Jump to content

SCOTUS and whatnot


pfife

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, buddha said:

kamala harris on the supreme court would be....something other than kick ass.

the democrats want to dump her that bad?  lol.

it'll be jackson.  breyer clerk, black woman, liberal.  check check check.

Kamala, black women, has a D next to her, Biden doesn't have to worry about her dragging him down further.  check check and check.   🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, buddha said:

kamala harris on the supreme court would be....something other than kick ass.

the democrats want to dump her that bad?  lol.

it'll be jackson.  breyer clerk, black woman, liberal.  check check check.

IDK, I suppose they must already be polling her prospects internally, if they don't look good offering her a JOTSC might be good political move. But that would be the easy part - nominating a new veep could turn into a political disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

IDK, I suppose they must already be polling her prospects internally, if they don't look good offering her a JOTSC might be good political move. But that would be the easy part - nominating a new veep could turn into a political disaster.

easier to just kick her off the ticket.  she's not supreme court justice material.  there are plenty of other black women who are smarter and better choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, buddha said:

easier to just kick her off the ticket.  she's not supreme court justice material.  there are plenty of other black women who are smarter and better choices.

There are a lot of smarter and better choices but skin color is the only thing that matters.  The only other group that gives as much importance to race is the KKK.  The dems are sticking to their roots with their racism. The dems call that out and proud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What skill does it take to be a scotus?   Come up with the ruling you want and write a story to fake like you care about jurisprudence, boom done.   Nominate Harris if that solves 2 problems they think they have.

 

We got mfs on this board that can do that shit and do all the time.  Won't be buying stories that scotus doesn't do this because I wasn't born yesterday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Archie said:

There are a lot of smarter and better choices but skin color is the only thing that matters.  The only other group that gives as much importance to race is the KKK.  The dems are sticking to their roots with their racism. The dems call that out and proud.

Ok chief

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, pfife said:

What skill does it take to be a scotus?   Come up with the ruling you want and write a story to fake like you care about jurisprudence, boom done.   Nominate Harris if that solves 2 problems they think they have.

 

We got mfs on this board that can do that shit and do all the time.  Won't be buying stories that scotus doesn't do this because I wasn't born yesterday 

come up with the ruling you want and hire clerks to write a story to fake like you care...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Archie said:

There are a lot of smarter and better choices but skin color is the only thing that matters.  The only other group that gives as much importance to race is the KKK.  The dems are sticking to their roots with their racism. The dems call that out and proud.

I'll take a black woman SCJ just to piss off all the Archie Bunker's of the world.

Let them cry like the babies they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll go on record as saying that when ANY President states that his or her selection process will, at the very outset, exclude other candidates based on skin color, I have a problem with that. I don’t care what their preference is. Regardless of political affiliation or any other preferences, this is wrong. 
Biden’s selection may well be, in the end, the most qualified for the court. Who knows! But to publicly announce that the selection of the next nominee will be based on a racial preference (the very subject the high court will take up in coming months regarding Harvard and UNC admissions) is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 1776 said:

I’ll go on record as saying that when ANY President states that his or her selection process will, at the very outset, exclude other candidates based on skin color, I have a problem with that. 

Did you have a problem with Ronald Reagan selecting Sandra Day O'Connor? My understanding is that he intended to pick a woman with that selection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, buddha said:

plenty of black female candidates are just as qualified as anyone else.  i dont have a problem with biden choosing one for the court.

I’m not at all opposed to Biden selecting a black female candidate for the high court. I just don’t agree with the selection process disqualifying candidates, at the very outset, based on skin color. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

Did you have a problem with Ronald Reagan selecting Sandra Day O'Connor? My understanding is that he intended to pick a woman with that selection.

or clarence thomas.  they were intent on nominating a black man to replace marshall.  or acb.  they were going to nominate a woman to replace ginsburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, buddha said:

or clarence thomas.  they were intent on nominating a black man to replace marshall.  or acb.  they were going to nominate a woman to replace ginsburg.

Just thinking a little more about this, maybe it's the fact that Biden put it out there a little more up front. But still, the same thing happened prior to O'Connor's selection.

It'd be one thing if this were unprecedented, but it isn't.... I don't see the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...