Jump to content

Religion


Tigermojo

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mtutiger said:

 

PS: And I don't see how the Palestinians can trust Putin either.

Aside from transactional that is...

I mean, he already F'd the Armenians. Not to mention Ukraine (their "Slavic cousins"...)

And he's made several veiled threats against Byelorussia and Kazakhstan as well...

 

 

Edited by 1984Echoes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mtutiger said:

I, personally, would love to see anyone make the argument to a room of politicians (GOP and Dem) that Israel shouldn't get any funding because, don't worry, the war machine always gets theirs....

They would (with good reason) be laughed and/or jeered out of the room. Because it is a specious and unserious argument that isn't founded in anything concrete. 

And the same would hold true with Ukraine as well.... if Congresscritters want to vote to cut off aid, they should be made to own that decision, not covered by unserious arguments that hinge on throwaway lines about "the war machine" and whatnot.

This more than anything.

Does no one remember "Iran-Contra" anymore, btw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said:

PS: And I don't see how the Palestinians can trust Putin either.

Aside from transactional that is...

I mean, he already F'd the Armenians. Not to mention Ukraine (their "Slavic cousins"...)

And he's made several veiled threats against Byelorussia and Kazakhstan as well...

 

 

Putin is all for running around starting or stoking as many fires as possible right now.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

Stan wasn't going off of actual roll call votes in the House whenever he made claims about anything.

At the time the 'defund the police' talk was loud and we were seeing protests and riots in the streets, folks like Stan absolutely feared that the democrats would eventually make those votes to defund the police.  Ultimately, and probably through an Omnibus, nothing changed and now the right wing talk is 'well, they would like too' vs 'they are going to do it'.  It'll never happen though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Motor City Sonics said:

Ah yes, organized religion is just so wonderful.    Making one side hate another side because their version of an invisible entity doesn't line up with the other's version of an invisible entity.         People who grew up blocks from each other.    It would be like Dearborn and Melvindale being in a perpetual war.   

My (man-made created origin story so absolutely NOT REAL) god doesn't like your (man-made created origin story so absolutely NOT REAL) god...

So I must EXTERMINATE you!!! Pogrom (Christians murdering Jews)! Inquisition (Christians murdering Jews)! Holocaust (Christians murdering Jews)! Crusades (Christians murdering Muslims)! Pakistani independence (Hindi & Muslim murdering each other)! Jews are in Palestine (Israel) - (Muslims murdering Jews)!

Absolutely grotesque behavior.

All over something that doesn't even exist except within peoples' heads...

Despicable.

Can we just wipe this scourge (religion) off the map? It no longer exists (please, please, please).

The world would be a better place. IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Putin is all for running around starting or stoking as many fires as possible right now.

Correct.... and I wish it were easier for some to see both what is happening in Israel and Ukraine in that broader context versus just playing one off the other (ie. Josh Hawley's statement)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ewsieg said:

At the time the 'defund the police' talk was loud and we were seeing protests and riots in the streets, folks like Stan absolutely feared that the democrats would eventually make those votes to defund the police.  Ultimately, and probably through an Omnibus, nothing changed and now the right wing talk is 'well, they would like too' vs 'they are going to do it'.  It'll never happen though.

OK.

Still would assume that GOP members of Congress who voted to defund Ukraine are proud of their votes and should be able to stand behind it, rather than being excused for it for nebulous reasons.

Edited by mtutiger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a big assumption that people wouldn't be just as good at finding other reasons to kill each other in the absence of organized religions - genocides by Stalin, the Khmer Rouge, Rawanda come to mind.  Even the Holocaust, while it was directed at a religious group, was not a religious imperative of German Lutheranism. Religion often becomes the stalking horse to dress up more fundamental aims of conquest, greed, land, ethnicity. Still, if conquest were made a harder sell without the availability of the gloss of God's consent, that might be progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said:

It's a big assumption that people wouldn't be just as good at finding other reasons to kill each other in the absence of organized religions - genocides by Stalin, the Khmer Rouge, Rawanda come to mind.  Even the Holocaust, while it was directed at a religious group, was not a religious imperative of German Lutheranism. Religion often becomes the stalking horse to dress up more fundamental aims of conquest, greed, land, ethnicity. Still, if conquest were made a harder sell without the availability of the gloss of God's consent, that might be progress.

I agree that not all internecine violence would be wiped out were religion also wiped out, but it's at least a debatable proposition that the world would be a better place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

It's a big assumption that people wouldn't be just as good at finding other reasons to kill each other in the absence of organized religions - genocides by Stalin, the Khmer Rouge, Rawanda come to mind.  Even the Holocaust, while it was directed at a religious group, was not a religious imperative of German Lutheranism. Religion often becomes the stalking horse to dress up more fundamental aims of conquest, greed, land, ethnicity. Still, if conquest were made a harder sell without the availability of the gloss of God's consent, that might be progress.

Oh absolutely,  "for God and country" is a good way to stir up the unwashed but conflict is always about land or water or gold or other economic resources.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jim Cowan said:

Oh absolutely,  "for God and country" is a good way to stir up the unwashed but conflict is always about land or water or gold or other economic resources.  

I wonder whether God and country is a harder sell now that belief in religion and even God has waned over the centuries. Centuries ago, life for the masses was such a slog that dying in a war to ensure a spot in heaven might have seemed like a pretty sweet deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chasfh said:

life for the masses was such a slog that dying in a war to ensure a spot in heaven might have seemed like a pretty sweet deal.

This is still working pretty well for Putin in asiatic Russia but now it's a car for the wife once you're dead.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious question, what's the real difference between Bibi Netanyahu and Putin from a governance and philosophical standpoint? It seems to me that both are corrupt, far right, authoritarians. The difference to me seems that Putin has coalesced power in a way that Bibi has not yet. But I have no doubt in my mind that if Bibi could have the level of power and control that Putin does he'd take it in an instant.

Edited by Mr.TaterSalad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said:

Serious question, what's the real difference between Bibi Netanyahu and Putin from a governance and philosophical standpoint? It seems to me that both are corrupt, far right, authoritarians. The difference to me seems that Putin has coalesced power in a way that Bibi has not yet. But I have no doubt in my mind that if Bibi could have the level of power and control that Putin does he'd take it in an instant.

Bibi got caught with his corruption.

Putin hasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...