Jump to content

Where Do Things End With Vlad? (h/t romad1)


chasfh

Recommended Posts

reports that a US B-52 with Polish figher escorts "toured" the Gulf of Finland today - virtually on the Russian border. I wonder if a part of this is NATO is saying to Russia - "You can make a 100% resource commitment to your operations in Ukraine but there is no free lunch -  it's going to cost you not being able to respond to who knows what we might be up to on your borders. Have a nice day Ivan."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wagner opening up recruitment centers around Russia. How stable can a country be with growing private army running around? Maybe we shouldn't discount that one way this war ends for the Ukrainians is when Prigozhin's Wagner and Putin's MOD break into open warfare with each other to control the country. Sort of a repeat of the Russian exit  from WWI?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

Wagner opening up recruitment centers around Russia. How stable can a country be with growing private army running around? Maybe we shouldn't discount that one way this war ends for the Ukrainians is when Prigozhin's Wagner and Putin's MOD break into open warfare with each other to control the country. Sort of a repeat of the Russian exit  from WWI?

That's really interesting.  Yes, they have done it before.

As always though, be careful what you wish for.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, as an airpower guy... I would love to see what would happen if the "vaunted" VVS were to face competent NATO air forces.   However, we know it would be precursor to WWIII so I actually don't want to see that.   But, damn Russia has shown nothing but its ass in this war in anything requiring training hours or the management of resources.  Its almost as if you can't run a war with a Potemkin military. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, romad1 said:

Now, as an airpower guy... I would love to see what would happen if the "vaunted" VVS were to face competent NATO air forces.   However, we know it would be precursor to WWIII so I actually don't want to see that.   But, damn Russia has shown nothing but its ass in this war in anything requiring training hours or the management of resources.  Its almost as if you can't run a war with a Potemkin military. 

They should have focused earlier on taking out the power grid. 
 

but what’s the end game for both sides. Neither side is going to get everything they want. But western media keeps perpetuating this idea Ukraine is going to have some huge massive breakthrough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, digitalpigsmuggler said:

They should have focused earlier on taking out the power grid. 
 

but what’s the end game for both sides. Neither side is going to get everything they want. But western media keeps perpetuating this idea Ukraine is going to have some huge massive breakthrough. 

We'll see in the next few months where the capabilities of each side actually stand. Russia has thrown everything they have and fundamentally have not moved the line. Ukraine has withstood all that so far and is still building capability - enough to force the Russians to sue for peace on their terms? Unknown, but I think we can be pretty certain they are going to try before the year is out. Then final outcome likelihoods will become clearer.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

We'll see in the next few months where the capabilities of each side actually stand. Russia has thrown everything they have and fundamentally have not moved the line. Ukraine has withstood all that so far and is still building capability - enough to force the Russians to sue for peace on their terms? Unknown, but I think we can be pretty certain they are going to try before the year is out. Then final outcome likelihoods will become clearer.

Wasn’t the media making a big to do about Ukraine not having enough shells. If that’s accurate going to be hard to launch offensive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Jim Cowan said:

Russia was supposed to have a huge strategic advantage in the winter.  Europe would be freezing in the dark without Russian energy, and support for Ukraine would disappear as a result.  It didn't happen.

When the townspeople unify they can stand up to the bully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said:

They are.

Well, actual professionals are resourcing the program.  They have actual information and are coordinating it across a nation that has motive beyond measure.   Meanwhile, who in Russia has really suffered except those conscripted? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

In a 2012 article in the American Journalism Review, former foreign desk editor Tom O'Hara contended that coverage was skewed to favor the agenda of the government of the United Arab Emirates. He said that the newspaper had a "meticulous censorship process" that directly influenced coverage and word usage in the newspaper, such as prohibiting use of the term "Persian Gulf". He said that the newspaper engaged in self-censorship, suppressing coverage of subjects deemed to cast an unfavorable light on the UAE royal family and government. He said that, among other things, coverage of the Libyan uprising was suppressed, as were articles about WikiLeaks and gay rights.[17]

The New Republic reported in February 2013 that The National had failed to live up to high expectations that had been raised when it was established. The magazine said that the newsroom has had a series of crises during the preceding five years, and that "tensions over the management and direction of the paper have been simmering behind the scenes, with leadership changes, budget cuts, infighting and allegations of rampant self-censorship conspiring to trigger a series of defections that have depleted the paper of much of its marquee talent". The article described examples of rampant self-censorship, and said the newspaper's story was "a cautionary tale about pursuing journalism in a censored society".[11

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_(Abu_Dhabi)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Jim Cowan said:

Russia was supposed to have a huge strategic advantage in the winter.  Europe would be freezing in the dark without Russian energy, and support for Ukraine would disappear as a result.  It didn't happen.

Europe had a very warm winter, at one point it was the warmest on record, I'm not sure how that finished out.  Regardless they got a bit lucky, which I'll take.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...