gehringer_2 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, NorthWoods said: Agreed. But the counterpoint would be that the Harris carping has been going on for long before the month of May. Even as we were winning and making the post season in the last 2 years it was very nearly a constant. these crazy slumps are a weird thing though - three times in three yrs? there has to be some aspect of something they are doing/not doing that's different from what other orgs do because when the Tigers drop into a funk, they stay there way too long. Quote
papalawrence Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I don't like the fact that multiple gm's have said that they dread dealing with Harris. Some charm and ability to schmooze is important in that role. Harris might be worse at it tan AA. Dombrowski was a master at it. Quote
Shelton Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: CF was not the major source of their problem- if anything IF D was as bad or worse, it was poor run production and poor pitching = mostly relief. They gave up 19 more runs in may than april, but scored 37 less.(one game difference in total games I'm ignoring) The increase in runs against is both pitching and defense - say you split xs runs allowed 50/50 between fielding and pitching then ~46 of the 56 run differential was still in hitting or pitching, mostly hitting. The tigers have the second worst CF DRS in baseball at -8. Worst is pit at -9. And I can’t say for sure but I suspect that playing corner OF in CF and IF/DH types in corner OF also doesn’t help. 1 Quote
Tenacious D Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, papalawrence said: I don't like the fact that multiple gm's have said that they dread dealing with Harris. Some charm and ability to schmooze is important in that role. Harris might be worse at it tan AA. Dombrowski was a master at it. Hard for anyone to compete with this “Dombrowski on line one…” 1 Quote
IdahoBert Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago It’s weird, but the Tigers have two off days in the next five days. Then deep into June and in early July, they play 14 days in a row then have a road series in Texas with the Rangers with an off day stuck in the middle of that series. Quote
Edman85 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I'd rather have a POBO that is tougher to deal with than one easy to deal with... Quote
chasfh Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, Edman85 said: I'd rather have a POBO that is tougher to deal with than one easy to deal with... Others would rather have a PBO who can pull an All-Star out of their hat. Quote
chasfh Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, chasfh said: I think for a lot of the fans you describe, there's not just a little anti-intellecualism going on with that, and to your point, I also believe it's driven by his youth and intelligence, but also, his slight build and soft face that do not resemble those of most major league ballplayers. If he were an ex-ballplayer in the exact same position saying and doing the exact same things in the exact same way, he'd be getting a far wider berth from those fans you describe. @gehringer_2 what’s the part of this that’s confusing you? Quote
Tiger337 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, Edman85 said: I'd rather have a POBO that is tougher to deal with than one easy to deal with... I'd rather have neither. I want a GM that is reasonble to deal with but has boundaries. If a GM makes unreasonable demands and has no flexibility then he will have limited opportunity to make deals because other teams don't want to work with him. I don't know if that applies to Harris, but if multiple teams are complaining about him, I don't necessarily view it as a positive. 1 Quote
papalawrence Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: I'd rather have neither. I want a GM that is reasonble to deal with but has boundaries. If a GM makes unreasonable demands and has no flexibility then he will have limited opportunity to make deals because other teams don't want to work with him. I don't know if that applies to Harris, but if multiple teams are complaining about him, I don't necessarily view it as a positive. Yessir I concur Quote
chasfh Posted 48 minutes ago Author Posted 48 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: I'd rather have neither. I want a GM that is reasonble to deal with but has boundaries. If a GM makes unreasonable demands and has no flexibility then he will have limited opportunity to make deals because other teams don't want to work with him. I don't know if that applies to Harris, but if multiple teams are complaining about him, I don't necessarily view it as a positive. It might also be a case of them complaining about it in public because they can’t roll him like they did Avila, maybe with a dash of them trying to publicly embarrass him hoping that will soften him up. Quote
4hzglory Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago 1 minute ago, chasfh said: It might also be a case of them complaining about it in public because they can’t roll him like they did Avila, maybe with a dash of them trying to publicly embarrass him hoping that will soften him up. Exactly. Like If they were upset he wouldn’t include Melton or Rainer for example in a deadline deal last year. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.