chasfh Posted September 13 Posted September 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, oblong said: It just comes down to the fact that conservatives are so brainwashed and spoon fed and sheltered that any statement not in full compliance with their beliefs is seen as confrontational and that extends to saying things like celebrating or mocking. Their brains can’t process context everything has to be an absolute. Because their particular strain of religion demands absolute certainty and zero compromise. It’s all related and of a kind. Edited September 13 by chasfh 1 Quote
chasfh Posted September 13 Posted September 13 (edited) 10 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: Ironically, the former does exactly help make the latter possible. Condition someone to always just accept doctrine, then suddenly remove the constraints - and the moral reasoning muscle is deeply atrophied. It may go in a lot of wrong directions before it ever (hopefully) does find its ground. I know all the modern understanding about young brains, but all the more reason they should start being challenged with taking moral responsibility for themselves early, when the stakes are still low and they can learn their own way. I always thought Judaism was onto to something then they told a 13yr old it was time to grow up and start taking responsibility for yourself. If you are 13 with half an ounce of sense, you can figure out what is right and wrong for yourself if given the chance. But that's what too many parents are afraid or, or are being taught to be afraid of by the people they allow themselves to be led by. This gets me to wondering how much failed helicopter parenting has to do with this, if anything. Hypothetically, I can envision where many parents believe it’s going to be as easy as pushing buttons to control their kids growing up—then, when the kids reach the age of pushing back, the parents don’t know how to handle that (perhaps because their own parents didn’t model effective parenting for them), they freak out at the pushback, then go 100% hands off, leaving the kids to their own devices for basically the rest of their childhoods, while the failed parents simply focus on their own interests. How common is that, I wonder. Edited September 13 by chasfh Quote
Tigermojo Posted September 13 Posted September 13 I think a lot of these shooters are simply copycats. They idolize previous shooters and they want the infamy. The families may not even know about their obsession. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 hour ago, chasfh said: Because their particular strain of religion demands absolute certainty and zero compromise. It’s all related and of a kind. There are all kinds of studies out there to purport to show that conservatives and liberals have fundamentally different psychological profiles that draw them to various institutions that match those profiles. I guess there is always some level of chicken/egg question with those kinds of conclusions. Quote
oblong Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 hour ago, chasfh said: Because their particular strain of religion demands absolute certainty and zero compromise. It’s all related and of a kind. Precisely. I once told a fundamentalist friend about how “weird” Christianity is when you think about it. I was complimenting their faith. Meaning the definition of the word itself. When you spend your whole life in a belief system then it crosses into common sense territory. You become numb to it. Of course Jesus died then one again. But step away for a minute and try to focus on how strange that is. They thought I was being sacrilegious or confrontational. It was the opposite actually but they get scared when you second guess. Quote
chasfh Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 hours ago, oblong said: Precisely. I once told a fundamentalist friend about how “weird” Christianity is when you think about it. I was complimenting their faith. Meaning the definition of the word itself. When you spend your whole life in a belief system then it crosses into common sense territory. You become numb to it. Of course Jesus died then one again. But step away for a minute and try to focus on how strange that is. They thought I was being sacrilegious or confrontational. It was the opposite actually but they get scared when you second guess. I think that might be because they are actually afraid of what God will do to them once they put any critical thought into it. Critical thought is the diametric opposite of faith, and as such threatens the very foundation of faith. It's why many fundamentalist people are suspicious of the very idea of education itself, even starting with grade school, but certainly at levels beyond that when young adults begin to be exposed to previously unencountered ideas. Ideas threaten God. Quote
oblong Posted September 13 Posted September 13 I remember how it came about. We were going on about Scientology. Then I threw in…. “Well but….” I go with Bill Burrs take on why Scientology is weird. Speaking of Hubbard “this guy has a drivers license”. Meaning it started not that long ago. Quote
chasfh Posted September 16 Posted September 16 (edited) 17 hours ago, oblong said: As seen on Kash Patel's desk: Edited September 16 by chasfh Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted September 16 Posted September 16 Well look at that…. I guess we can back off the right wing conspiracy. Quote
pfife Posted September 16 Posted September 16 Breaking news: a person who didnt shoot Charles Kirk is trans. Checkmate libs Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted September 16 Posted September 16 JUST IN: Tyler Robinson's mother expressed concern that her son had become left-leaning, pro-gay, and pro-trans in the last year. Utah County DA Jeff Gray also confirmed the etched inscriptions on the bullet casings. "Robinson's mother expressed concern to her husband that the suspect shooter looked like Robinson. Robinson's father agreed." "Robinson's mother explained that over the last year or so, Robinson had become more political and had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro gay and trans rights oriented." "She stated that Robinson began to date his roommate, a biological male who was transitioning genders." Quote
Tigermojo Posted September 16 Posted September 16 Pretty scary to think it took him about a week to decide to carry out his attack. He thought he was going to get away with it. I jumped to conclusions about the groyper theory. I think the answer is we should be more accepting and respectful of each other. Quote
pfife Posted September 16 Posted September 16 I remember when Fox news told me the 2020 Election was stolen and then they paid 775m because they lied about it. Hard pass. Quote
chasfh Posted September 17 Posted September 17 11 hours ago, Edman85 said: Prediction: because of the amateur hour nature of the current DOJ brass and public statements from Trump/Patel before he was charged, Robinson walks either by technicality from partisan overcharging or some kind of Miranda violation. No chance. He’s going to die. Quote
mtutiger Posted September 18 Posted September 18 On 9/16/2025 at 9:03 PM, Edman85 said: Prediction: because of the amateur hour nature of the current DOJ brass and public statements from Trump/Patel before he was charged, Robinson walks either by technicality from partisan overcharging or some kind of Miranda violation. Given their track record getting convictions in DC/LA during their occupations, it's definitely a possibility. Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Great job toning down the rhetoric! Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii spoke out against the Trump administration's tariffs on Thursday, declaring that small businesses "are taking it in the neck with these tariffs," and then stood firmly behind her comment after Small Business Administration Administrator Kelly Loeffler accused her of "calculated, violent rhetoric." 1 Quote
romad1 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 On 9/17/2025 at 9:05 AM, chasfh said: No chance. He’s going to die. Chances of this being an extrajudicial killing by fellow inmate are higher than a straight sentencing for the death penalty. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 1 hour ago, Tigeraholic1 said: Great job toning down the rhetoric! Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii spoke out against the Trump administration's tariffs on Thursday, declaring that small businesses "are taking it in the neck with these tariffs," and then stood firmly behind her comment after Small Business Administration Administrator Kelly Loeffler accused her of "calculated, violent rhetoric." You don’t really know what that means do you? Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 13 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: You don’t really know what that means do you? I sure do. Yet she couldn’t use a term about financial loss other than “taking it to the neck” in the current political environment? Of course we know the answer to that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.