gehringer_2 Posted Sunday at 11:45 PM Posted Sunday at 11:45 PM (edited) 6 hours ago, Motown Bombers said: It doesn't take a big fracture of his base to make significant political difference. He won by a small margin and Republicans have a slim lead in the house. Sure -there is always hope for a midterm landslide, but after 2018, my expectations are lower - maybe one Chamber. Not that that wouldn't help. Edited Sunday at 11:45 PM by gehringer_2 Quote
Motown Bombers Posted Sunday at 11:52 PM Posted Sunday at 11:52 PM 3 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: Sure -there is always hope for a midterm landslide, but after 2018, my expectations are lower - maybe one Chamber. Not that that wouldn't help. What? 2018 was a blue wave. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Monday at 12:00 AM Posted Monday at 12:00 AM (edited) 8 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: What? 2018 was a blue wave. wasn't nearly what I was looking for. No fundamental re-alignment. Blue's ambitions have been beaten down so far they consider one chamber in 2018 a big wave? One chamber in the off year is more like a ripple on the body politic. Edited Monday at 12:01 AM by gehringer_2 1 Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted Monday at 01:20 PM Posted Monday at 01:20 PM 13 hours ago, GalagaGuy said: I wish people would stop with the narrative that after Biden took office, Garland spent 6 months going through the Epstein case and reported the findings to Biden or something. We have no reason to believe it was given any attention at all during Biden's term. Garland barely got started investigating Trump and all the alleged crimes and conspiracies he was involved in, let alone Epstein. The appointment of Merrick Garland was Biden's worst appointment IMO. He dropped the ball and was late to the game on so many things. 2 Quote
Edman85 Posted Monday at 02:18 PM Posted Monday at 02:18 PM 14 hours ago, Motown Bombers said: What? 2018 was a blue wave. Tell that to Claire McCaskill, Bill Nelson, Joe Donnelly, and Heidi Heitkamp. Quote
RatkoVarda Posted Monday at 10:04 PM Posted Monday at 10:04 PM lapdog Trump doing what his Chinese owners tell him to do; here's why that's bad new for Obama Quote
chasfh Posted Monday at 10:54 PM Posted Monday at 10:54 PM That's really embarrassing, like, world-stage embarrassing. As is this: Quote
RatkoVarda Posted Tuesday at 04:23 PM Posted Tuesday at 04:23 PM looks like the jail house video - which Bill Barr said did not exist -but Patel and Bondi released - with a minute missing - now has a new version without the minute missing, so all the conspiracy people will now be satisfied. LOL Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted Tuesday at 04:35 PM Posted Tuesday at 04:35 PM Trump and the sycophants around him have been gaslighting you for years Joe, on literally every issue and news topic under the sun. Only now, on the Epstein case, does Rogan realize he's being gaslit? He's either been in on the gaslighting the entire time himself and just can't stick around now that it involves a sexual predator or he's really just that dumb and never figured it out. For a guy that has to talk as much as he does as a podcast host, how can you possibly be this dumb? Quote
slothfacekilla Posted Tuesday at 05:10 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:10 PM I don't think it is too deep, Rogan is a dumbass grifter and always has been Quote
Tigermojo Posted Tuesday at 05:19 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:19 PM I wonder if Joe Rogan is having Fear Factor flashbacks. He's just now realizing he's in bed with a snake. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Tuesday at 05:30 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:30 PM 18 minutes ago, slothfacekilla said: I don't think it is too deep, Rogan is a dumbass grifter and always has been yeah - for every media technology from the soap box to the radio to the TV to the net, there are people whose presentation style is a good enough fit that the value of what they say doesn't correlate in any meaningful way to their success. Quote
Tiger337 Posted Tuesday at 05:33 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:33 PM 2 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: yeah - for every media technology from the soap box to the radio to the TV to the net, there are people whose presentation style is a good enough fit that the value of what they say doesn't correlate in any meaningful way to their success. Kind of like politicians! 1 Quote
oblong Posted Tuesday at 05:41 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:41 PM Bongino had some "cryptic" statement the other day about things he's seen that would "blow you away" and I interpreted that to be a way to walk back his hard line stance and fend off the wolves until they forget about it. "Just wait until I tell you about what I see...." Then in 2-3 years nobody remembers. Quote
mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 07:04 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:04 PM 2 hours ago, Motown Bombers said: Quote
mtutiger Posted Tuesday at 07:07 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:07 PM (edited) Edited Tuesday at 07:07 PM by mtutiger Quote
Tiger337 Posted Tuesday at 09:26 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:26 PM (edited) How does one steal an employee? Did Trump own that girl and Epstein stole her? What the ****? Edited Tuesday at 09:27 PM by Tiger337 Quote
Archie Posted yesterday at 12:48 AM Posted yesterday at 12:48 AM 3 hours ago, Tiger337 said: How does one steal an employee? Did Trump own that girl and Epstein stole her? What the ****? When a business hires someone from some other business, usually a competitor, for more money its considered stealing an employee. It happens everyday. The Epstein case documents has been around for a long time including when Biden was in office. Does anyone really think if Trump was on any client list that someone from the Biden Admin wouldn't have released that info to the world? I'm sure they would have and every MSM channel would have broadcast it for months. 2 Quote
Tiger337 Posted yesterday at 01:02 AM Posted yesterday at 01:02 AM (edited) 26 minutes ago, Archie said: When a business hires someone from some other business, usually a competitor, for more money its considered stealing an employee. It happens everyday. The Epstein case documents has been around for a long time including when Biden was in office. Does anyone really think if Trump was on any client list that someone from the Biden Admin wouldn't have released that info to the world? I'm sure they would have and every MSM channel would have broadcast it for months. Businesses can call it what they want. Nobody owns anyone. If a person wants to work at a different company, they are free to do so. Not defeding either one of those POS, so don't go there. Hearing grown men talking about about stealing underaged girls from each other is disgraceful to say the least. Hearing you defend it is also sickening. yes, I do believe that Trump is on the list. Everything about his past history and the way he is currently behaving points to him being on the list. Why hasn't it been released? Because there are likely numerous wealthy and powerful people connected to both parties on the list. Edited yesterday at 01:15 AM by Tiger337 2 Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted yesterday at 01:16 AM Posted yesterday at 01:16 AM Do I think there is a definitive client list with names of every time someone visited Epstein Island? Maybe, but I don't feel 100% certain that there is. Did the Trump Administration's Attorney General Pam Bondi definitively state there was a client list that was sitting on her desk to be reviewed? Yes. If there is an Epstein client list, do I think the guy that is alleged to have walked in on underage, teenage girls getting changed at a Miss Teen USA beauty pageant is on that list? 100% I think he would be on the Epstein client list. Quote
Archie Posted yesterday at 01:18 AM Posted yesterday at 01:18 AM 15 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: Businesses can call it what they want. Nobody owns anyone. If a person wants to work at a different company, they are free to do so. Not defeding either one of those POS, so don't go there. Hearing grown men talking about about stealing underaged girls from each other is disgraceful to say the least. Hearing you defend it is also sickening. yes, I do believe that Trump is on the list. Everything about his past history and the way he is currently behaving points to him being on the list. Why hasn't it been released? Because there are likely numerous wealthy and powerful people connected to both parties on the list. Why do you think Biden and the dems wouldn't have released that information? If they did I'm pretty sure that Trump wouldn't be POTUS today. They fabricated other stuff so why not use actual factual information to get rid of Trump? 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.