Tiger337

I am also in favor of building through position players more than pitchers. If there is a pitcher at your pick that is obviously the best pick, then you take him. When in doubt, go with the position player.

The problem is that number is going to go way down in a couple of months when the hearings are forgotten. The event will then become something that didn't really happen because things like that can't happen in America. Trump was the President of the United States, so he couldn't have been that bad.

I assume you mean Pete Davidson? Liberals often apolgize for their transgressions. Conservatives rarely do that because they see apologizing as a weakness. Tucker Carlson has been insulting Crenshaw for his eyepatch and you will not see him apologizing nor his fans calling him to do so. You may have been thinking of Pete Franklin, the old Cleveland radio talk show host, who was perhaps the first caustic irreverent sports talk show host. He was pretty entertaining at the time. Now everybody is like that and they all suck.

I tend to jump around to different games rather that watch the Tigers for three hours and it seems as if every night some team is wearing a special uniform. It is confusing and I don't like it. The uniform is part of team identification and if they change it all the time that gets lost. Like Chasfh said, I prefer the traditional whites with an easily identifiable logo or team name font. That doesn't mean every team has to have that traditional white uniform. Some teams can be a little different, but I like to see consistency. If they choose a blue uniform, wear that uniform every day for several years. I think it's OK to mix it up for a limited number of games each year, but those alternate uniforms should be related to baseball history. The Negro League uniforms are good and occasional throw back uniforms are good.

Crenshaw tweeted that he blamed the attack on antifa. Seriously.

Trump still has a lot of power, still one of the most dangerous men in the world.

I first guessed the pick.

LOL, You're the one who brought up Biden taking a tumble! He must be living rent free inside your head.

Back then nobody cared whether a middle infielder hit for power. If they could catch and throw and not be a black hole, then they were good.

They replaced Pena with Shelton and then Casey. That's not why they won in 2006. They won because they got better players at other positions. They kind of got lucky that year too. They didn't do as well the next four years.

Schoop still leads MLB in fielding at Basebal Savant: https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/leaderboard/outs_above_average

Every single fanbase overrates their prospects.

I think the stakes are already pretty close to zero. This is a concept about which I'm skeptical though. I would think it would be harder to get up for games if nothing is at stake. I suppose it varies from player to player.

Take a look at this list. The more liberal your state is, the longer you'll live. It's almost a pefect correlation! https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/public-health/life-expectancy-by-state-cdc.html

I want a right-handed college pitcher with a history of elbow problems.

Exactly.

The price you pay for being a contender.

The prospect lists seem to be top heavy with position players which I like.

He's not wrong.

You don't need to create a new thread every time a thought enters your mind. There are so many threads now, I can never find the thread with the topic I am looking for. I would appreciate an update on the Tigers record when Reyes starts though.

Hinch will get credit for it.

In the end, I think the wealthy ultimately control both parties more than the bases do and they are only happy to see the rest of have class and identity wars.

I use to think that, but the last several years I am not so sure.

Nothing wrong with that. I don't think he's a good GM, but when I look back at the Randy Smith, it's hard to view Avila as epically bad.

One vote for Avila.