarantee) - so he always shows up and he's a threat against all pitching. The Tigers absolutely are missing that.

Torkleson has probably been the most consistent Tiger hitter, but he's not a good enough hitter overall to carry things. The rest of them either are slump prone or have big platoon splits - making them neutralizable when needed.

That's a great way to frame what they're missing. It seems a lot of teams are missing that, even ones with more stars. There were so many extended losing streaks this year, even amongst the top tier teams. Maybe hitting (in general) is still adjusting to the fact that most every team has pitchers that throw 99mph and/or have a 2500+ spin rate. It has become a different game. I heard Trout talk about this.

Edited by papalawrence
Posted
17 hours ago, monkeytargets39 said:

Big Dumpers dumper.

 

Meh, I’ve seen bigger.

Can I tell you just how much I hate that nickname? Actively ****ing hate it. Two reasons: (1) I don't ever, ever want to have to contemplate a ballplayer's ass, for any reason; (2) taking a dump is the exact equivalent of taking a ****, and I don't want to have to contemplate that during ballgames, either. Just terrible all around.

Posted
1 hour ago, chasfh said:

Can I tell you just how much I hate that nickname? Actively ****ing hate it. Two reasons: (1) I don't ever, ever want to have to contemplate a ballplayer's ass, for any reason; (2) taking a dump is the exact equivalent of taking a ****, and I don't want to have to contemplate that during ballgames, either. Just terrible all around.

Most jock nicknames are either gross or unimaginative.  The gross ones don't usually reach the public.  It might have started out as something gross, but now it is just a name fans associate with Raleigh.   I don't think most fans think of him  taking a **** when they hear his name. 

Posted

Ron Mexico was the worst nickname.  It was for Michael Vick and he got it because he had an std and went to a clinic but didn't want anyone to know who he was so he gave that as his name.

The NFL even banned the name for personalized jerseys from their site 

Posted
2 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

Most jock nicknames are either gross or unimaginative.  The gross ones don't usually reach the public.  It might have started out as something gross, but now it is just a name fans associate with Raleigh.   I don't think most fans think of him  taking a **** when they hear his name. 

I sure do, and I can’t be the only one on the planet that occurs to.

I wonder whether his teammates call him “big ****ter” and they just sanitized it for public consumption.

Posted
4 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I sure do, and I can’t be the only one on the planet that occurs to.

I wonder whether his teammates call him “big ****ter” and they just sanitized it for public consumption.

That is cetainly possible.  I remember in high school cross country, we had ****head1 and ****head2, Peter *****, Groin and reefer among others.  

  • MotownWebGuy changed the title to 10/7/2025 Mariners @ Tigers 4:08 PM ALDS Game 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...