Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Tanner Bibee has 35 strikeouts in 51 innings.  And, he has given up 11 home runs.  Why, that's even more than Jack Flaherty!  He is going to get pummeled. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jim Cowan said:

Tanner Bibee has 35 strikeouts in 51 innings.  And, he has given up 11 home runs.  Why, that's even more than Jack Flaherty!  He is going to get pummeled. 

Nice. Hopefully he’s not “due“ to redress this imbalance. And all this stuff about things being “due“ or “not due“ mean nothing because you just have to play the game. if there’s anything this Tigers team does, it’s block out everything and focus only on the game at hand. 

Posted

When this team returns to “full force,” and it’s hard to tell when or if injuries will hurl it below that threshold once again, some tough decisions will be made. Who gets edged out, or moved to where in the field? I guess it’s a nice problem to have but it’s a problem nonetheless. How many centerfielders and infielders (excluding 1st) does this team have room for?

Posted
19 minutes ago, IdahoBert said:

When this team returns to “full force,” and it’s hard to tell when or if injuries will hurl it below that threshold once again, some tough decisions will be made. Who gets edged out, or moved to where in the field? I guess it’s a nice problem to have but it’s a problem nonetheless. How many centerfielders and infielders (excluding 1st) does this team have room for?

Badoo and Malloy out for Verling and Meadows I guess 

Posted
39 minutes ago, SoCalTiger said:

Badoo and Malloy out for Verling and Meadows I guess 

That was/is my guess too. With W. Perez to stay in Toledo. Hinch loves moving guys around and Vierling really adds to his moves. Javy to 3rd base and at SS with tough lefties on the mound.

Posted
48 minutes ago, IdahoBert said:

When this team returns to “full force,” and it’s hard to tell when or if injuries will hurl it below that threshold once again, some tough decisions will be made. Who gets edged out, or moved to where in the field? I guess it’s a nice problem to have but it’s a problem nonetheless. How many centerfielders and infielders (excluding 1st) does this team have room for?

Realistically, no team is really ever full force this day and age. Gone are the days of 3 SP's pitching 200 innings on a team and 7-8 position players starting 150+ games per year. Just simply the facts that take many of us who have followed the game for awhile (myself included) - a bit of time to come to this realization.

It is good to have a lot of depth. Organizations are now much more aware of this.

What baseball could do, to help alleviate some of the injuries? IMHO, is to have a few less games, maybe 28 man rosters, scheduled by-weekend ends a couple times each year for every team (not no baseball played, just different teams getting a weekend off, like what football does) and maybe a couple other things. Yes, it is about money from the viewpoint of some, but people want to see the star players 'play'. 

Maximum efforts, especially with Ps, requires optimum recovery time. Athletes are only as good and consistent as the allotted recovery time will allow. Actual rest and nutrition are also factors. The trainers are much more versed on these things now - but the actual time off is still 'not' there IMHO.

How could the players of yesteryear do it? I suspect one reason was that their bodies were not in the same peak physical condition as many of the players of today are. A well peaked physical player (strength, speed, nutrition, etc.) that plays 5 days in a row is simply putting more demand on the body than a player of 25, 40+ years ago - that was not in the same physical condition. I am 'not' saying the players did not play hard years ago and many were great players.  I am saying today the players are more and are more precise with their conditioning and peaking their skills by means of greater knowledge of physiology and use of certain technologies. Their body fat is also lower. They are simply 'overall' expending more energy with the games and conditioning than the players of before ever did.

IMHO, that is 'part' of it.

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, alex said:

Realistically, no team is really ever full force this day and age. 

Good post, by “full force” what I meant was having back the guys who haven’t even played yet this year, who came down with injuries in spring training. I’m not expecting to have 9 guys who play 150+ games a year. 

Posted

Are the teams even "gritty" this year? To me, that indicates a team that grinds out close wins, outperforming their talent. Not sure that's the case given the strong starting rotation, the tons of runs they're scoring, and the number of games they've won decisively. I'm not saying they're going to win 107 games, but I think 95 is a solid target right now. 

Posted
1 hour ago, lordstanley said:

Are the teams even "gritty" this year? To me, that indicates a team that grinds out close wins, outperforming their talent. Not sure that's the case given the strong starting rotation, the tons of runs they're scoring, and the number of games they've won decisively. I'm not saying they're going to win 107 games, but I think 95 is a solid target right now. 

That means a 62-50 record in the last 112 games. Very possible. Maybe better if they stay healthy?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...