Jump to content

2023 NBA Trade Deadline


Deleterious

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, RatkoVarda said:

Hollinger certainly knows more about the NBA than me, but Wiseman is 21 (!) and has played 3, 39, 0, and 21 games his last for years. Lots of guys never really get better, but the idea that the cake is baked at 21 always bothers me. (Grant Hill was at Duke at 21.)  If you are going to have teenagers in the NBA, you have to find some patience which Det can offer.

that's a good point.  i agree with you.  wiseman obviously has upside that some (including me) are probably discounting because he's been so bad at every level so far.  and honestly, its not like im watching his games.

but i think this is the same situation with bagley and okafor (even bol bol).  its weaver's obsession with big men in a time when big men are being de-emphasized in the game.  

and you already have one with upside.  why do you need three?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, buddha said:

... and you already have one with upside.  why do you need three?

Wiseman's upside is higher than Bagley's or Stew's, that's why. He's more athletic, and a much higher offensive threat.

Prediction: Wiseman becomes the best 3-point shooter of these 4 bigs, and averages 35% (not this year and maybe not next year... but starting from age 23 through 33-ish...).

His floor time will be dependent on his defense though. Which apparently sucks bigly.

But I think he becomes a better defender than Bagley (not hard), and gets up to a tad below Duren (what Duren will become). Not elite... but more like a Turner in that he's a shot-blocker but not a great one-on-one defender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deleterious said:

Which...

MIGHT be cured with playing time.

Since it was close to zero with GS... how was he supposed to improve?

The Pistons can have him come off the bench and live with all his mistakes while they try to coach him up.

No guarantee it works but... Detroit's in a great spot to give him the chance/ playing time to try and get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said:

Wiseman's upside is higher than Bagley's or Stew's, that's why. He's more athletic, and a much higher offensive threat.

Prediction: Wiseman becomes the best 3-point shooter of these 4 bigs, and averages 35% (not this year and maybe not next year... but starting from age 23 through 33-ish...).

His floor time will be dependent on his defense though. Which apparently sucks bigly.

But I think he becomes a better defender than Bagley (not hard), and gets up to a tad below Duren (what Duren will become). Not elite... but more like a Turner in that he's a shot-blocker but not a great one-on-one defender.

Wiseman has (had?) a lot more potential than Duren. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deleterious said:

Wiseman has (had?) a lot more potential than Duren. 

I hedged on that because of the past few years...

And on the defensive end, I'm not so certain about that. On O, yes... but big picture...

he's got a lot to prove...

and a long ways to improve. 

Room for growth... but the growth curve is steep for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, RandyMarsh said:

Regardless what you think of the trade one good thing is it gives us another player to focus on and hope plays well the rest of the way. We already knew what Bey was so there was no tuning into see him but we now have Ivey, Duren and Wiseman to keep tabs and watch. 

That's the lone positive I see from this as well. We knew what we were getting in Bey and it wasn't fun to watch in the least. At least with Wiseman it's something new to keep an eye on because otherwise, I was running out of reasons to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, buddha said:

and traded a lot of assets to get there.  now, the assets might not have been all that valuable, but they were assets.

 

This is the one thing I'd give Weaver a pass on and more patience is required, because he was handed a pile of dung when he got here 3 years ago.

People point to OKC, Houston, Orlando, Utah and San Antonio having this "treasure chest" of future 1sts while the Pistons have jack. Well, the Pistons didn't have George, Westbrook when he was good, CP3, Harden, Vucevic, Gordon, Mitchell, Gobert and Murray to sell off, he had broken Griffin and Rose, so no shit that those franchises have all these extra 1sts to work with.

What I can't forgive Weaver is what has now turned out to be a disastrous 2020 draft. You can't have three top 18 picks (and give up assets to get the last two) and end up with a bench big, a barely NBA caliber PG and a reclamation project in Wiseman. Getting no surefire starters 3 years after the drafting 3 guys in the 1st is a massive fail and has set this thing back. Now we wait on Cade to be healthy (concerning since he's had multiple injuries in his first 2 years), Ivey and Duren to develop, lottery luck and for this or the next coach to develop somebody/anybody who isn't a very high draft pick. I'm still on board with this process but Weaver needs to start making some hay starting this offseason.

Edited by NYLion
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, NYLion said:

... What I can't forgive Weaver is what has now turned out to be a disastrous 2020 draft. You can't have three top 18 picks (and give up assets to get the last two) and end up with ... a barely NBA caliber PG and ...

How much criticism does Weaver get for not correctly identifying Haliburton versus Killian? 

But also... how many in here were higher on Haliburton versus Killian?

I don't remember...

I think I was higher on Hali but I wasn't vocal about it at all. It was probably marginal at best... and at that point for me it was "trust in Weaver" anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I remember of the 2020 draft I think most saw Edwards as the only potential star and even he wasnt a sure thing by many due to his shooting numbers in the SEC.

I think Del was always down on Killian but I think aside from him most on here were fine with the pick. I think the consensus was that Hali may have been the safer pick but Hayes had more upside but I could be wrong about that. 

Edited by RandyMarsh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

46 minutes ago, NYLion said:

This is the one thing I'd give Weaver a pass on and more patience is required, because he was handed a pile of dung when he got here 3 years ago.

People point to OKC, Houston, Orlando, Utah and San Antonio having this "treasure chest" of future 1sts while the Pistons have jack. Well, the Pistons didn't have George, Westbrook when he was good, CP3, Harden, Vucevic, Gordon, Mitchell, Gobert and Murray to sell off, he had broken Griffin and Rose, so no shit that those franchises have all these extra 1sts to work with.

What I can't forgive Weaver is what has now turned out to be a disastrous 2020 draft. You can't have three top 18 picks (and give up assets to get the last two) and end up with a bench big, a barely NBA caliber PG and a reclamation project in Wiseman. Getting no surefire starters 3 years after the drafting 3 guys in the 1st is a massive fail and has set this thing back. Now we wait on Cade to be healthy (concerning since he's had multiple injuries in his first 2 years), Ivey and Duren to develop, lottery luck and for this or the next coach to develop somebody/anybody who isn't a very high draft pick. I'm still on board with this process but Weaver needs to start making some hay starting this offseason.

Weaver started with a pile shit.  Three years later and he’s turned it into a younger pile of shit.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Hongbit said:

 

Weaver started with a pile shit.  Three years later and he’s turned it into a younger pile of shit.   

That's fair although I wouldn't call Cade, Ivey and Duren piles of shit, they're just.... young. I'd take that over the Griffin, Rose, Drummond, Jackson core that was on a one way treadmill to nowhere.

My main point is, compared to the other rebuilding teams, he had garbage assets to work with to build a foundation while those others teams all had stars that they could sell off for multiple 1sts.

Edited by NYLion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said:

How much criticism does Weaver get for not correctly identifying Haliburton versus Killian? 

But also... how many in here were higher on Haliburton versus Killian?

I don't remember...

I think I was higher on Hali but I wasn't vocal about it at all. It was probably marginal at best... and at that point for me it was "trust in Weaver" anyways.

It also is not your job to chose Haliburton over Hayes.  It's Weaver's job and he should be judged on it.  

At the end of the day, I don't judge him too harshly on one bad first round pick in three years (out of 6 total).  The jury is still very much out on Ivey, Cade, and Duren and time will tell.  I am fairly confident Duren will turn out to be a really good pick-up at 13 overall.  

Results do matter though and the results the Pistons are getting are putrid.  Which is why next year is crucial in evaluating his performance.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All excuses and qualifiers aside, Cade has been a huge disappointment so far.    Ivey has not looked bad but I’m not sure he’s got star potential.   Duren has been great for a young center drafted outside the lottery but I’m not sure how valuable that is in the long run.  Now we add  Wiseman to the mix who has looks like Bagley 2.0.    Not saying this cant turn into something but that’s based more on hope, dreams, and wishes than any solid foundation.  

Please save us, Vic!  

Edited by Hongbit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...