Jump to content

Gun Legislation, Crime, and Events


Tigerbomb13

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, chasfh said:

And here we are debating the etiquette of how two openly-armed shooters in a civil setting should respond to each other.

Ain’t that America.

Yup, right now that is America.  I'm not disagreeing there is a problem.  I just don't think putting the non-aggressor, who didn't try and stand his ground (which isn't allowed in Wisconsin), but rather attempted to flee first, in jail just because you feel guns are bad is the right solution.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ewsieg said:

Yup, right now that is America.  I'm not disagreeing there is a problem.  I just don't think putting the non-aggressor, who didn't try and stand his ground (which isn't allowed in Wisconsin), but rather attempted to flee first, in jail just because you feel guns are bad is the right solution.  

c9LM1mOf.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oblong said:

BLM should invite him to a rally... let's see what happens.

A theory I saw is Kyle's lawyer had him for 6 months and coached him on what to say... which didn't line up with MAGA. We'll see where he goes from here.

 

I am not too surprised that a 17-year-old kid would keep changing is story.  Wasn't he originally there to provide medical assistance?  He seems confused and impressionable like many his age.  I am more concerned about a system which allows a kid like that to carry a gun and a society that views him as a hero.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chasfh said:

This is what I am wondering, too. How convenient it is for RW narrative. I can’t believe Tucker had no idea he was going to say it.

Well, the BLM ain’t having any of it.

 

Black lives matter is a terrorist organization.  Everyone can see that by their rhetoric about killing police.  Their comment on Rittenhouse is laughable especially coming from them.  They spew enough hate and violence to last a lifetime.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chasfh said:

Sure, they’re not a blank slate when first dive into Facebook, Twitter, and all the right-wing social apps. They’re definitely primed beforehand. I just don’t think it’s conversation over Thanksgiving dinner that’s radicalizing tens of millions of people into believing the election was stolen from Trump and that civil war is the only way to remedy it.

It doesn't happen in a dinner conversation.  It builds up over a lifetime.  These people have never trusted our government and they have received confirmation.  I think they always believed these things, but were afraid to say it and felt powerless to do anything about it until Trump.  Social media does allow them to connect with like thinking people more easily.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

It doesn't happen in a dinner conversation.  It builds up over a lifetime.  These people have never trusted our government and they have received confirmation.  I think they always believed these things, but were afraid to say it and felt powerless to do anything about it until Trump.  Social media does allow them to connect with like thinking people more easily.    

Sucks you lived a sad powerless life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

It doesn't happen in a dinner conversation.  It builds up over a lifetime.  These people have never trusted our government and they have received confirmation.  I think they always believed these things, but were afraid to say it and felt powerless to do anything about it until Trump.  Social media does allow them to connect with like thinking people more easily.    

I agree that it doesn't happen in a dinner conversation. I agree that they were already distrustful of the government. I would disagree with the notion that practically all were already radicalized before social media, or that social media had little if any effect on them. I believe social media was used purposefully to radicalize a great number of people otherwise quiet about their previously pushed-down beliefs, and that Trump was a key utilizer of that strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ewsieg said:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/rittenhouse-tells-fox-news-racist-person-backs-blm-81344259

Uh-oh, Rittenhouse is flipping the script on the narrative.  With a good PR firm, a year from now, instead of CPAC, he might be leading BLM rallies, with BLM allies noting he killed 2 white people that were sabotaging their peaceful protests, as the right calls him a socialist.

As cynical as people are about Rittenhouse's appearance on Tucker, he's still an 18 year old who probably doesn't have fully formulated views on a lot of these issues. In a country where the voting populace tends to have much more mixed views on the issues than is portrayed in the media. So in that sense, maybe it shouldn't be surprising if he's more sympathetic to BLM than people realize.

Edited by mtutiger
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I agree that it doesn't happen in a dinner conversation. I agree that they were already distrustful of the government. I would disagree with the notion that practically all were already radicalized before social media, or that social media had little if any effect on them. I believe social media was used purposefully to radicalize a great number of people otherwise quiet about their previously pushed-down beliefs, and that Trump was a key utilizer of that strategy.

Y'all need to get laid more and drink more booze if you are discussing politics over dinner. 

Edited by Triggerwarning
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Triggerwarning said:

Clearly running away. 

Not "clearly running away".

Looked to me like he was running toward something and got overtaken by people looking to disarm him. If he were running away he would have been busting tail 100%. Instead he was basically jogging. No sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Not "clearly running away".

Looked to me like he was running toward something and got overtaken by people looking to disarm him. If he were running away he would have been busting tail 100%. Instead he was basically jogging. No sale.

Maybe he's a slow white guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Not "clearly running away".

Looked to me like he was running toward something and got overtaken by people looking to disarm him. If he were running away he would have been busting tail 100%. Instead he was basically jogging. No sale.

LULZ this is the best you can come up with. Dude is being chased by a mob. What do you think happens when you try to "disarm" someone with a gun? 

article-9964-1.jpg

attack-on-kyle-rittenhouse-640x386.jpg

Edited by Triggerwarning
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...