Sports_Freak Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 5 minutes ago, RaceDog said: 4 years and 240 million? Great for baseball they say 😞 What?? $60 million per? Wow, if Skubal has another Cy-like season, his price just went up. Holy cow... Quote
GalagaGuy Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Absolutely absurd for MLB to go another day without a salary cap. 1 Quote
Motor City Sonics Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago (edited) Blow it up, man. That upcoming CBA has to change things. This is ridiculous. If it means losing a season, then do it. This is crazy. Edited 9 hours ago by Motor City Sonics Quote
Tigermojo Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) There has to be major deferrals. He's a 4 WAR player. $30 million deferred but it doesn't say how much per year. Edited 9 hours ago by Tigermojo Quote
Tiger337 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 55 minutes ago, Motor City Sonics said: Blow it up, man. That upcoming CBA has to change things. This is ridiculous. If it means losing a season, then do it. This is crazy. No way do I want to lose a season. I am too old for that. It's going to to be fun meeting the Dodgers in the World Series some year and beating them. Edited 8 hours ago by Tiger337 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 38 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: No way do I want to lose a season. I am too old for that. It's going to to be fun meeting the Dodgers in the World Series some year and beating them. Once the Dodgers sign Skubal at the end of the season, they'll have more AAV to 3 players:Tucker, Ohtani and Skubal; than the total payroll of maybe 20 teams. Edited 8 hours ago by gehringer_2 Quote
buddha Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago i cant wait until baseball gets a salary cap so we can all try to figure out if the dodgers are over the second apron so they can use their mid level exception or if they have to trade a $6.7 million trade exception to tampa for the rights to a player they will cut in order to create a third exception to retain a 4th players rights. salary caps are stupid. they will remain stupid no matter what team is throwing stupid money after 30+ year old declining corner outfielders. 1 Quote
casimir Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago That's $240M less for the Dodgers to spend o. Skubal. Quote
4hzglory Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 hours ago, papalawrence said: Tucker to get 4/240. He can opt out after years 2 or 3. The Mets supposed offer of 3/150 was "just a bit outside." Now the say the Mets offered 4/220 with no deferrals, $120 mil pd first 2 years with opt outs after 2 and 3. Quote
chasfh Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago The players are telling us that at this time, they want money now over years later. No one knows whether they’ll be earning any income next year at all, and beyond that, what anything will look like under the new CBA. Quote
Motor City Sonics Posted 41 minutes ago Author Posted 41 minutes ago (edited) Tucker is a really good player, but according to baseball reference...........60 mil a year for this? It can't continue. There has to be something in place to stop this - because it's just going to be 2 or 3 teams buying every good player all the time. Works now for the Dodgers, but not yet for the Mets. It's just out of hand. If this guy is 60 million per year, then Skubal is 70 or 75. It's not just that they will just keep buying players, but it throws the salaries for everyone else into chaos and you'll get bench guys making 25 million a year. The basis of your business is supposed to be competition, but it doesn't really exist for 3/4 of your teams. They might be good enough to squeak by in their division or grab a wild card spot, but not much of anything else. Burn it down. Edited 40 minutes ago by Motor City Sonics Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.