SoCalTiger Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 3 hours ago, Toddwert said: Isn’t Crews what you hope Clark turns into? Yes I want Crews but if Harris gets cute to save $ and avoid Boras is it a disaster ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 2 hours ago, RandyMarsh said: I have read more than one report that says that Clark and Jenkins may have the highest upside of any players in the draft and I believe it was Law who said if he had to pick one player from the class to win multiple MVPs it would be Clark Who do you project to have the better career right now: The college record breaker (Torkelson) or the prep pick (Greene)? I don't have a problem picking a prep player that conventional wisdom ranks below the top college players because conventional wisdom is always going to rank college players higher because they have played more, are more familiar, have more counting stats to look at and compare. But if you really trust your scouting.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalTiger Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 And if Harris feels we are three plus years from contending and wants to stretch the draft booty Clark comes into play. The problem with drafting Crews at 3 is Boras will want number one $$ and that limits the budget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatkoVarda Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Crews is not going back to college and not going to the USFL; draft him 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalTiger Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 We will soon know !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KL2 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 53 minutes ago, SoCalTiger said: And if Harris feels we are three plus years from contending and wants to stretch the draft booty Clark comes into play. The problem with drafting Crews at 3 is Boras will want number one $$ and that limits the budget. That;s a long played out misnomer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 LOL, Manfred gets booed every time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongLiveMaroth Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Skenes went #1 we will get either Crews or Langford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordstanley Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Skenes to the Pirates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1984Echoes Posted July 9, 2023 Author Share Posted July 9, 2023 Well that makes it easy for us... Thank you Pirates!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious D Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Langford looking likely. I’m good with that, if it plays out this way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger337 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 I am happy the Tigers are getting a hitter. Either Langford or Crews is fine with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hongbit Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 (edited) Nice job by ESPN to spoil the #1 pick by putting it on the ticker 2 minutes before the actual announcement. Edited July 9, 2023 by Hongbit 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oblong Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 1 minute ago, Hongbit said: Nice job by ESPN to spoil the #1 pick by putting it on the ticker 2 minutes before the actual announcement. They did something similar for the NHL draft lottery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1984Echoes Posted July 9, 2023 Author Share Posted July 9, 2023 And the Nationals take the Boras issue out of our hands... Langford or BUST!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 well, it's not gonna be Crews Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalTiger Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Looks good for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamakzie Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Langford is there for us to take. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious D Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Please be Langford. Don’t screw this up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious D Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Anybody have any deja vu just now? 2021 draft? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordstanley Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Just now, 1984Echoes said: And the Nationals take the Boras issue out of our hands... Langford or BUST!!! Yeah I was i wanting Crews by slight margin but I’m now less nervous about skipping down to Jenkins or Clark at #3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatkoVarda Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 WTF! Jackson Jobe? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyMarsh Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Unbelievable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gehringer_2 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 PREP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordstanley Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Oh for god’s sake. Clark, boo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.