Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, Edman85 said:

Gonna be some transactions tomorrow...

  • Alex Lange's 7 day DFA window is up.
  • It's the 40-man roster deadline.
  • Because the non-tender deadline is Friday, a lot of non-tenders just get DFA'ed tomorrow to jump the gun. Even some non-arb guys may be chopped. Note: anybody injured or anybody selected to the 40-man after August 15 can't be outrighted, so they may be prime non-tender candidates. Teams like non-tendering, because you can just agree to a minor league deal and not risk losing guys to waivers. It also doesn't count as a release, which is significant because players released after Labor Day can't be added back to your major league roster until May.
  • We might get a guy or two on the non-tender bubble avoiding arbitration.

Can't edit for some reason, but Lange's day of reckoning is actually tomorrow. I forgot to mention the Gleyber QO. And finally, injured players can be outrighted today, but cannot be from today until March.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

I actually would like to see RAR rather than WAR regardless of how the stat is constructed.  I think of Wins as more of team stat.  Players don't win games by themselves.  They win partial games by producing and preventing runs.  And it's pretty easy to translate into wins if someone favors that.  It's basically just dividing by 10 (as you suggested in your post).  

Player's individual accomplishments do contribute to run totals, runs do contribute to wins, and there's good research indicating that ten marginal runs contributed by a player results in a win, so I think it's valid to express it in wins.

Edited by chasfh
Posted
13 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

For the casual fan, I agree wins sounds good, but then I can imagine someone asking: "which games did he win"? 

I view this as a question different from, "how many wins did he contribute to?"

Posted

Edman desperately and admirably trying to shift the conversation to potential player transactions only to be dismissed by the WAR squad.  Pretty sure I can speak for Idaho Bert and I when I say, thank you.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Tenacious D said:

Edman desperately and admirably trying to shift the conversation to potential player transactions only to be dismissed by the WAR squad.  Pretty sure I can speak for Idaho Bert and I when I say, thank you.

Actually I am interested in the WAR talk. I have been meaning to sit down and refresh myself on the inner workings of the different systems.

Having said that, it is a pretty significant week on the roster front. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I view this as a question different from, "how many wins did he contribute to?"

I would assume that a two-win player contributed to a lot more than two wins.  The Tigers theoretically won two more games because Baez was on the team rather than Kreidler, but surely Baez contributed to a lot more wins than two.  I am not sure everyone gets the distinction or even thinks about it, but I have heard people claim things like the Tigers would have lost 100 games if Skubal was not on the team.   

Posted
54 minutes ago, RatkoVarda said:

Harris doesn't want him; 3 years in a row with K rate over 31%

Also, I don't think I have any interest in guaranteeing a 26-man slot to the flawed center fielder with no big league experience who is the #42 guy in the Orioles system.

Posted
1 hour ago, chasfh said:

Player's individual accomplishments do contribute to run totals, runs do contribute to wins, and there's good research indicating that ten marginal runs contributed by a player results in a win, so I think it's valid to express it in wins.

But I think the correlation between production and actual runs is higher than the correlation between production and wins.   

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

But I think the correlation between production and actual runs is higher

You are basically talking about run or RBI opportunity here, and that is a function of team OBP, or even more specifically the OBP/OPS of players immediately around a player in the lineup, and that's still going to be a variable thing depending on the quality of the team isn't it? At the limits, you can double every time at bat and contribute zero runs if the 3 guys behind you in the lineup bat zero. You can single every time up and produce a run every time if one guy behind you always doubles before the 3rd out, etc.

So the question is how much better is the correlation of procution to runs than wins? I would think you just look at the correlation between runs and wins for that answer - because production to wins should be the product of production to runs times runs to wins?

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
26 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I would assume that a two-win player contributed to a lot more than two wins.  The Tigers theoretically won two more games because Baez was on the team rather than Kreidler, but surely Baez contributed to a lot more wins than two.  I am not sure everyone gets the distinction or even thinks about it, but I have heard people claim things like the Tigers would have lost 100 games if Skubal was not on the team.   

I don’t think we need everyone to get it, but I think if you pay enough attention to baseball stats and have heard of WAR, and care enough about it to pay a modicum of attention to it and discuss it, you aren’t the person making that claim at the end of your post. That person should be left alone, and possibly shunned. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tenacious D said:

I really hope Carly hyphenates her name, as well.  Congrats Sawyer—nicely done.

 

IMG_5779.jpeg

silent judging for tiktok location proposal

Posted
52 minutes ago, Shelton said:

I don’t think we need everyone to get it, but I think if you pay enough attention to baseball stats and have heard of WAR, and care enough about it to pay a modicum of attention to it and discuss it, you aren’t the person making that claim at the end of your post. That person should be left alone, and possibly shunned. 

Among my online friends, pretty much all of them meet this definition. In real life, most of them still use pitcher wins to evaluate pitchers. This is why I am online so much! 

Posted
7 hours ago, Edman85 said:

Can't edit for some reason, but Lange's day of reckoning is actually tomorrow. I forgot to mention the Gleyber QO. And finally, injured players can be outrighted today, but cannot be from today until March.

Any guess who we protect ?

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, SoCalTiger said:

Any guess who we protect ?

Gun to my head?

Hao Yu Lee

Trei Cruz

Thayron Liranzo

Jake Miller

RJ Petit

 

I also think Torres accepts, so that would require six DFA's.

Tanner Rainey

Sean Guenther

Jack Little

Dugan Darnell

Andy Ibanez

Drew Sommers

 

I would expect anybody DFA'd today to be non-tendered Friday and Little, Darnell, and Sommers to very quickly re-sign to minor league deals.

Edited by Edman85
  • Like 3
Posted
46 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

Among my online friends, pretty much all of them meet this definition. In real life, most of them still use pitcher wins to evaluate pitchers. This is why I am online so much! 

You are very gracious to keep your real life friends as friends, because that is a pretty major flaw in their character.

  • Haha 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

Gun to my head?

Hao Yu Lee

Trei Cruz

Thayron Liranzo

Jake Miller

RJ Petit

 

I also think Torres accepts, so that would require six DFA's.

Tanner Rainey

Sean Guenther

Jack Little

Dugan Darnell

Andy Ibanez

Drew Sommers

 

I would expect anybody DFA'd today to be non-tendered Friday and Little, Darnell, and Sommers to very quickly re-sign to minor league deals.

Spot-on. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Edman85 said:

Gun to my head?

Hao Yu Lee

Trei Cruz

Thayron Liranzo

Jake Miller

RJ Petit

 

I also think Torres accepts, so that would require six DFA's.

Tanner Rainey

Sean Guenther

Jack Little

Dugan Darnell

Andy Ibanez

Drew Sommers

 

I would expect anybody DFA'd today to be non-tendered Friday and Little, Darnell, and Sommers to very quickly re-sign to minor league deals.

THANK YOU

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...